Literature DB >> 24048257

Computational fluid dynamics investigation of chronic aortic dissection hemodynamics versus normal aorta.

Christof Karmonik1, Matthias Müller-Eschner, Sasan Partovi, Philipp Geisbüsch, Maria-Katharina Ganten, Jean Bismuth, Mark G Davies, Dittmar Böckler, Matthias Loebe, Alan B Lumsden, Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate hemodynamic changes during aneurysmal dilatation in chronic type B aortic dissections compared to hemodynamic parameters in the healthy aorta with the use of computational fluid dynamics (CFD).
METHODS: True lumen (TL)/false lumen (FL) dimensional changes, changes in total pressure (TP), and wall shear stress (WSS) were evaluated at follow-up (FU) compared to initial examination (IE) with transient CFD simulation with geometries derived from clinical image data and inflow boundary conditions from magnetic resonance images. The TL/FL pressure gradient between ascending and descending aorta (DAo) and maximum WSS at the site of largest dilatation was compared to values for the healthy aorta.
RESULTS: Hemodynamic changes at site of largest FL dilatation included 77% WSS reduction and 69% TP reduction. Compared to the healthy aorta, pressure gradient between ascending and DAo was a factor of 1.4 higher in the TL and a factor of 1.5 in the FL and increased at FU (1.6 and 1.7, respectively). Maximum WSS at the site of largest dilatation was a factor of 3 lower than that for the healthy aorta at IE and decreased by more than a factor of 2 at FU.
CONCLUSIONS: The FL dilatation at FU favorably reduced TP. In contrast, unfavorable increase in pressure gradient between ascending and DAo was observed with higher values than in the healthy aorta. Maximum WSS was reduced at the site of largest dilation compared to healthy aorta.

Entities:  

Keywords:  aortic dissection; computational fluid dynamics; hemodynamics; magnetic resonance imaging

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24048257     DOI: 10.1177/1538574413503561

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Vasc Endovascular Surg        ISSN: 1538-5744            Impact factor:   1.089


  9 in total

1.  Subject-Specific Studies of CSF Bulk Flow Patterns in the Spinal Canal: Implications for the Dispersion of Solute Particles in Intrathecal Drug Delivery.

Authors:  W Coenen; C Gutiérrez-Montes; S Sincomb; E Criado-Hidalgo; K Wei; K King; V Haughton; C Martínez-Bazán; A L Sánchez; J C Lasheras
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2019-06-13       Impact factor: 3.825

2.  Index of microcirculatory resistance: state-of-the-art and potential applications in computational simulation of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Yingyi Geng; Xintong Wu; Haipeng Liu; Dingchang Zheng; Ling Xia
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.066

3.  Simulating progressive intramural damage leading to aortic dissection using DeepONet: an operator-regression neural network.

Authors:  Minglang Yin; Ehsan Ban; Bruno V Rego; Enrui Zhang; Cristina Cavinato; Jay D Humphrey; George Em Karniadakis
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2022-02-09       Impact factor: 4.118

4.  Image quality and radiation dose of ECG-triggered High-Pitch Dual-Source cardiac computed tomography angiography in children for the evaluation of central vascular stents.

Authors:  Christian A Barrera; Hansel J Otero; Ammie M White; David Saul; David M Biko
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2019-01-25       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 5.  Computational fluid dynamics modelling in cardiovascular medicine.

Authors:  Paul D Morris; Andrew Narracott; Hendrik von Tengg-Kobligk; Daniel Alejandro Silva Soto; Sarah Hsiao; Angela Lungu; Paul Evans; Neil W Bressloff; Patricia V Lawford; D Rodney Hose; Julian P Gunn
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 5.994

6.  Effects of circulating levels of Th17 cells on the outcomes of acute Stanford B aortic dissection patients after thoracic endovascular aortic repair: A 36-month follow-up study a cohort study.

Authors:  Hongtao Liu; Ting Xiao; Le Zhang; Ying Huang; Ying Shi; Qingwei Ji; Lei Shi; Tao Zeng; Yingzhong Lin; Ling Liu
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2019-12       Impact factor: 1.817

Review 7.  MRI in Chronic Aortic Dissection: A Systematic Review and Future Directions.

Authors:  Andrew G Sherrah; Stuart M Grieve; Richmond W Jeremy; Paul G Bannon; Michael P Vallely; Rajesh Puranik
Journal:  Front Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2015-02-19

8.  Multi-modality image-based computational analysis of haemodynamics in aortic dissection.

Authors:  Desmond Dillon-Murphy; Alia Noorani; David Nordsletten; C Alberto Figueroa
Journal:  Biomech Model Mechanobiol       Date:  2015-09-28

9.  Data-driven Modeling of Hemodynamics and its Role on Thrombus Size and Shape in Aortic Dissections.

Authors:  Alireza Yazdani; He Li; Matthew R Bersi; Paolo Di Achille; Joseph Insley; Jay D Humphrey; George Em Karniadakis
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-02-06       Impact factor: 4.379

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.