| Literature DB >> 24048228 |
E Allaria1, F Bencivenga, R Borghes, F Capotondi, D Castronovo, P Charalambous, P Cinquegrana, M B Danailov, G De Ninno, A Demidovich, S Di Mitri, B Diviacco, D Fausti, W M Fawley, E Ferrari, L Froehlich, D Gauthier, A Gessini, L Giannessi, R Ivanov, M Kiskinova, G Kurdi, B Mahieu, N Mahne, I Nikolov, C Masciovecchio, E Pedersoli, G Penco, L Raimondi, C Serpico, P Sigalotti, S Spampinati, C Spezzani, C Svetina, M Trovò, M Zangrando.
Abstract
Exploring the dynamics of matter driven to extreme non-equilibrium states by an intense ultrashort X-ray pulse is becoming reality, thanks to the advent of free-electron laser technology that allows development of different schemes for probing the response at variable time delay with a second pulse. Here we report the generation of two-colour extreme ultraviolet pulses of controlled wavelengths, intensity and timing by seeding of high-gain harmonic generation free-electron laser with multiple independent laser pulses. The potential of this new scheme is demonstrated by the time evolution of a titanium-grating diffraction pattern, tuning the two coherent pulses to the titanium M-resonance and varying their intensities. This reveals that an intense pulse induces abrupt pattern changes on a time scale shorter than hydrodynamic expansion and ablation. This result exemplifies the essential capabilities of the jitter-free multiple-colour free-electron laser pulse sequences to study evolving states of matter with element sensitivity.Entities:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24048228 PMCID: PMC3791458 DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3476
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Nat Commun ISSN: 2041-1723 Impact factor: 14.919
Figure 1Generation and characterization of the twin-seeded FEL pulses and experimental set-up.
(a) Energetically distinct two ultraviolet laser pulses with an adjustable delay interact with a single electron bunch. Inside the FEL amplifier, the two seeded regions emit XUV radiation. The wavelength and temporal separation of generated twin FEL pulses are determined by the parameters of the seed laser pulses and the spectral purity, pulse intensities and widths of the pulses is monitored by an ‘online’ spectrometer. (b) Typical spectrum of the twin-FEL pulses. (c) Sequence of FEL spectra obtained during a temporal scan of the seed laser pulse pair with respect to the electron bunch. The zero time is defined as the instant when the first laser pulse interacts with the electron bunch. Increasing the arrival time delay of the laser pulses with respect to the electron bunch, the emission of the second FEL pulse is evident after ~500 fs. The relative time separation, marked by the dashed red line, between the two FEL spectral lines ensures that the temporal structure of the twin FEL emission is determined by the delay between the seed laser pair. (d) Experimental layout: the twin FEL pulses with different wavelength, focused by K–B optics (shown in (a)), impinge on the Ti grating (80-nm thick and 165-nm wide Ti strips with 400-nm pitch fabricated on a 20-nm thick Si3N4 window) and are diffracted along the horizontal plane. The seventh order diffraction pattern is detected by a CCD camera placed off-axis with respect to the direct beam.
Figure 2Spectral and intensity stability of twin-seeded FEL radiation.
Sequence of 1,150 consecutive single-shot FEL emission spectra (a) and corresponding intensities (b). Green dash lines highlight the intentional blocking of one of the seed laser arms (pump or probe) in order to suppress one of the FEL pulses. The filled markers identify the FEL emission configuration: double FEL emission using twin laser seed pulses (red circles, total signal), single FEL emission probe signal only (blue triangles) and single FEL emission pump signal only (green squares). The open markers are the absolute intensities of a single pulse (green for pump and blue for probe) for two-colour emission, obtained from the corresponding peak area in the spectra. Probability distribution for the peak wavelength jitter (c) and emission intensity (d). The colours correspond to the configurations reported in panel (b).
Figure 3Diffraction as a function of the FEL intensity.
Diffraction patterns obtained using λ1=37.39±0.03 nm (pump) and λ2=37.22±0.03 nm (probe) pulses with a pump–probe delay of 500 fs. (a) Single-colour low-F pump (~32 mJ cm−2 per pulse). (b) Single-colour low-F probe (~9 mJ cm−2 per pulse). (c) Two-colour low-F pump and probe (pump~31 mJ cm−2 per pulse, probe~11 mJ cm−2 per pulse). (d) Two-colour high-F single-shot pump and probe (pump~2.5 J cm−2, probe~1.0 J cm−2). The low-F patterns in a–c are obtained integrating over 150 shots. Yellow dash lines indicate the positions of diffraction peaks for the pump and probe pulses of the low-F unperturbed state. The panels e,f show the diffraction line-shape along the dispersive direction of the Ti grating. In g the diffraction line profile of the pump–probe pattern (black line) is compared with the sum (dashed green line) of the pump (dashed blue line) and probe (dashed red line) profiles, weighted to the corresponding pulse intensity. The featured line-shape and the differences in the profiles of the pump and probe pulses are due to structural imperfections of the grating. The corresponding spectra of the incident beam are shown in the panels i–l.
Figure 4Simulated diffraction line-shape.
Calculated diffraction line-shape for the Ti grating illuminated by the two twin FEL pulses at 37.2 and 37.4 nm. Black lines are obtained by assuming no wavelength shift of the optical constant (that is, low-F regime). Red lines panels (a,b) show the modification of the diffraction line-shape induced by 0.5- and 2.3-nm shift towards shorter wavelength of both δ and β for the probe pulse. Blue and green dash-dot lines correspond to the diffracted signal from the pump and the probe, respectively. In the simulation, the same experimental ratio of 3:1 between the intensity of the pump and the probe was assumed.