Literature DB >> 24048116

Educational quality of YouTube videos on knee arthrocentesis.

Jonas Fischer1, Jeroen Geurts, Victor Valderrabano, Thomas Hügle.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Knee arthrocentesis is a commonly performed diagnostic and therapeutic procedure in rheumatology and orthopedic surgery. Classic teaching of arthrocentesis skills relies on hands-on practice under supervision. Video-based online teaching is an increasingly utilized educational tool in higher and clinical education. YouTube is a popular video-sharing Web site that can be accessed as a teaching source.
OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the educational value of YouTube videos on knee arthrocentesis posted by health professionals and institutions during the period from 2008 to 2012.
METHODS: The YouTube video database was systematically searched using 5 search terms related to knee arthrocentesis. Two independent clinical reviewers assessed videos for procedural technique and educational value using a 5-point global score, ranging from 1 = poor quality to 5 = excellent educational quality. As validated international guidelines are lacking, we used the guidelines of the Swiss Society of Rheumatology as criterion standard for the procedure.
RESULTS: Of more than thousand findings, 13 videos met the inclusion criteria. Of those, 2 contained additional animated video material: one was purely animated, and one was a check list. The average length was 3.31 ± 2.28 minutes. The most popular video had 1388 hits per month. Our mean global score for educational value was 3.1 ± 1.0. Eight videos (62 %) were considered useful for teaching purposes. Use of a "no-touch" procedure, meaning that once disinfected the skin remains untouched before needle penetration, was present in all videos. Six videos (46%) demonstrated full sterile conditions. There was no clear preference of a medial (n = 8) versus lateral (n = 5) approach.
CONCLUSIONS: A discreet number of YouTube videos on knee arthrocentesis appeared to be suitable for application in a Web-based format for medical students, fellows, and residents. The low-average mean global score for overall educational value suggests an improvement of future video-based instructional materials on YouTube would be necessary before regular use for teaching could be recommended.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24048116     DOI: 10.1097/RHU.0b013e3182a69fb2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Rheumatol        ISSN: 1076-1608            Impact factor:   3.517


  28 in total

1.  Training value of laparoscopic colorectal videos on the World Wide Web: a pilot study on the educational quality of laparoscopic right hemicolectomy videos.

Authors:  V Celentano; M Browning; C Hitchins; M C Giglio; M G Coleman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-04-04       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Viewer discretion advised: is YouTube a friend or foe in surgical education?

Authors:  H Alejandro Rodriguez; Monica T Young; Hope T Jackson; Brant K Oelschlager; Andrew S Wright
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  The Quality of Open-Access Video-Based Orthopaedic Instructional Content for the Shoulder Physical Exam is Inconsistent.

Authors:  Ekaterina Urch; Samuel A Taylor; Elizabeth Cody; Peter D Fabricant; Jayme C Burket; Stephen J O'Brien; David M Dines; Joshua S Dines
Journal:  HSS J       Date:  2016-06-29

Review 4.  The Use of Social Media in Graduate Medical Education: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Madeline Sterling; Peggy Leung; Drew Wright; Tara F Bishop
Journal:  Acad Med       Date:  2017-07       Impact factor: 6.893

5.  Evaluation of the Reliability, Utility, and Quality of the Information in Sleeve Gastrectomy Videos Shared on Open Access Video Sharing Platform YouTube.

Authors:  Murat Ferhat Ferhatoglu; Abdulcabbar Kartal; Ugur Ekici; Alp Gurkan
Journal:  Obes Surg       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 4.129

6.  Educational Quality of YouTube Videos in Thumb Exercises for Carpometacarpal Osteoarthritis: A Search on Current Practice.

Authors:  Jorge Hugo Villafañe; Raquel Cantero-Tellez; Kristin Valdes; Federico Giuseppe Usuelli; Pedro Berjano
Journal:  Hand (N Y)       Date:  2017-09-14

7.  YouTube provides irrelevant information for the diagnosis and treatment of hip arthritis.

Authors:  Ulrich Koller; Wenzel Waldstein; Klaus-Dieter Schatz; Reinhard Windhager
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2016-03-31       Impact factor: 3.075

8.  YouTube as a potential training method for laparoscopic cholecystectomy.

Authors:  Jun Suh Lee; Ho Seok Seo; Tae Ho Hong
Journal:  Ann Surg Treat Res       Date:  2015-07-09       Impact factor: 1.859

9.  YouTube is the Most Frequently Used Educational Video Source for Surgical Preparation.

Authors:  Allison K Rapp; Michael G Healy; Mary E Charlton; Jerrod N Keith; Marcy E Rosenbaum; Muneera R Kapadia
Journal:  J Surg Educ       Date:  2016-06-14       Impact factor: 2.891

10.  Thyroid surgery YouTube videos: estimating quality by surgeon characteristics and view rate.

Authors:  Courtney Brooke Shires; Caleb D Wilson; Merry Sebelik
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2019-06
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.