Literature DB >> 24047281

Evaluation of the agreement between modeled and monitored ambient hazardous air pollutants in California.

Erika Garcia1, Susan Hurley, David O Nelson, Robert B Gunier, Andrew Hertz, Peggy Reynolds.   

Abstract

Elevated breast cancer incidence rates in urban areas have led to speculation regarding the potential role of air pollution. In order to inform the exposure assessment for a subsequent breast cancer study, we evaluated agreement between modeled and monitored hazardous air pollutants (HAPs). Modeled annual ambient concentrations of HAPs in California came from the US Environmental Protection Agency's National Air Toxics Assessment database for 1996, 1999, 2002, and 2005 and corresponding monitored data from the California Air Resources Board's air quality monitoring program. We selected 12 compounds of interest for our study and focused on evaluating agreement between modeled and monitored data, and of temporal trends. Modeled data generally underestimated the monitored data, especially in 1996. For most compounds agreement between modeled and monitored concentrations improved over time. We concluded that 2002 and 2005 modeled data agree best with monitored data and are the most appropriate years for direct use in our subsequent epidemiologic analysis.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NATA; agreement; air toxics; exposure; hazardous air pollutants

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24047281     DOI: 10.1080/09603123.2013.835031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Environ Health Res        ISSN: 0960-3123            Impact factor:   3.411


  9 in total

1.  Metallic Air Pollutants and Breast Cancer Risk in a Nationwide Cohort Study.

Authors:  Alexandra J White; Katie M O'Brien; Nicole M Niehoff; Rachel Carroll; Dale P Sandler
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2019-01       Impact factor: 4.822

2.  Differences in environmental exposure assignment due to residential mobility among children with a central nervous system tumor: Texas, 1995-2009.

Authors:  Heather E Danysh; Laura E Mitchell; Kai Zhang; Michael E Scheurer; Philip J Lupo
Journal:  J Expo Sci Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 5.563

3.  Air pollution and Breast Cancer: A Review.

Authors:  Alexandra J White; Patrick T Bradshaw; Ghassan B Hamra
Journal:  Curr Epidemiol Rep       Date:  2018-03-27

4.  Bayesian G-Computation for Estimating Impacts of Interventions on Exposure Mixtures: Demonstration With Metals From Coal-Fired Power Plants and Birth Weight.

Authors:  Alexander P Keil; Jessie P Buckley; Amy E Kalkbrenner
Journal:  Am J Epidemiol       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 4.897

5.  Machine learning-driven identification of early-life air toxic combinations associated with childhood asthma outcomes.

Authors:  Yan-Chak Li; Hsiao-Hsien Leon Hsu; Yoojin Chun; Po-Hsiang Chiu; Zoe Arditi; Luz Claudio; Gaurav Pandey; Supinda Bunyavanich
Journal:  J Clin Invest       Date:  2021-11-15       Impact factor: 19.456

6.  A Model-to-Monitor Evaluation of 2011 National-Scale Air Toxics Assessment (NATA).

Authors:  Zhuqing Xue; Chunrong Jia
Journal:  Toxics       Date:  2019-03-10

7.  Residential exposure to estrogen disrupting hazardous air pollutants and breast cancer risk: the California Teachers Study.

Authors:  Ruiling Liu; David O Nelson; Susan Hurley; Andrew Hertz; Peggy Reynolds
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 4.860

8.  Hazardous air pollutants and breast cancer risk in California teachers: a cohort study.

Authors:  Erika Garcia; Susan Hurley; David O Nelson; Andrew Hertz; Peggy Reynolds
Journal:  Environ Health       Date:  2015-01-30       Impact factor: 7.123

9.  Hazardous air pollutants and telomere length in the Sister Study.

Authors:  Nicole M Niehoff; Marilie D Gammon; Alexander P Keil; Hazel B Nichols; Lawrence S Engel; Jack A Taylor; Alexandra J White; Dale P Sandler
Journal:  Environ Epidemiol       Date:  2019-06-28
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.