Li Zhang1, Meng Huang, Ian A Blair, Trevor M Penning. 1. Center of Excellence in Environmental Toxicology and ‡Center for Cancer Pharmacology, Department of Pharmacology, Perelman School of Medicine, University of Pennsylvania , Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19104-6160, United States.
Abstract
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are environmental and tobacco carcinogens. Proximate carcinogenic PAH trans-dihydrodiols are activated by human aldo-keto reductases (AKRs) to yield electrophilic and redox-active o-quinones. Interconversion among benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P)-7,8-dione, a representative PAH o-quinone, and its corresponding catechol generates a futile redox-cycle with the concomitant production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). We investigated whether glucuronidation of B[a]P-7,8-catechol by human UDP glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) could intercept the catechol in three different human lung cells. RT-PCR showed that UGT1A1, 1A3, and 2B7 were only expressed in human lung adenocarcinoma A549 cells. The corresponding recombinant UGTs were examined for their kinetic constants and product profile using B[a]P-7,8-catechol as a substrate. B[a]P-7,8-dione was reduced to B[a]P-7,8-catechol by dithiothreitol under anaerobic conditions and then further glucuronidated by the UGTs in the presence of uridine-5'-diphosphoglucuronic acid as a glucuronic acid group donor. UGT1A1 catalyzed the glucuronidation of B[a]P-7,8-catechol and generated two isomeric O-monoglucuronsyl-B[a]P-7,8-catechol products that were identified by RP-HPLC and by LC-MS/MS. By contrast, UGT1A3 and 2B7 catalyzed the formation of only one monoglucuronide, which was identical to that formed in A549 cells. The kinetic profiles of three UGTs followed Michaelis-Menten kinetics. On the basis of the expression levels of UGT1A3 and UGT2B7 and the observation that a single monoglucuronide was produced in A549 cells, we suggest that the major UGT isoforms in A549 cells that can intercept B[a]P-7,8-catechol are UGT1A3 and 2B7.
Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are environmental and tobacco carcinogens. Proximate carcinogenicPAH trans-dihydrodiols are activated by human aldo-keto reductases (AKRs) to yield electrophilic and redox-active o-quinones. Interconversion among benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P)-7,8-dione, a representative PAH o-quinone, and its corresponding catechol generates a futile redox-cycle with the concomitant production of reactive oxygen species (ROS). We investigated whether glucuronidation of B[a]P-7,8-catecholby human UDP glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs) could intercept the catechol in three different human lung cells. RT-PCR showed that UGT1A1, 1A3, and 2B7 were only expressed in humanlung adenocarcinoma A549 cells. The corresponding recombinant UGTs were examined for their kinetic constants and product profile using B[a]P-7,8-catechol as a substrate. B[a]P-7,8-dione was reduced to B[a]P-7,8-catecholby dithiothreitol under anaerobic conditions and then further glucuronidated by the UGTs in the presence of uridine-5'-diphosphoglucuronic acid as a glucuronic acid group donor. UGT1A1 catalyzed the glucuronidation of B[a]P-7,8-catechol and generated two isomeric O-monoglucuronsyl-B[a]P-7,8-catechol products that were identified by RP-HPLC and by LC-MS/MS. By contrast, UGT1A3 and 2B7 catalyzed the formation of only one monoglucuronide, which was identical to that formed in A549 cells. The kinetic profiles of three UGTs followed Michaelis-Menten kinetics. On the basis of the expression levels of UGT1A3 and UGT2B7 and the observation that a single monoglucuronide was produced in A549 cells, we suggest that the major UGT isoforms in A549 cells that can intercept B[a]P-7,8-catechol are UGT1A3 and 2B7.
Polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbons (PAHs) are characterized by the
presence of two or more fused benzene rings arranged in various configurations.[1] PAHs are ubiquitous airborne environmental pollutants
that arise from the incomplete combustion of fossil fuels and are
also present in automobile exhaust and first- and secondhand cigarette
smoke. PAHs are one of the major classes of carcinogens found in tobacco
smoke and are suspect lung carcinogens. Benzo[a]pyrene
(B[a]P), the most studied PAH, has been recently
upgraded to a Group 1 “known human carcinogen” by the
International Agency for Research on Cancer.[2,3]PAHs are not biological reactive, and the biotransformation of
PAHs to electrophilic metabolites is required to elicit their tumorigenic
effects.[4] There are three major routes
for PAH activation which include the formation of radical cations,[5] diol epoxides,[4,6] and electrophilic
and redox-active o-quinones.[7] In the o-quinone pathway, AKRs catalyze the oxidation
of proximate PAH carcinogens, trans-dihydrodiols,
to yield ketols which spontaneously rearrange to catechols. PAH catechols
are not stable and undergo autooxidation to form PAH o-quinones with the concomitant production of reactive oxygen species
(ROS) (Figure 1).[8−11] PAH o-quinones
are electrophilic and highly reactive with endogenous nucleophiles
and yield l-cysteine, N-acetyl-l-cysteine, and GSH conjugates.[12] Electrophilic
PAH o-quinones can also form both depurinating DNA
adducts in vitro(13) and
stable covalent DNA adducts in vitro and in human
lung cells.[14−16] Apart from their electrophilicity, PAH o-quinones are also redox active and undergo nonenzymatic or enzymatic
reduction to reform catechols at the expense of consuming NADPH. Enzymes
that contribute to this redox cycling include NAD(P)(H):quinone oxidoreductase
(NQO1), carbonyl reductases (CBR1 and CBR3), and AKRs themselves.
Among these three enzymes, the AKRs are the most efficient.[17] ROS produced by redox cycling of the PAH o-quinones mediates DNA damage and can lead to 7,8-dihydro-8-oxo-2′deoxyguanosine
(8-oxo-dGuo) lesions[18,19] which contribute to G-to-T transversions
in p53.[20,21] It was found that even
nanomolar concentrations of PAH o-quinones were able
to generate sufficient ROS to cause a significant increase in 8-oxo-dGuo.[18,19]
Figure 1
Metabolic
activation of B[a]P by AKRs and detoxication
of B[a]P-7,8-dione by UGTs.
Metabolic
activation of B[a]Pby AKRs and detoxication
of B[a]P-7,8-dioneby UGTs.Using B[a]P as a representative PAH and
stable
isotope dilution liquid chromatography–tandem mass spectrometry,
we found that all three pathways of PAH activation were functional
in humanbronchoalveolar H358 cells.[22] Also,
using A549 cells which show high constitutive expression of AKRs,
we found that B[a]P-7,8-trans-dihydrodiol
(an AKR substrate) was converted to B[a]P-7,8-dione
and that the ROS produced increased the level of 8-oxo-dGuo in cellular
DNA as measured by stable isotope dilution liquid chromatography–tandem
mass spectrometry.[23] Importantly, the level
of 8-oxo-dGuo produced from B[a]P-7,8-trans-dihydrodiol was elevated further in the presence of a COMT inhibitor
suggesting that a redox cycle was occurring.[23]These observations led to a systematic study of the role of
phase
II conjugating enzymes in intercepting PAH-catechols to prevent redox
cycling. Humancatechol-O-methyl transferase (COMT)
and sulfotransferases (SULT) 1A1, 1A3, and 1E1 were able to detoxify
B[a]P-7,8-dioneby intercepting B[a]P-7,8-catechol through the formation of O-methylated-B[a]P-7,8-catechol and O-sulfated-B[a]P-7,8-catechol, respectively.[24,25] Another superfamily of phase II metabolic enzymes, uridine diphosphate
glucuronosyltransferases (UGTs), are microsomal enzymes which catalyze
the transfer of the glucuronosyl group from uridine 5′-diphospho-glucuronic
acid (UDPGA) to substrates that contain alcohols, amines, or carboxylic
acids as functional groups.[26] UGTs are
divided into two main subfamilies UGT1 and UGT2based on amino acid
sequence identity[27] and are responsible
for the glucuronidation of a variety of endogenous compounds and xenobiotics.[28] UGTs are widely distributed in a variety of
tissues, including the liver, intestine, brain, and kidney, and the
aerodigestive tract, etc.[29] UGT1A7, UGT1A8,
UGT1A9, and UGT1A10 and UGT2B7 are active against several PAH metabolites,[30−35] while UGT1A10 > UGT1A9 > UGT1A1 > UGT1A7 are the preferred
isoforms
for catalyzing the glucurondiation of B[a]P-7,8-trans-dihydrodiol.[36] However,
the glucuronidation of PAH catecholsby UGTs has not been previously
examined.Studies of B[a]P-7,8-dione metabolism
and disposition
in three human lung cells HBEC-KT, H358, and A549 cells showed rapid
disappearance of the quinone accompanied by the formation of phase
II conjugates and a N1 or N3-adenine adduct originating from the nucleotide
pool.[37] In A549 cells, one of the phase
II conjugates was O-monoglucuronsyl-B[a]P-7,8-catechol indicating that UGTs play a role in the interception/detoxication
of PAH catechols. In the present study, we investigated whether glucuronidation
catalyzed by humanUGTs is a feasible detoxication pathway for B[a]P-7,8-dione and identified two major enzyme isoforms responsible
for the glucuronidation of B[a]P-7,8-catechol.
Materials and Methods
Chemical and Reagents
7-Hydroxy-4-(trifluoromethyl)coumarin(HFC),
alamethicin, and uridine-5′-diphosphoglucuronic acid (UDPGA)
were purchased from Sigma-Aldrich Co. (St. Louis, MO). [14C]-Uridine-5′diphosphoglucuronic acid (180 mCi/mmol) was purchased
from Perkin Elmer Inc. (Waltham, MA). Benzo[a]pyrene-7,8-dione
(B[a]P-7,8-dione) was synthesized according to published
procedures.[38] All solvents were of HPLC
grade, and all other chemicals used were of the highest grade available.
UGT1A1, 1A3, and 2B7 Supersomes (microsomes from baculovirus infected
insect cells expressing UGTs) were obtained from BD Biosciences (San
Jose, CA) and titered before use, using standard substrates.
Cell Lines
and Culture Condition
A549 cells (humanlung adenocarcinoma cells) were from American Type Culture Collection
(ATCC number CCL-185) and cultured in F-12K medium (Kaighn’s
modification) with supplementation of 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 2
mM l-glutamine, 100 units/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL
streptomycin. HepG2 cells (hepatoma cells) from ATCC were cultured
in Eagle’s minimal essential medium supplemented with 10% heat-inactivated
fetal bovine serum, 1% l-glutamine, and 100 units/mL penicillin/streptomycin
solution. H358 cells (humanbronchoalveolar cells) were purchased
from American Type Culture Collection (ATCC number CRL-5807) and cultured
in RPMI 1640 medium containing 10% heat-inactivated FBS, 2 mM l-glutamine, 100 units/mL penicillin, and 100 μg/mL streptomycin.
HBEC-KT cells (immortalized humanbronchial epithelial cells) originating
from a patient without lung cancer were kindly provided as a gift
by Dr. John Minna at University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
and cultured in keratinocyte-serum-free medium with 0.1–0.2
ng/mL recombinant EGF, 20–30 μg/mL bovine pituitary extract,
and 2 mM l-glutamine. BEAS-2B cells (normal humanbronchial
epithelium cells) were obtained from American Type Culture Collection
(ATCC number CRL-9609) and cultured in BEGM bronchial epithelium medium
(Cambrex CC-3170). Cells were maintained at 37 °C in a humidified
atmosphere containing 5% CO2 and 95% O2. Cultured
cells used in the experiments were confined to passage numbers of
10–20.
RT-PCR Analysis of UGT mRNA Expression in
Human Cells
Extraction of total RNA from each cell line was
conducted using the
RNeasy Kit (Qiagen, Valencia, CA). Reverse transcription (RT) was
conducted by using GeneAmp RNA PCR Core Kit according to the manufacturer’s
protocol (Applied Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA). An aliquot of 1 μL
of cDNA synthesized in the above RT reaction was used for PCR. The
PCR system (25 μL) contained 1× PCR buffer (10 mM Tris-HClbuffer, pH 8.3, and 50 mM KCl), 2.5 mM MgCl2, 250 μM
dNTPs, 0.2 μM primers, and 0.5 U of Taq DNA polymerase (Applied
Biosystems, Carlsbad, CA). The sequences of the forward and reverse
primer pairs for the amplification of UGT1A1, 1A3, 1A7, 1A8, 1A9,
1A10, and 2B7 and β-actin transcripts are shown in Table 1.[39−41] PCR amplification was performed with a MyCycler Thermal
Cycler PCR system (Bio-Rad, CA) using the following protocol. After
an initial denaturation step at 94 °C for 3 min, amplification
was conducted by denaturation at 95 °C for 30 s, annealing at
61 °C (for UGT1A1), 63 °C (for UGT1A8), or 57 °C (for
other UGT isoforms) for 30 s, and extension at 72 °C for 45 s
for 35 cycles. The final extension reaction was performed at 72 °C
for 7 min. H2O was used as the negative control. The control
samples were amplified using the same conditions as those described
above. An aliquot of 20 μL of PCR products was analyzed by electrophoresis
in 2% agarose gel with ethidium bromide and visualized under UV light.
Table 1
RT-PCR Primers for UGT Genes Tested
in Various Human Cell Lines
genes
forward primers
reverse primersa,b
GenBank accession no.
location of forward primer (nt)
length of products (bp)
UGT1A1
5′-AACAAGGAGCTCATGGCCTCC-3′
5′-GTTCGCAAGATTCGATGGTCG-3′
NM_00463
412–432
646
UGT1A3
5′-TGTTGAACAATATGTCTTTGGTCTA-3′
5′-GTTCGCAAGATTCGATGGTCG-3′
NM_019093
347–371
698
UGT1A7
5-ATGCTCGCTGGACGGCACCATTG-3′
5′-GTTCGCAAGATTCGATGGTCG-3′
U89507
284–306
749
UGT1A8
5′-GGTCTTCGCCAGGGGAATAGG-3′
5′-GTTCGCAAGATTCGATGGTCG-3′
AF030310
489–518
535
UGT1A9
5′-GGAGGAACATTTATTATGCCACCG-3′
5′-GTTCGCAAGATTCGATGGTCG-3′
AF056188
660–683
391
UGT1A10
5′-CCTCTTTCCTATGTCCCCAATGA-3′
5′-GTTCGCAAGATTCGATGGTCG-3′
U89508
556–578
477
UGT2B7
5′-TTCACAAGTACAGGAAATCATGTCA-3′
5′-ACCACAACACCATTTTCTCC-3′
NM-001074
341–365
592
β-actin
5′-CACCCACACTGTGCCCATC-3′
5′-CTAGAAGCATTTGCGGTGG-3′
652
The reverse primer for the amplification
of UGT2B7 is located between 931-912 nts. Primers were taken from
ref (29).
The same exon-3 derived antisense
primer was used for all RT-PCR amplification of family 1 UGTs.
The reverse primer for the amplification
of UGT2B7 is located between 931-912 nts. Primers were taken from
ref (29).The same exon-3 derived antisense
primer was used for all RT-PCR amplification of family 1 UGTs.
Standard Assay for UGT Activity
UGT enzyme assays were
conducted as recommended by BD Biosciences (San Jose, CA). Briefly,
the reaction system was composed of 50 mM Trisbuffer of pH 7.4, 10
mM MgCl2, 1 mM UDPGA, 0.025 mg/mL alamethicin, 50 μM
7-hydroxy-4-(trifluoromethyl)coumarin, and 10 μg of UGT supersome
in a final volume of 100 μL. Reactions were initiated by the
addition of UDPGA. After incubation at 37 °C for 15 min, the
reactions were terminated by the addition of 50 μL of 94% acetonitrile/6%
glacial acetic acid and were centrifugated at 16,000g for 10 min. An aliquot of 100 μL of supernatant was carefully
pipetted, and 50 μL was injected into HPLC/PDA for the quantification
of 7-hydroxy-4-(trifluoromethyl)coumarin glucuronide. The reversed-phase
column (Agilent Zorbax-ODS C18, 5 μm, 4.6 × 250 mm, CA)
was used for the separation of substrate from product. Elution conditions
used a flow rate of 1 mL/min with 80%:20% water/methanol (v/v) containing
0.1% formic acid. The methanol concentration was increased from 20%
to 80% over 3 min and kept at 80% methanol for 4 min, then changed
back to 20% methanol in 1 min followed by a re-equilibration phase
of 7 min at 20% methanol.
Kinetic Studies on Glucuronidation of B[a]P-7,8-Catechol
The reactions were performed anaerobically
in a glovebox purged
with argon. All of the solvent and aqueous solutions were degassed
by freeze–pump–thaw cycling five times and stored in
sealed containers filled with argon. The experiments were conducted
in 1.5 mL amber glass vials with polytetrafluoroethylene/silicone
septa closures. The reaction system was composed of 10 mM KPO4 buffer at pH 7.4, 1.0 mM dithiothreitol, 5.0 mM MgCl2, 0.025 mg/ml alamethicin, 1 mM [14C]-UDPGA (4
dpm/pmol), 0–20 μM B[a]P-7,8-dione,
and 15–30 μg of microsomes containing human recombinant
UGTs in a final volume of 0.2 mL. The reactions were initiated by
the addition of UDPGA and incubated for 30 min (for UGT 1A1) or 60
min (for UGT 1A3 and 2B7) at 25 °C. The incubation time and amount
of enzyme used were always in the linear range as determined by plots
of initial velocity versus incubation time or enzyme concentration.
The reactions were terminated by the addition of 50 μL of ice-cold
1% formic acid and were chilled on ice. The reaction mixtures were
extracted with 0.5 mL aliquots of ethyl acetate twice by vortex mixing
and centrifuged at 16,000g to help phase separation.
The combined ethyl acetate layer was backwashed with 0.2 mL of 1%
formic acidby vigorous vortexing and centrifuged at 16,000g. The ethyl acetate was then dried by a SpeedVac concentrator
(Thermo Scientific). The residue was dissolved in 100 μL of
methanol and analyzed by scintillation counting or by HPLC analysis.
Kinetic analyses using nonlinear regression were performed by fitting
the Michaelis–Menten equation to the data with the program
Grafit,where v is the initial velocity
of the reaction, [S] is the molar concentration of the substrate,
and Km is the Michaelis–Menten
constant for the substrate. Because of the iterative fits of the equations
to each data set, each fit provided estimates of the kinetic parameters
as a mean ± SE. Because it is not possible to normalize Vmax values to UGT protein expression, Vmax values are apparent values only based on
total protein.
Metabolism of B[a]P-7,8-Dione
in Human Lung
Cells
B[a]P-7,8-Dione was prepared in HBSSbuffer containing 1 mM sodium pyruvate at final concentration of 2
μM with 0.2% DMSO and then was used to treat A549, HBEC-KT,
and H358 cells (5 × 106) at confluency. The media
were collected at 0 and 24 h and acidified subsequently with 0.1%
formic acidbefore extraction with 2 × 1.5-fold volume of cold
H2O-saturated ethyl acetate. The organic phases of ethyl
acetate were combined and dried by a SpeedVac concentrator (Thermo
Scientific). The residue was dissolved in 100 μL of methanol.
A 20 μL aliquot was analyzed by LC-MS/MS.
Identification
of B[a]P-7,8-Catechol Glucuronides
by HPLC-RAM-UV and LC-MS/MS
The O-glucuronsyl-B[a]P-7,8-catechol conjugates formed in UGT reaction systems
were analyzed by a Waters Alliance 2695 chromatographic system (Waters
Corp., Milford, MA) in tandem with a Waters 996 photodiode array detector
and a β-RAM inline radiometric detector (IN/US Systems Inc.,
Tampa, FL) or with a Finnigan TSQ Quantum Ultra spectrometer (Thermo
Fisher, San Jose, CA). Chromatographic separation was conducted on
a reverse-phase column (Agilent Zorbax-ODS C18, 5 μm, 4.6 ×
250 mm, CA). The C18 reverse-phase column was eluted with the following
linear gradient of H2O (0.1% formic acid; solvent A)/MeOH
(solvent B) at a flow rate of 0.5 mL/min. Solvent B was changed from
50 to 95% (v/v) over 15 min, kept at 95% over 10 min, changed from
95 to 50% over 1 min, and kept at 50% for equilibration for 4 min.
The O-glucuronsyl-B[a]P-7,8-catechols
formed in reactions with [14C]-UDPGA were eluted from the
C18 reverse-phase column and introduced into the inline radiometric
detector using a mixture of the scintillant with the HPLC effluent
at a flow rate 1.5 mL/min. The O-glucuronsyl-B[a]P-7,8-catechols generated with unlabeled UDPGA were eluted
from the C18 reverse-phase column and analyzed by electrospray ionization
MS/MS. The mass spectrometer analysis was carried out in the positive
or negative ion mode with the following parameters: spray voltage
(4500 V at positive ion mode or −2000 V at negative ion mode),
vaporizer temperature (400 °C), sheath gas pressure (35 arbitrary
units), auxiliary gas pressure (10 arbitrary units), capillary temperature
(350 °C), and collision energy (20 V). The molecular masses of
the metabolites were acquired by detecting the molecular ion from
Q1 full scan, and the corresponding mass spectrum of each metabolite
was obtained from a Q3 full scan of the product ions of the molecular
ions.
Results
Gene Expression of UGTs in Human Lung Cells
We performed
RT-PCR to identify the UGT isoforms expressed in HepG2 cells and four
human lung cells. The UGTs selected were those that have been previously
characterized for the glucuronidation of B[a]P-7,8-trans-dihydrdodiol (UGT1A10 > UGT1A9 > UGT1A1 >
UGT1A7)[36] and the catechol estrogens (UGT1A8,
UGT1A9,
and UGT2B7).[42] Although RT-PCR is a semiquantitative
approach to analyze gene expression, we found that UGT1A1, 1A3, and
2B7 were expressed at the mRNA level in HepG2 and A549 cells among
the seven different UGT isoforms examined (Figure 2). The current studies focused on the glucuronidation of B[a]P-7,8-catecholby recombinant humanUGT1A1, 1A3, and 2B7,
which were major UGT isoforms in A549 cells.
Figure 2
Gene expression of UGTs
in various human cell lines. (HepG2, hepatoma
cells; A549, human lung adenocarcinoma cells; H358, human bronchoalveolar
cells; HBEC-KT, immortalized human bronchial epithelial cells; BEAS-2B,
normal human bronchial epithelial cells.)
Gene expression of UGTs
in various human cell lines. (HepG2, hepatoma
cells; A549, humanlung adenocarcinoma cells; H358, humanbronchoalveolar
cells; HBEC-KT, immortalized humanbronchial epithelial cells; BEAS-2B,
normal humanbronchial epithelial cells.)
Identification of B[a]P-7,8-Catechol Glucuronides
Produced by Human Recombinant UGT microsomes
Supersomes (BD-Biosciences)
containing overexpressed human recombinant UGTs were tittered in standard
assays. The standard assay for UGT activity using 7-hydroxy-4-(trifluoromethyl)coumarin
as a substrate demonstrated that the specific activities of UGT1A1,
1A3, and 2B7 were 1.18 (0.8), 0.96 (0.7), and 1.74 (1.51) nmol of
7-hydroxy-4-(trifluoromethyl)coumarin glucuronide formed/min/mg, respectively,
which are comparable to those values previously reported as indicated
by the values in parentheses.[43] UGT1A1,
1A3, and 2B7 were all able to catalyze the glucuronidation of B[a]P-7,8-catechol in the presence of UDPGA (Figure 3A,B,C), while no conjugates were generated in the
absence of UDPGA (Figure 3D). UGT1A3 and 2B7
catalyzed the formation of one O-glucurosonyl-B[a]P-7,8-catechol (M2), while UGT1A1 catalyzed the formation
of two O-glucuronsyl-B[a]P-7,8-catechols
(M1, M2). The UV spectra of the two glucuronides of B[a]P-7,8-catechol (M1, M2) were quite different (Figure 4). When they were compared with the UV spectrum of the O-glucuronsyl-B[a]P-7,8-catechol found
in A549 cell culture media, M2 was identified as the major glucuronide
formed in these cells.[37] The formation
of glucuronides of B[a]P-7,8-catechol was confirmed
by conducting the glucuronidation studies in the presence of [14C]-UDPGA. [14C]-O-glucuronsyl-B[a]P-7,8-catechol was detected with HPLC-RAM analysis (Figure 3 E).
Figure 3
HPLC/UV/RAM identification of B[a]P-7,8-catechol
glucuronide metabolites (M1 and M2). B[a]P-7,8-catechol
(20 μM) was generated in situ under anaerobic
conditions in an incubation buffer containing 1 mM dithiothreitol.
B[a]P-7,8-catechol was converted to the O-glucuronide(s) by UGT Supersomes supplemented with UDPGA (A, UGT1A1;
B, UGT1A3; and C, UGT2B7) in the presence of UDPGA. (D) Control incubations
were conducted in the absence of UDPGA. (E) HPLC-RAM chromatogram
of O-monoglucuronsyl-B[a]P-7,8-catechol
formed by UGT1A3 in the presence of [14C]-UDPGA. The delayed
retention time of the M2 metabolite is due to the fact that the radiometeric
detector is in-line and downstream from the absorbance (PDA) detector.
Figure 4
UV spectra of O-monoglucuronsyl-B[a]P-7,8-catechol metabolites (M1 and M2). B[a]P-7,8-catechol
(20 μM) was generated in situ under anaerobic
conditions in an incubation buffer containing 1 mM dithiothreitol.
B[a]P-7,8-catechol was converted to O-glucuronide(s) by UGT1A1 plus UDPGA. UV spectra of M1 and M2 were
collected by an in-line Waters 996 photodiode array detector.
HPLC/UV/RAM identification of B[a]P-7,8-catecholglucuronide metabolites (M1 and M2). B[a]P-7,8-catechol
(20 μM) was generated in situ under anaerobic
conditions in an incubation buffer containing 1 mM dithiothreitol.
B[a]P-7,8-catechol was converted to the O-glucuronide(s) by UGT Supersomes supplemented with UDPGA (A, UGT1A1;
B, UGT1A3; and C, UGT2B7) in the presence of UDPGA. (D) Control incubations
were conducted in the absence of UDPGA. (E) HPLC-RAM chromatogram
of O-monoglucuronsyl-B[a]P-7,8-catechol
formed by UGT1A3 in the presence of [14C]-UDPGA. The delayed
retention time of the M2 metabolite is due to the fact that the radiometeric
detector is in-line and downstream from the absorbance (PDA) detector.UV spectra of O-monoglucuronsyl-B[a]P-7,8-catechol metabolites (M1 and M2). B[a]P-7,8-catechol
(20 μM) was generated in situ under anaerobic
conditions in an incubation buffer containing 1 mM dithiothreitol.
B[a]P-7,8-catechol was converted to O-glucuronide(s) by UGT1A1 plus UDPGA. UV spectra of M1 and M2 were
collected by an in-line Waters 996 photodiode array detector.To determine whether B[a]-7,8-catechol formed
mono- or bis-glucuronide conjugates, LC-MS/MS was used to further
characterize the structure the M1 and M2 metabolites. The molecular
ions of both metabolites (M1, M2) were the same and showed a ([M +
H]+) m/z = 461 in the
positive ion mode and a ([M – H]–) m/z = 459 in the negative ion mode, respectively,
indicating that both M1 and M2 are O-monoglucuronsyl-B[a]P-7,8-catechols where the position of glucuronidation
is different. MS/MS analysis provided further evidence to the identity
of the metabolites. In the positive ion mode, the product ions of
the two metabolites were identical, and characteristic scission under
collision-induced dissociation occurred at the C–O glycosidic
bond with the loss of 176 amu resulting from the loss of the monodehydrated
glucuronic acid moiety to yield a fragment ion m/z = 285. Cleavage at one of the C–OH bonds resulted
in a daughter ion of m/z = 267 representing
the loss of H2O. Rearrangement resulting in a change of
the remaining phenolic group from a −C–OH to −C=O
bond is followed by the loss of −C=O group which resulted
in a fragment ion at m/z = 239.
In the negative ion mode, product ion spectra of two metabolites also
demonstrated characteristic cleavage at the C–O glycosidic
bond with a loss of 176 amu resulting in daughter ions at m/z = 283. LC-MS/MS analyses in both the
positive and negative ion modes confirmed that the metabolites (M1
and M2) formed in the reaction system were O-monoglucuronsyl-B[a]P-7,8-catechols. Since the mass spectra of M1 and M2 were
identical (Figure 5), it was not possible to
distinguish the position of glucuronic acid conjugation in the two
isomers. However, our studies on the sulfonation of B[a]P-7,8-catechol catalyzed by SULTs also led to the formation of two
regioisomeric O-monosulfated catechols, where the
earlier eluting species was shown by 2D-NMR to be the O7-monosulfate.[25] Thus, in this study the
later eluting M2 metabolite is tentatively assigned as the O8-monoglucuronsyl-B[a]P-7,8-catechol.
LC-MS/MS in the selected reaction monitoring mode (SRM) further confirmed
that UGT1A1 catalyzed the formation of isomeric O-monoglucuronsyl-B[a]P-7,8-catechols (M1, M2) and
UGT1A3 and that 2B7 catalyzed the formation of only one O-monoglucuronsyl-B[a]P-7,8-catechol (M2) (Figure 6).
Figure 5
LC/MS/MS identification of O-monoglucuronsyl-B[a]P-7,8-catechols (M1 and M2). B[a]P-7,8-catechol
(20 μM) was generated in situ under anaerobic
conditions in the presence of 1 mM dithiothreitol. B[a]P-7,8-catechol was converted to O-glucuronide(s)
in the presence of UDPGA and UGTs in the incubation buffer. The reaction
was quenched by 1% formic acid and extracted with ethyl acetate. The
organic phase was then dried and dissolved in MeOH for LC-MS/MS analysis
(positive ion mode, MS2 spectrum of isomer M1 and MS2 spectrum of isomer M2). The structure of the M2 metabolite
is shown.
Figure 6
LC-MS/MS detection of O-monoglucuronsyl-B[a]P-7,8-catechols (M1 and M2) formed by recombinant UGT1A1
(A), 1A3 (B), 2B7 (C), and by A549 (D) at 24 h. B[a]P-7,8-catechol (20 μM) was generated in situ under anaerobic conditions in the presence of 1 mM dithiothreitol.
B[a]P-7,8-catechol was converted to the O-glucuronide(s) in the presence of UDPGA and UGTs in the incubation
buffer (A, UGT1A1; B, UGT1A3; and C, UGT2B7). (D) B[a]P-7,8-dione (2 μM, 0.2% DMSO) in HBSS medium was incubated
with A549 cells and the culture media collected at 0 and 24 h, respectively.
The culture media were acidified by formic acid and extracted with
ethyl acetate. The organic phases were dried under vacuum and redissolved
in methanol. O-Monoglucuronsyl-B[a]P-7,8-catechols were analyzed with LC-MS/MS in a negative ion mode
by monitoring the mass transition m/z 459 → 283 ([M – H]− → [M
– H-glucuronic acid group]−).
LC/MS/MS identification of O-monoglucuronsyl-B[a]P-7,8-catechols (M1 and M2). B[a]P-7,8-catechol
(20 μM) was generated in situ under anaerobic
conditions in the presence of 1 mM dithiothreitol. B[a]P-7,8-catechol was converted to O-glucuronide(s)
in the presence of UDPGA and UGTs in the incubation buffer. The reaction
was quenched by 1% formic acid and extracted with ethyl acetate. The
organic phase was then dried and dissolved in MeOH for LC-MS/MS analysis
(positive ion mode, MS2 spectrum of isomer M1 and MS2 spectrum of isomer M2). The structure of the M2 metabolite
is shown.LC-MS/MS detection of O-monoglucuronsyl-B[a]P-7,8-catechols (M1 and M2) formed by recombinant UGT1A1
(A), 1A3 (B), 2B7 (C), and by A549 (D) at 24 h. B[a]P-7,8-catechol (20 μM) was generated in situ under anaerobic conditions in the presence of 1 mM dithiothreitol.
B[a]P-7,8-catechol was converted to the O-glucuronide(s) in the presence of UDPGA and UGTs in the incubation
buffer (A, UGT1A1; B, UGT1A3; and C, UGT2B7). (D) B[a]P-7,8-dione (2 μM, 0.2% DMSO) in HBSS medium was incubated
with A549 cells and the culture media collected at 0 and 24 h, respectively.
The culture media were acidified by formic acid and extracted with
ethyl acetate. The organic phases were dried under vacuum and redissolved
in methanol. O-Monoglucuronsyl-B[a]P-7,8-catechols were analyzed with LC-MS/MS in a negative ion mode
by monitoring the mass transition m/z 459 → 283 ([M – H]− → [M
– H-glucuronic acid group]−).To elucidate the steady state
kinetic properties of the recombinant
UGTs to glucuronidateB[a]P-7,8-catechol, we performed
discontinuous assays to monitor the initial velocity of conjugate
formation using [14C]-UDPGA as the cofactor. Because of
substrate solubility, the substrate concentration was limited to 0–20
μM. B[a]P-7,8-Catechol glucuronidation catalyzed
by UGT1A1, 1A3, and 2B7 followed Michaelis–Menten kinetics
(Figure 7). Apparent utilization ratios (Vmaxapp/Km) showed
that UGT1A1 Supersomes were the most catalytically efficient for the
glucuronidation of B[a]P-7,8-catechol, followed by
UGT1A3 and 2B7 Supersomes (Table 2). The Km values of UGT1A1 and 1A3 were 9.6 and 8.5
μM, respectively, which were slightly lower than that of UGT2B7
at 16.3 μM indicating that the substrate concentration at which
half maximal velocity was observed was similar in each case.
Figure 7
Kinetic characterization
of glucuronidation of B[a]P-7,8-catechol by UGTs.
Kinetic analyses were performed by fitting
the Michaelis–Menten equation to the data. Reactions contained
10 mM KPO4 buffer at pH 7.4, 1.0 mM dithiothreitol, 5.0
mM MgCl2, 1 mM [14C]UDPGA, 0–20 μM
B[a]P-7,8-dione, and 15–30 μg of human
recombinant UGT Supersomes at 25 °C. A, B, and C, velocity versus
[S] curve for the glucuronidation of B[a]P-7,8-catechol
by UGT1A1, 1A3, and 2B7, respectively.
Table 2
Kinetic Constants of Glucuronidation
of B[a]P-7,8-Catechol
enzymes
Vmax (μM/min/mg)
Km (μM)
Vmax/Km(min–1 mg–1)
UGT1A1
2.9 ± 0.25
9.60 ± 1.97
0.3
UGT1A3
1.1 ± 0.1
8.50 ± 1.65
0.12
UGT2B7
0.75 ± 0.1
16.3 ± 3 0.5
0.5
Kinetic characterization
of glucuronidation of B[a]P-7,8-catecholby UGTs.
Kinetic analyses were performed by fitting
the Michaelis–Menten equation to the data. Reactions contained
10 mM KPO4 buffer at pH 7.4, 1.0 mM dithiothreitol, 5.0
mM MgCl2, 1 mM [14C]UDPGA, 0–20 μM
B[a]P-7,8-dione, and 15–30 μg of human
recombinant UGT Supersomes at 25 °C. A, B, and C, velocity versus
[S] curve for the glucuronidation of B[a]P-7,8-catecholby UGT1A1, 1A3, and 2B7, respectively.
Glucuronidation of B[a]P-7,8-Catechol in Human
Lung Cells Treated with 2 μM B[a]P-7,8-Dione
Only one O8-monoglucuronsyl-B[a]P-7,8-catechol (M2) was detected by LC-MS/MS in the SRM mode in
A549 cells after incubation of the cells with 2 μM B[a]P-7,8-dione for 24 h. By contrast, O-monoglucuronsyl-B[a]P-7,8-catechol was not detected in H358 and HBEC-KT cell
lines, which was consistent with the low mRNA level of UGTs in these
cell lines (Figures 2 and 6D).
Discussion
We have been conducting
a systematic study to elucidate the roles
of human enzymes in catalyzing the redox cycling of PAH o-quinones and the roles of phase II enzymes in conjugating PAH catechols
that arise from the AKR pathway of PAH activation. Previous studies
have shown that AKRs are efficient PAH o-quinone
reductases[17] and that the PAH catechols
formed can be intercepted by COMTs and SULTs.[24,25] We now show that UGT1A1, 1A3, and 2B7 are all expressed in A549
cells. Of these, UGT1A3 and 2B7 are the enzymes most likely involved
in B[a]P-7,8-catechol glucuronidation based on the
glucuronide product profile. While recombinant UGT1A1 expressed in
Supersomes produces two regioisomeric monoglucuronides with B[a]P-7,8-catechol, only one of the isomers is produced in
A549 cells and corresponds to the single isomer produced by UGT1A3
and UGT2B7. The monoglucuronide formed is tentatively assigned as O8-monoglucuronsyl-B[a]P-7,8-catecholbased
on differences in retention time observed for the regioisomeric O-monosulfated B[a]P-7,8-catechols.[25]It is noteworthy that UGT2B7 is also the
dominant isoform involved
in the glucuronidation of the structurally related catechol estrogens.[42] UGT2B7 catalyzes the glucuronidation of 4-hydroxycatecholestrogens
(hydroxylated estrone/estradiol), which are structurally similar to
B[a]P-7,8-catechol.[44] The
glucuronidation of 4-hydroxycatecholestrogens shows preference for
the C4-hydroxyl group, which would be equivalent to the C7 position
of B[a]P-7,8-catechol. Although UGT1A1 was found
in the kinetic analysis to have the highest utilization ratio (Vmax/Km) and catalyzed
the formation of both regioisomeric B[a]P-7,8-catecholglucuronides, no significant M1 was found in A549 cells indicating
that it did not contribute to the detoxication of this catechol in
these cells.It is noteworthy that only A549 cells expressed
the UGT isoforms
studied to any extent. The low expression of UGTs might be anticipated
due to the low level of expression previously reported in human lung
specimens. Zheng at al. measured the expression of multiple UGTs in
32 human lung tissues by duplex RT-PCR and found that UGT1A1, UGT1A3,
UGT1A4, UGT1A6, UGT1A7, UGT1A8, UGT1A9, and UGT1A10 were not expressed.[29] Similarly, UGT2B4, UGT2B7, UGT2B15, and UGT2B17
were not detected. In later studies, Dillinger et al. showed that
UGT1A10 was found in low amounts in human lung specimens.[45] The difference in UGT isoform expression observed
in our study versus that observed in the earlier work could reflect
differences in measuring UGT expression in humanbronchial epithelial
cells versus whole lung tissue. Other UGTs that could have been included
in our study would be UGT2B10, but up until now, this has only been
shown in glucuronidatetobacco specific nitrosamines.[46]The formation of regioisomeric O-monoglucuronides
of B[a]P-7,8-catechol also deserves comment. UGT1A1,
UGT1A9, and UGT2B7, which are predominately expressed in the liver,
were found to form the 7S-monoglucuronide from (±)-B[a]P-7,8-trans-dihydrodiol, whereas the
extrahepatic UGT1A7, UGT1A8, and UGT1A10 could form either the 7R-monoglucuronide or the 8S-monoglucuronide,
i.e., they produce two different enantiomers.[36] By contrast, UGT1A1 formed two different regioisomeric B[a]P-7,8-catechol monoglucuronides, whereas UGT1A3 and UGT2B7
produced a single regioisomeric O-monoglucuronsyl-B[a]P-7,8-catechol. The ability of UGTs to form different
enantiomers from B[a]P-7,8-trans-dihydrodiol may be related to the fact that the dihydrodiol is nonplanar
and has both axial and equatorial alcohols. By contrast, the catechol
is planar, and only different regioisomers are allowed. No bis-glucuronide
has been observed with either B[a]P-7,8-trans-dihydrodiol or B[a]P-7,8-catechol possibly due
to steric hindrance.We next compared the specific activities
for the redox cycling
of B[a]P-7,8-dione catalyzed by AKRs, with the specific
activities observed for O-methylation, O-sulfation, and O-glucuronidation of B[a]P-7,8-catechol catalyzed by COMTs, SULTs, and UGTs in Table 3. These data reveal that the rates of redox cycling
are much greater than the rates of phase II conjugating reactions.
Although some uncertainties exist in this comparison due to the differences
in expression levels of these enzymes in specific cells, it is unlikely
that these will account for the >6,000-fold difference in the specific
activities of NQO1 and UGT1A3 to use B[a]P-7,8-dione
and B[a]P-7,8-catechol as substrates, respectively.
Thus, the ability to intercept the PAH catechols and prevent redox
cycling is not an efficient process and could be easily overwhelmed
in a cellular environment. This is supported by earlier work in which
we showed that B[a]P-7,8-trans-dihydrodiol
(AKR substrate) and B[a]P-7,8-dione (AKR product)
produced significant ROS and 8-oxo-dGuo formation in A549 cells.[23]
Table 3
Comparison of Rates
of PAH o-Quinone Redox Cycling with Rates of Phase
II Conjugation
Reactionsa
recombinant enzyme
specific activityb (nmol/min/mg)
NQO1
1070c
AKR7A2
1270c
AKR1C1
64c
sCOMT
55d
SULT1A1
0.8d
UGT1A1
0.3d
UGT 1A3
0.16d
UGT2B7
0.06d
The values were taken from refs (17, 24, and 25).
Substrate concentration was 10 μM
B[a]P-7,8-dione.
Six replicates with SD < 10%.
From Michaelis–Menton plots.
The values were taken from refs (17, 24, and 25).Substrate concentration was 10 μM
B[a]P-7,8-dione.Six replicates with SD < 10%.From Michaelis–Menton plots.Although UGTs were not detected
in HBEC-KT, H358, and BEAS-2B under
current culture conditions, the contribution of UGTs in human lung
cells to B[a]P-7,8-catechol conjugation may be affected
by the induction of UGTs. Cigarette smoke increases UGT activity.[47,48] It has been proposed that the expression level of UGT1A4 in the
human small airway epithelium was elevated as a result of nuclear
factor erythroid 2 p45-related factors (Nrf2) activation. However,
UGT1A4 does not appear to be responsible for B[a]P-7,8-catechol
glucuronidation in our experiments to date.[49] It has also been demonstrated that UGT1A10 and UGT1A8 are coordinately
regulated by the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) and Nrf2 and that
the Nrf2 response requires the presence of AhR.[50] Both PAHs and PAH o-quinones such as B[a]P-7,8-dione are the ligands of the AhR, which is required
for the induction of UGTs by Nrf2.[51−53] With the induction of
UGTs, the detoxification of B[a]P-7,8-dioneby UGTs
in smokers could become more significant.The AKR1C genes involved in the formation and
redox cycling of PAH o-quinones are also highly induced
by the Nrf2-Keap 1 system.[54,55] Inducers that activate
Nrf2 include electrophiles and ROS and not surprisingly PAH o-quinones. Thus, the induction of AKR1C genes with the products of PAH-trans-dihydrodiol
oxidation, namely, PAH o-quinones, could lead to
an exacerbation of ROS formation which may not be easily countered
by UGT induction.
Authors: Erin P Madeen; Ted J Ognibene; Richard A Corley; Tammie J McQuistan; Marilyn C Henderson; William M Baird; Graham Bench; Ken W Turteltaub; David E Williams Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2016-09-09 Impact factor: 3.739
Authors: Meng Huang; Clementina Mesaros; Linda C Hackfeld; Richard P Hodge; Tianzhu Zang; Ian A Blair; Trevor M Penning Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2017-03-22 Impact factor: 3.739
Authors: Meng Huang; Li Zhang; Clementina Mesaros; Linda C Hackfeld; Richard P Hodge; Ian A Blair; Trevor M Penning Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2015-10-05 Impact factor: 3.739
Authors: Meng Huang; Clementina Mesaros; Linda C Hackfeld; Richard P Hodge; Ian A Blair; Trevor M Penning Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2017-10-27 Impact factor: 3.739
Authors: Jolantha Beyerle; Andreana N Holowatyj; Mariam Haffa; Eva Frei; Biljana Gigic; Petra Schrotz-King; Juergen Boehm; Nina Habermann; Marie Stiborova; Dominique Scherer; Torsten Kölsch; Stephanie Skender; Nikolaus Becker; Esther Herpel; Martin Schneider; Alexis Ulrich; Peter Schirmacher; Jenny Chang-Claude; Hermann Brenner; Michael Hoffmeister; Ulrike Haug; Robert W Owen; Cornelia M Ulrich Journal: Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev Date: 2019-11-18 Impact factor: 4.254
Authors: Meng Huang; Li Zhang; Clementina Mesaros; Suhong Zhang; Michael A Blaha; Ian A Blair; Trevor M Penning Journal: Chem Res Toxicol Date: 2014-03-31 Impact factor: 3.739