Literature DB >> 2404719

Variation in absorption of NPH insulin due to intramuscular injection.

A Vaag1, A Handberg, M Lauritzen, J E Henriksen, K D Pedersen, H Beck-Nielsen.   

Abstract

To evaluate the importance of accidental intramuscular injection of NPH insulin, we measured disappearance rates of 125I-labeled NPH insulin (Protaphane) from subcutaneous and intramuscular injection sites in the thighs of 11 insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus patients. Both subcutaneous and intramuscular absorption rates were measured four times in each patient. NPH insulin was absorbed much faster when given intramuscularly than when given subcutaneously (T50% = 5.3 vs. 10.3 h, P less than 0.0001). The intrapatient (day-to-day) coefficient of variation (C.V.) of T50% values (C.V. T50%) for subcutaneously injected NPH insulin in this study, where all injections were guided by ultrasound determination of the subcutaneous fat layer, was 18.4%. Intrapatient variation of absorption was significantly lower for subcutaneously than intramuscularly injected NPH insulin (C.V. T50% = 18.4 vs. 29.8%, P less than 0.01) and was also lower than interpatient variation for subcutaneously injected insulin (C.V. T50% = 18.4 vs. 50%, P less than 0.0001). The faster absorption rate and shorter duration of action, together with the higher day-to-day variation in absorption, led us to conclude that intramuscular injection of NPH insulin should be avoided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2404719     DOI: 10.2337/diacare.13.1.74

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Diabetes Care        ISSN: 0149-5992            Impact factor:   19.112


  15 in total

Review 1.  Insulin injection technique.

Authors:  J Thow; P Home
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1990-07-07

Review 2.  Diabetes mellitus.

Authors:  A B Johnson; R Taylor
Journal:  Postgrad Med J       Date:  1990-12       Impact factor: 2.401

3.  Sources of glycemic variability--what type of technology is needed?

Authors:  Jonas Kildegaard; Toke Folke Christensen; Ole Kristian Hejlesen
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2009-07-01

4.  Evaluating the Impact of Human Factors and Pen Needle Design on Insulin Pen Injection.

Authors:  Christopher Rini; Bruce C Roberts; Didier Morel; Rick Klug; Benjamin Selvage; Ronald J Pettis
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2019-03-17

5.  An analysis of the mixing efficiency of neutral protamine Hagedorn cartridges.

Authors:  Scott V Monte; Patrick Comerford; Natalie Dearing
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2010-05-01

6.  Impact of injection sites for soluble insulin on glycaemic control in type 1 (insulin-dependent) diabetic patients treated with a multiple insulin injection regimen.

Authors:  J E Henriksen; M S Djurhuus; A Vaag; P Thye-Rønn; D Knudsen; O Hother-Nielsen; H Beck-Nielsen
Journal:  Diabetologia       Date:  1993-08       Impact factor: 10.122

7.  Identification and comparison of insulin pharmacokinetics injected with a new 4-mm needle vs 6- and 8-mm needles accounting for endogenous insulin and C-peptide secretion kinetics in non-diabetic adult males.

Authors:  Takahisa Hirose; Takeshi Ogihara; Shusaku Tozaka; Sami Kanderian; Hirotaka Watada
Journal:  J Diabetes Investig       Date:  2013-02-13       Impact factor: 4.232

8.  Indian Injection Technique Study: Population Characteristics and Injection Practices.

Authors:  Sanjay Kalra; Ambrish Mithal; Rakesh Sahay; Mathew John; A G Unnikrishnan; Banshi Saboo; Sujoy Ghosh; Debmalya Sanyal; Laurence J Hirsch; Vandita Gupta; Kenneth W Strauss
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2017-03-13       Impact factor: 2.945

Review 9.  Reducing medication errors in critical care: a multimodal approach.

Authors:  Rachel M Kruer; Andrew S Jarrell; Asad Latif
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2014-09-01

10.  Insulin Injection Technique in China Compared with the Rest of the World.

Authors:  Zhenqiang Song; Xiaohui Guo; Linong Ji; Xiao Huang; Laurence J Hirsch; Kenneth W Strauss
Journal:  Diabetes Ther       Date:  2018-10-30       Impact factor: 2.945

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.