Literature DB >> 24046471

Comparison between colour duplex sonography findings and different histological patterns of temporal artery.

Francesco Muratore1, Luigi Boiardi, Giovanna Restuccia, Pierluigi Macchioni, Giulia Pazzola, Alberto Nicolini, Giuseppe Germanò, Niccolò Possemato, Alberto Cavazza, Silvio Cavuto, Luca Cimino, Nicolò Pipitone, Mariagrazia Catanoso, Olga Addimanda, Carlo Salvarani.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To assess the findings of temporal artery colour duplex sonography (CDS) in GCA characterized by a histological pattern of periadventitial small vessel vasculitis (SVV) and/or vasa vasorum vasculitis (VVV) and compare it with those observed in classic GCA with transmural vasculitis.
METHODS: We studied 30 patients with SVV and/or VVV, 63 patients with classic GCA and 67 biopsy-negative patients identified over a 9-year period. CDS of the temporal arteries was performed in all patients by one ultrasonographer. Temporal artery biopsy was used as the reference standard. Sensitivities, specificities and likelihood ratios (LRs) were calculated.
RESULTS: The frequency of the halo sign on CDS was significantly lower in the patients with SVV and/or VVV compared with those with classic GCA (20% vs 82.5%, P = 0.0001). The halo sign had a sensitivity of only 20% (95% CI 8.4, 39.1%) and a specificity of 80.6% (95% CI 68.7, 88.9%) for the diagnosis of SVV and/or VVV. The negative LR was 0.992 (CI 0.824, 1.195), and the positive LR was 1.030 (CI 0.433, 2.451). The halo sign for the diagnosis of biopsy-proven classic GCA had a higher sensitivity of 82.5% (CI 70.5, 90.5%), the same specificity of 80.6% (CI 68.7, 88.9%) and a higher positive LR (4.253; CI 2.577, 7.021).
CONCLUSION: The halo sign is infrequently found in GCA characterized by a histological pattern of SVV and/or VVV. This limits the sensitivity of CDS in correctly identifying patients with GCA.

Entities:  

Keywords:  giant cell arteritis; halo; periadventitial small-vessel vasculitis; transmural vasculitis; ultrasonography

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24046471     DOI: 10.1093/rheumatology/ket258

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)        ISSN: 1462-0324            Impact factor:   7.580


  10 in total

Review 1.  The use of ultrasound to assess giant cell arteritis: review of the current evidence and practical guide for the rheumatologist.

Authors:  Sara Monti; Alberto Floris; Cristina Ponte; Wolfgang A Schmidt; Andreas P Diamantopoulos; Claudio Pereira; Jennifer Piper; Raashid Luqmani
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2018-02-01       Impact factor: 7.580

2.  The value of ultrasound in diagnosing extracranial large-vessel vasculitis compared to FDG-PET/CT: A retrospective study.

Authors:  Christian Löffler; Johannes Hoffend; Urs Benck; Bernhard K Krämer; Raoul Bergner
Journal:  Clin Rheumatol       Date:  2017-05-15       Impact factor: 2.980

3.  Predictive value of positive temporal artery biopsies in patients with clinically suspected giant cell arteritis considering temporal artery ultrasound findings.

Authors:  Falk Sommer; Eberhard Spörl; Robert Herber; Lutz E Pillunat; Naim Terai
Journal:  Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol       Date:  2019-08-15       Impact factor: 3.117

Review 4.  Imaging in Giant Cell Arteritis.

Authors:  Asad Khan; Bhaskar Dasgupta
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 4.592

5.  Description and Validation of Histological Patterns and Proposal of a Dynamic Model of Inflammatory Infiltration in Giant-cell Arteritis.

Authors:  José Hernández-Rodríguez; Giuseppe Murgia; Irama Villar; Elías Campo; Sarah L Mackie; Aruna Chakrabarty; Elizabeth M A Hensor; Ann W Morgan; Carme Font; Sergio Prieto-González; Georgina Espígol-Frigolé; Josep M Grau; Maria C Cid
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-02       Impact factor: 1.889

6.  Role of the halo sign in the assessment of giant cell arteritis: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Alwin Sebastian; Fiona Coath; Sue Innes; Jo Jackson; Kornelis S M van der Geest; Bhaskar Dasgupta
Journal:  Rheumatol Adv Pract       Date:  2021-08-19

7.  Ultrasound intima media thickness cut-off values for cranial and extracranial arteries in patients with suspected giant cell arteritis.

Authors:  Katerine López-Gloria; Isabel Castrejón; Juan Carlos Nieto-González; Pablo Rodríguez-Merlos; Belén Serrano-Benavente; Carlos Manuel González; Indalecio Monteagudo Sáez; Teresa González; José María Álvaro-Gracia; Juan Molina-Collada
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-26

8.  The Utility of Color Duplex Ultrasonography in the Diagnosis of Giant Cell Arteritis: A Prospective, Masked Study. (An American Ophthalmological Society Thesis).

Authors:  Jurij R Bilyk; Ann P Murchison; Benjamin T Leiby; Robert C Sergott; Ralph C Eagle; Laurence Needleman; Peter J Savino
Journal:  Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc       Date:  2018-06-25

9.  Definitions and reliability assessment of elementary ultrasound lesions in giant cell arteritis: a study from the OMERACT Large Vessel Vasculitis Ultrasound Working Group.

Authors:  Stavros Chrysidis; Christina Duftner; Christian Dejaco; Valentin S Schäfer; Sofia Ramiro; Greta Carrara; Carlo Alberto Scirè; Alojzija Hocevar; Andreas P Diamantopoulos; Annamaria Iagnocco; Chetan Mukhtyar; Cristina Ponte; Esperanza Naredo; Eugenio De Miguel; George A Bruyn; Kenneth J Warrington; Lene Terslev; Marcin Milchert; Maria Antonietta D'Agostino; Mattew J Koster; Naina Rastalsky; Petra Hanova; Pierluigi Macchioni; Tanaz A Kermani; Tove Lorenzen; Uffe Møller Døhn; Ulrich Fredberg; Wolfgang Hartung; Bhaskar Dasgupta; Wolfgang A Schmidt
Journal:  RMD Open       Date:  2018-05-17

10.  Diagnostic performance and utility of very high-resolution ultrasonography in diagnosing giant cell arteritis of the temporal artery.

Authors:  Johnny K M Sundholm; Tom Pettersson; Anders Paetau; Anders Albäck; Taisto Sarkola
Journal:  Rheumatol Adv Pract       Date:  2019-07-05
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.