Literature DB >> 24046223

Meta-analysis of diagnostic performance studies.

M G Myriam Hunink1.   

Abstract

Mesh：

Year:  2013        PMID： 24046223     DOI： 10.1007/s10654-013-9846-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol        ISSN： 0393-2990            Impact factor:   8.082


× No keyword cloud information.
  3 in total

1.  Empirical evidence of design-related bias in studies of diagnostic tests.

Authors:  J G Lijmer; B W Mol; S Heisterkamp; G J Bonsel; M H Prins; J H van der Meulen; P M Bossuyt
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1999-09-15       Impact factor: 56.272

2.  The impact of including different study designs in meta-analyses of diagnostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Lucy A Parker; Noemí Gómez Saez; Miquel Porta; Ildefonso Hernández-Aguado; Blanca Lumbreras
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2012-12-27       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Evidence of bias and variation in diagnostic accuracy studies.

Authors:  Anne W S Rutjes; Johannes B Reitsma; Marcello Di Nisio; Nynke Smidt; Jeroen C van Rijn; Patrick M M Bossuyt
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2006-02-14       Impact factor: 8.262
  3 in total
  1 in total

1.  The Rotterdam Study: 2016 objectives and design update.

Authors:  Albert Hofman; Guy G O Brusselle; Sarwa Darwish Murad; Cornelia M van Duijn; Oscar H Franco; André Goedegebure; M Arfan Ikram; Caroline C W Klaver; Tamar E C Nijsten; Robin P Peeters; Bruno H Ch Stricker; Henning W Tiemeier; André G Uitterlinden; Meike W Vernooij
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-09-19       Impact factor: 8.082
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.