Literature DB >> 24046175

Outcomes of peritoneal dialysis catheter reinsertion: does the cause of initial removal matter?

Aydin Unal1, Tamer Arikan, Ismail Kocyigit, Murat Hayri Sipahioglu, Bulent Tokgoz, Oktay Oymak.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: In this study, we aimed to compare patient and technique survival between the patients, in whom peritoneal dialysis (PD) catheter was removed due to severe peritonitis and then it was reinserted, and those, in whom PD catheter was removed due to non-peritonitis causes and then it was reinserted.
METHOD: Sixty-two patients, in whom PD catheter was reinserted surgically, were retrospectively analyzed in this cohort study. Group 1 consisted of 27 patients in whom PD catheter was removed due to severe peritonitis, whereas Group 2 consisted of 35 patients in whom PD catheter was removed due to non-peritonitis causes.
RESULTS: There was no significant difference between Group 1 and Group 2 in terms of the estimation of overall patient survival [43 months (95 % CI 43.6-83.7) versus 80 months (95 % CI 52.8-107.3, p 0.362]. Similarly, there was no significant difference between Group 1 and Group 2 in terms of the estimation of overall technique survival [82 months (95 % CI 0-166.0) versus 31 months (95 % CI 9.7-52.3), p 0.346].
CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that there was no significant effect of causes of PD catheter removal (peritonitis vs. non-peritonitis) on the outcomes of PD treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24046175     DOI: 10.1007/s11255-013-0558-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol        ISSN: 0301-1623            Impact factor:   2.370


  7 in total

1.  Peritoneal dialysis-related infections recommendations: 2010 update.

Authors:  Philip Kam-Tao Li; Cheuk Chun Szeto; Beth Piraino; Judith Bernardini; Ana E Figueiredo; Amit Gupta; David W Johnson; Ed J Kuijper; Wai-Choong Lye; William Salzer; Franz Schaefer; Dirk G Struijk
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2010 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.756

2.  Simultaneous catheter replacement and removal in refractory peritoneal dialysis infections.

Authors:  R Swartz; J Messana; J Reynolds; U Ranjit
Journal:  Kidney Int       Date:  1991-12       Impact factor: 10.612

3.  Simultaneous catheter removal and reinsertion in fungal peritonitis.

Authors:  S Guditi; N Prasad; V D Kaligotla
Journal:  Perit Dial Int       Date:  2008 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 1.756

4.  Outcome of patients on chronic peritoneal dialysis undergoing peritoneal catheter removal because of peritonitis.

Authors:  Laura Troidle; Nancy Gorban-Brennan; Fredric O Finkelstein
Journal:  Adv Perit Dial       Date:  2005

5.  Feasibility of resuming peritoneal dialysis after severe peritonitis and Tenckhoff catheter removal.

Authors:  Cheuk-Chun Szeto; Kai-Ming Chow; Teresa Yuk-Hwa Wong; Chi-Bon Leung; Angela Yee-Moon Wang; Siu-Fai Lui; Philip Kam-Tao Li
Journal:  J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 10.121

Review 6.  Clinical value of standardized equilibration tests in CAPD patients.

Authors:  Z J Twardowski
Journal:  Blood Purif       Date:  1989       Impact factor: 2.614

7.  Clinical characteristics of dialysis related sclerosing encapsulating peritonitis: multi-center experience in Korea.

Authors:  Beom Seok Kim; Hoon Young Choi; Dong-Ryeol Ryu; Tae Hyun Yoo; Hyeong Cheon Park; Shin Wook Kang; Kyu Hun Choi; Sung Kyu Ha; Dae Suk Han; Ho Yung Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2005-02-28       Impact factor: 2.759

  7 in total
  1 in total

Review 1.  Pull technique versus open surgical removal of the catheter for peritoneal dialysis: a retrospective cohort study.

Authors:  Qi Ding; Bo Zhang; Min Liu; Xiaoyu Li; Lili Zuo
Journal:  Clin Exp Nephrol       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 2.617

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.