Literature DB >> 24046079

Listener-speaker perceived distance predicts the degree of motor contribution to speech perception.

Eleonora Bartoli1, Alessandro D'Ausilio1, Jeffrey Berry2, Leonardo Badino1, Thomas Bever3, Luciano Fadiga4.   

Abstract

Listening speech sounds activates motor and premotor areas in addition to temporal and parietal brain regions. These activations are somatotopically localized according to the effectors recruited in the production of particular phonemes. Previous work demonstrated that transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) of speech motor centers somatotopically altered speech perception, suggesting a role for the motor system. However, these effects seemed to occur only under adverse listening conditions, suggesting that degraded speech may stimulate listeners to adopt unnatural neural strategies relying on motor centers. Here, we investigated whether naturally occurring interspeaker variability, which did not affect task difficulty, made a speech discrimination task sensitive to TMS interference. In this paradigm, TMS over tongue and lips motor representations somatotopically altered the discrimination time of speech. Furthermore, the TMS-induced effect correlated with listeners' similarity judgments between listeners' and speakers' speech productions. Thus, the degree of motor recruitment depends on the perceived distance between listener and speaker. This result supports the claim that discriminating others' speech pattern requires the contribution of the listener's own motor repertoire. We conclude that motor recruitment in speech perception can be a natural product of discriminating speech in a normally variable and unpredictable environment, not merely related to task difficulty.
© The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Keywords:  TMS; interspeaker variability; motor system; motor theory; speech perception

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24046079     DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bht257

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cereb Cortex        ISSN: 1047-3211            Impact factor:   5.357


  13 in total

1.  The neural oscillatory markers of phonetic convergence during verbal interaction.

Authors:  Sankar Mukherjee; Leonardo Badino; Pauline M Hilt; Alice Tomassini; Alberto Inuggi; Luciano Fadiga; Noël Nguyen; Alessandro D'Ausilio
Journal:  Hum Brain Mapp       Date:  2018-09-21       Impact factor: 5.038

2.  Listening to speech recruits specific tongue motor synergies as revealed by transcranial magnetic stimulation and tissue-Doppler ultrasound imaging.

Authors:  A D'Ausilio; L Maffongelli; E Bartoli; M Campanella; E Ferrari; J Berry; L Fadiga
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 6.237

3.  Brain networks engaged in audiovisual integration during speech perception revealed by persistent homology-based network filtration.

Authors:  Heejung Kim; Jarang Hahm; Hyekyoung Lee; Eunjoo Kang; Hyejin Kang; Dong Soo Lee
Journal:  Brain Connect       Date:  2015-03-02

Review 4.  An interactive model of auditory-motor speech perception.

Authors:  Einat Liebenthal; Riikka Möttönen
Journal:  Brain Lang       Date:  2017-12-18       Impact factor: 2.381

5.  Dissociating Contributions of the Motor Cortex to Speech Perception and Response Bias by Using Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation.

Authors:  Eleonore H M Smalle; Jack Rogers; Riikka Möttönen
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-10-01       Impact factor: 5.357

6.  Do We Perceive Others Better than Ourselves? A Perceptual Benefit for Noise-Vocoded Speech Produced by an Average Speaker.

Authors:  William L Schuerman; Antje Meyer; James M McQueen
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-02       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Causal Influence of Articulatory Motor Cortex on Comprehending Single Spoken Words: TMS Evidence.

Authors:  Malte R Schomers; Evgeniya Kirilina; Anne Weigand; Malek Bajbouj; Friedemann Pulvermüller
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 5.357

8.  Motor Recruitment during Action Observation: Effect of Interindividual Differences in Action Strategy.

Authors:  P M Hilt; P Cardellicchio; E Dolfini; T Pozzo; L Fadiga; A D'Ausilio
Journal:  Cereb Cortex       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 5.357

Review 9.  Neural bases of accented speech perception.

Authors:  Patti Adank; Helen E Nuttall; Briony Banks; Daniel Kennedy-Higgins
Journal:  Front Hum Neurosci       Date:  2015-10-06       Impact factor: 3.169

10.  Discrimination of speech and non-speech sounds following theta-burst stimulation of the motor cortex.

Authors:  Jack C Rogers; Riikka Möttönen; Rowan Boyles; Kate E Watkins
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2014-07-15
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.