| Literature DB >> 24045659 |
T Osawa1, N Ohga, K Akiyama, Y Hida, K Kitayama, T Kawamoto, K Yamamoto, N Maishi, M Kondoh, Y Onodera, M Fujie, N Shinohara, K Nonomura, M Shindoh, K Hida.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Molecules that are highly expressed in tumour endothelial cells (TECs) may be candidates for specifically targeting TECs. Using DNA microarray analysis, we found that the lysyl oxidase (LOX) gene was upregulated in TECs compared with its expression in normal endothelial cells (NECs). LOX is an enzyme that enhances invasion and metastasis of tumour cells. However, there are no reports on the function of LOX in isolated TECs.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24045659 PMCID: PMC3798951 DOI: 10.1038/bjc.2013.535
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Br J Cancer ISSN: 0007-0920 Impact factor: 7.640
Figure 1LOX expression in mTECs. (A) Characterisation of mTECs and mNECs. FACS analysis of BS1-B4 lectin binding and CD31, CD105 and CD144 expression (white areas). Isotype controls are shown as black areas. All ECs were negative for the monocyte marker CD11b and the hematopoietic marker CD45. Human HB-EGF mRNA expression was found in human tumour cells but not in mouse ECs. (B) LOX mRNA is upregulated in mTECs, as determined by qPCR. **P<0.01 vs mNECs (means±s.d.). (C) Western blotting revealed that LOX protein expression is upregulated in mTECs. *P<0.05 vs mNECs (means±s.d.). (D) LOX activity is higher in mTECs than in mNECs using Amplex Red. *P<0.05 vs mNECs (means±s.d.).
Figure 2LOX is upregulated in tumour blood vessels Immunostaining for the endothelial markers CD31 and LOX in tumours (A375SM) and in mouse normal tissues (dermal tissue). Merged staining (white arrow) shows co-localisation of LOX (green) and CD31 (red) in situ. DAPI stain: Nuclei. Scale bar=50 μm.
Figure 3LOX knockdown by LOX siRNA in mTECs. (A) qPCR for LOX mRNA in mTECs transfected with siRNA. (B) LOX protein silencing was determined by western blotting at 48 h after transfection. LOX protein levels were normalised to that of β-actin and analysed using scanning densitometry using the NIH ImageJ software. *P<0.05 vs control (means±s.d.). LOX activity is decreased in LOX-knockdown mTECs. *P<0.05 vs control (means±s.d.). (C) Phenotypic changes in mTECs after LOX knockdown. Migration paths of siRNA-transfected mTECs. Each axis tick represents a distance of 50 μm. The migration distance of mTECs transfected with siRNA was analysed. **P<0.01 vs control (means±s.d.; n=10 per group). (D) Immunostaining for actin organization in mTECs after staining with F-actin (green) and vinculin (red, white arrow). mTECs transfected with siRNA were examined by immunostaining. DAPI stain: Nuclei. Scale bar=10 μm. Ratio of cell length to cell width. **P<0.01 vs control (means±s.d.; n=10 per group). Vinculin was quantified in siRNA-transfected mTECs. **P<0.01 vs control (means±s.d.; n=10 per group).
Figure 4( GAPDH was used as an internal loading control. The levels of FAK phosphorylated at Tyr 397 were normalised to total FAK using the NIH ImageJ software. *P<0.05 vs control (means±s.d.). (B) Effects of FAK inhibition on mTEC tube formation. Scale bar=100 μm. (C) Effects of LOX knockdown on mTEC tube formation. Tube formation was analysed using the NIH ImageJ software. *P<0.05 vs control (means±s.d.). Diagram summarising tube lengths from three randomly selected light microscopic fields. Scale bar=100 μm. *P<0.05 vs corresponding control (means±s.d.).
Figure 5(A) Vascularisation within a primary A375SM tumour was assessed by CD31 immunostaining. Scale bar=100 μm. For microvascular density (MVD) analysis, the areas of vessels in CD31-stained sections were determined using the ImageJ software. *P<0.05 vs control (means±s.d.; n=15 per group). (B) BAPN treatment decreased the numbers of circulating tumour cells (CTCs) in tumour-bearing mice. (means±s.d.; n=3 per group). (C) Metastatic colonies in lungs were visualised by staining with anti-human Ki-67. BAPN treatment suppressed tumour metastasis. Scale bar=100 μm. The numbers of tumour colonies in lungs, defined as >20 anti-human Ki-67 cells/area, decreased in BAPN-treated mice. *P<0.05 vs control (means±s.d.; n=9 per group).
Background of renal cell carcinoma (RCC) samples
| 1 | F | 53 | T1a, Nx, M0 | Clear cell | G3, INFa, v(−) |
| 2 | F | 66 | T3b, N1, M1 | Clear cell | G3, INFb, v(+) |
| 3 | M | 76 | T3b, N0, M0 | Clear cell | G2, INFa, v(+) |
| 4 | M | 65 | T3a, N0, M1 | Clear cell | G3, INFb, v(+) |
| 5 | F | 50 | T1b, Nx, M0 | Clear cell | G2, INFa, v(−) |
| 6 | M | 65 | T1a, Nx, M0 | Clear cell | G1, INFa, v(−) |
Abbreviations: INF=infiltration pattern; M/F=male/female; NA=not available; TNM=tumour node metastasis; yr=years.
According to 1997 TNM staging guidelines.
According to Fuhrman's system.
Figure 6LOX expression in hTECs from human RCC. (A) FACS analysis of hTECs showing UEA1–lectin binding, expression of the endothelial markers CD31 and CD105 and no CD45 expression (right line). Left line is the isotype control. (B) qPCR to confirm that LOX mRNA was highly expressed in all six hTECs compared with corresponding hNECs. Linear plot for LOX mRNA expression in hNECs and hTECs for six case-matched samples. Each point is the average of three independent qPCR results. *P<0.05 vs control; paired t-test (means±s.d.; n=6 per group). (C) Tumour blood vessels in human RCC were double stained with anti-CD31 and anti-LOX antibodies. LOX protein was highly expressed in the blood vessels of human RCC. Scale bar=50 μm.