Literature DB >> 24045583

Benchmarking of multivariate similarity measures for high-content screening fingerprints in phenotypic drug discovery.

Felix Reisen1, Xian Zhang, Daniela Gabriel, Paul Selzer.   

Abstract

High-content screening (HCS) is a powerful tool for drug discovery being capable of measuring cellular responses to chemical disturbance in a high-throughput manner. HCS provides an image-based readout of cellular phenotypes, including features such as shape, intensity, or texture in a highly multiplexed and quantitative manner. The corresponding feature vectors can be used to characterize phenotypes and are thus defined as HCS fingerprints. Systematic analyses of HCS fingerprints allow for objective computational comparisons of cellular responses. Such comparisons therefore facilitate the detection of different compounds with different phenotypic outcomes from high-throughput HCS campaigns. Feature selection methods and similarity measures, as a basis for phenotype identification and clustering, are critical for the quality of such computational analyses. We systematically evaluated 16 different similarity measures in combination with linear and nonlinear feature selection methods for their potential to capture biologically relevant image features. Nonlinear correlation-based similarity measures such as Kendall's τ and Spearman's ρ perform well in most evaluation scenarios, outperforming other frequently used metrics (such as the Euclidian distance). We also present four novel modifications of the connectivity map similarity that surpass the original version, in our experiments. This study provides a basis for generic phenotypic analysis in future HCS campaigns.

Keywords:  HCS fingerprints; data analysis; high-content screening; phenotypic screening; similarity metrics

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24045583     DOI: 10.1177/1087057113501390

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomol Screen        ISSN: 1087-0571


  12 in total

1.  Development of the Theta Comparative Cell Scoring Method to Quantify Diverse Phenotypic Responses Between Distinct Cell Types.

Authors:  Scott J Warchal; John C Dawson; Neil O Carragher
Journal:  Assay Drug Dev Technol       Date:  2016-09       Impact factor: 1.738

Review 2.  Flow Cytometry: Impact on Early Drug Discovery.

Authors:  Bruce S Edwards; Larry A Sklar
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2015-03-24

3.  Why is Tanimoto index an appropriate choice for fingerprint-based similarity calculations?

Authors:  Dávid Bajusz; Anita Rácz; Károly Héberger
Journal:  J Cheminform       Date:  2015-05-20       Impact factor: 5.514

Review 4.  Increasing the Content of High-Content Screening: An Overview.

Authors:  Shantanu Singh; Anne E Carpenter; Auguste Genovesio
Journal:  J Biomol Screen       Date:  2014-04-07

5.  High-resolution phenotypic profiling of natural products-induced effects on the single-cell level.

Authors:  Stephan Kremb; Christian R Voolstra
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-03-15       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  A big data approach with artificial neural network and molecular similarity for chemical data mining and endocrine disruption prediction.

Authors:  Renjith Paulose; Kalirajan Jegatheesan; Gopal Samy Balakrishnan
Journal:  Indian J Pharmacol       Date:  2018 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 1.200

Review 7.  Machine learning and image-based profiling in drug discovery.

Authors:  Christian Scheeder; Florian Heigwer; Michael Boutros
Journal:  Curr Opin Syst Biol       Date:  2018-08

8.  Unbiased Phenotype Detection Using Negative Controls.

Authors:  Antje Janosch; Carolin Kaffka; Marc Bickle
Journal:  SLAS Discov       Date:  2019-01-07       Impact factor: 3.341

9.  Robust Classification of Small-Molecule Mechanism of Action Using a Minimalist High-Content Microscopy Screen and Multidimensional Phenotypic Trajectory Analysis.

Authors:  Nathaniel R Twarog; Jonathan A Low; Duane G Currier; Greg Miller; Taosheng Chen; Anang A Shelat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-02-17       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Data-analysis strategies for image-based cell profiling.

Authors:  Juan C Caicedo; Sam Cooper; Florian Heigwer; Scott Warchal; Peng Qiu; Csaba Molnar; Aliaksei S Vasilevich; Joseph D Barry; Harmanjit Singh Bansal; Oren Kraus; Mathias Wawer; Lassi Paavolainen; Markus D Herrmann; Mohammad Rohban; Jane Hung; Holger Hennig; John Concannon; Ian Smith; Paul A Clemons; Shantanu Singh; Paul Rees; Peter Horvath; Roger G Linington; Anne E Carpenter
Journal:  Nat Methods       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 28.547

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.