Literature DB >> 24045544

Interobserver concordance in implementing the 2010 ASCO/CAP recommendations for reporting ER in breast carcinomas: a demonstration of the difficulties of consistently reporting low levels of ER expression by manual quantification.

Emily S Reisenbichler1, Susan C Lester, Andrea L Richardson, Deborah A Dillon, Amy Ly, Jane E Brock.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Endocrine therapy reduces recurrence risk by 30% to 50% in estrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer. The ER-positive threshold recommended by the American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists is 1% based on studies using the ER-6F11 antibody. ER-SP1 antibody has a higher sensitivity and is more widely used.
METHODS: We report interobserver concordance manually measuring ER in 264 breast cancers using ER-SP1 and 1D5 and 2 scoring methods (H-score and Allred score).
RESULTS: With both antibodies, 3% to 4% of cases have a low level of ER expression (1%-10%), more than previously reported (<1%). We find a high level of paired observer concordance with both antibodies and scoring methods (κ = 0.892-0.943) with no significant difference with method of scoring. Despite excellent concordance, positive/negative discordance was almost 5% among 3 observers using either antibody, an underappreciated clinically significant rate.
CONCLUSIONS: Discordance overwhelmingly reflected differing opinions recording the proportion of tumor cells positive with low levels of expression (<10% staining; 12/13 cases).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Breast carcinoma; Concordance; Estrogen receptor; Immunohistochemistry

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24045544     DOI: 10.1309/AJCP1RF9FUIZRDPI

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  15 in total

1.  Whole tumor section quantitative image analysis maximizes between-pathologists' reproducibility for clinical immunohistochemistry-based biomarkers.

Authors:  Michael Barnes; Chukka Srinivas; Isaac Bai; Judith Frederick; Wendy Liu; Anindya Sarkar; Xiuzhong Wang; Yao Nie; Bryce Portier; Monesh Kapadia; Olcay Sertel; Elizabeth Little; Bikash Sabata; Jim Ranger-Moore
Journal:  Lab Invest       Date:  2017-08-14       Impact factor: 5.662

2.  Breast cancer subtype discrimination using standardized 4-IHC and digital image analysis.

Authors:  Marina Gándara-Cortes; Ángel Vázquez-Boquete; Beatriz Fernández-Rodríguez; Patricia Viaño; Dora Ínsua; Alejandro Seoane-Seoane; Francisco Gude; Rosalía Gallego; Máximo Fraga; José R Antúnez; Teresa Curiel; Eva Pérez-López; Tomás García-Caballero
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2017-08-20       Impact factor: 4.064

3.  Comparison of immunohistochemistry and RT-qPCR for assessing ER, PR, HER2, and Ki67 and evaluating subtypes in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Lili Chen; Yanyang Chen; Zhongpeng Xie; Jiao Luo; Yuefeng Wang; Jianwen Zhou; Leilei Huang; Hongxia Li; Linhai Wang; Pei Liu; Man Shu; Wenhui Zhang; Zunfu Ke
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 4.624

4.  A systematic comparison of three commercial estrogen receptor assays in a single clinical outcome breast cancer cohort.

Authors:  Elizabeth N Kornaga; Alexander C Klimowicz; Natalia Guggisberg; Travis Ogilvie; Don G Morris; Marc Webster; Anthony M Magliocco
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 7.842

5.  Evaluation of the HER2 and Hormone Receptor Status in Metastatic Breast Cancer Using Cell Blocks: A Multi-Institutional Study.

Authors:  Rieko Nishimura; Yuya Murata; Kiyoshi Mori; Katsushige Yamashiro; Kazuya Kuraoka; Shu Ichihara; Kenichi Taguchi; Hiroyoshi Suzuki; Masahiro Ito; Natsumi Yamashita
Journal:  Acta Cytol       Date:  2018-05-15       Impact factor: 2.319

6.  Development and validation of a novel nomogram for predicting distant metastasis-free survival among breast cancer patients.

Authors:  Yan Wang; Yaping Yang; Zhengbo Chen; Teng Zhu; Jiannan Wu; Fengxi Su; Heran Deng
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-10

Review 7.  Assessment of estrogen receptor low positive status in breast cancer: Implications for pathologists and oncologists.

Authors:  Nicola Fusco; Moira Ragazzi; Elham Sajjadi; Konstantinos Venetis; Roberto Piciotti; Stefania Morganti; Giacomo Santandrea; Giuseppe Nicolò Fanelli; Luca Despini; Marco Invernizzi; Bruna Cerbelli; Cristian Scatena; Carmen Criscitiello
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2021-09-29       Impact factor: 2.303

8.  Study assessing the quality of quantification of estrogen receptor protein expression by immunohistochemistry and gene expression in breast cancer.

Authors:  Sas Leen; Van Laere Steven; Dierick Anne Marie; Duwel Valérie; De Pauw Annemie; Van Den Eynden Gert; Van Dam Peter; Dirix Luc; Vermeulen Peter; Lardon Filip
Journal:  Patholog Res Int       Date:  2014-03-06

9.  Technical validation of an RT-qPCR in vitro diagnostic test system for the determination of breast cancer molecular subtypes by quantification of ERBB2, ESR1, PGR and MKI67 mRNA levels from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded breast tumor specimens.

Authors:  Mark Laible; Kornelia Schlombs; Katharina Kaiser; Elke Veltrup; Stefanie Herlein; Sotiris Lakis; Robert Stöhr; Sebastian Eidt; Arndt Hartmann; Ralph M Wirtz; Ugur Sahin
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2016-07-07       Impact factor: 4.430

10.  Relation between primary tumor FDG avidity and site of first distant metastasis in patients with breast cancer.

Authors:  Chae Hong Lim; Seung Hwan Moon; Young Seok Cho; Young-Hyuck Im; Yearn Seong Choe; Byung-Tae Kim; Kyung-Han Lee
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-08       Impact factor: 1.889

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.