OBJECTIVE: Support vector machines (SVM) have developed into a gold standard for accurate classification in brain-computer interfaces (BCI). The choice of the most appropriate classifier for a particular application depends on several characteristics in addition to decoding accuracy. Here we investigate the implementation of hidden Markov models (HMM) for online BCIs and discuss strategies to improve their performance. APPROACH: We compare the SVM, serving as a reference, and HMMs for classifying discrete finger movements obtained from electrocorticograms of four subjects performing a finger tapping experiment. The classifier decisions are based on a subset of low-frequency time domain and high gamma oscillation features. MAIN RESULTS: We show that decoding optimization between the two approaches is due to the way features are extracted and selected and less dependent on the classifier. An additional gain in HMM performance of up to 6% was obtained by introducing model constraints. Comparable accuracies of up to 90% were achieved with both SVM and HMM with the high gamma cortical response providing the most important decoding information for both techniques. SIGNIFICANCE: We discuss technical HMM characteristics and adaptations in the context of the presented data as well as for general BCI applications. Our findings suggest that HMMs and their characteristics are promising for efficient online BCIs.
OBJECTIVE: Support vector machines (SVM) have developed into a gold standard for accurate classification in brain-computer interfaces (BCI). The choice of the most appropriate classifier for a particular application depends on several characteristics in addition to decoding accuracy. Here we investigate the implementation of hidden Markov models (HMM) for online BCIs and discuss strategies to improve their performance. APPROACH: We compare the SVM, serving as a reference, and HMMs for classifying discrete finger movements obtained from electrocorticograms of four subjects performing a finger tapping experiment. The classifier decisions are based on a subset of low-frequency time domain and high gamma oscillation features. MAIN RESULTS: We show that decoding optimization between the two approaches is due to the way features are extracted and selected and less dependent on the classifier. An additional gain in HMM performance of up to 6% was obtained by introducing model constraints. Comparable accuracies of up to 90% were achieved with both SVM and HMM with the high gamma cortical response providing the most important decoding information for both techniques. SIGNIFICANCE: We discuss technical HMM characteristics and adaptations in the context of the presented data as well as for general BCI applications. Our findings suggest that HMMs and their characteristics are promising for efficient online BCIs.
Authors: Soumyadipta Acharya; Matthew S Fifer; Heather L Benz; Nathan E Crone; Nitish V Thakor Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2010-05-20 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Tim Pfeiffer; Nicolai Heinze; Robert Frysch; Leon Y Deouell; Mircea A Schoenfeld; Robert T Knight; Georg Rose Journal: J Neural Eng Date: 2016-02-09 Impact factor: 5.379
Authors: Renjie Li; Rebecca J St George; Xinyi Wang; Katherine Lawler; Edward Hill; Saurabh Garg; Stefan Williams; Samuel Relton; David Hogg; Quan Bai; Jane Alty Journal: Comput Biol Med Date: 2022-06-21 Impact factor: 6.698
Authors: P Justin Rossi; Aysegul Gunduz; Jack Judy; Linda Wilson; Andre Machado; James J Giordano; W Jeff Elias; Marvin A Rossi; Christopher L Butson; Michael D Fox; Cameron C McIntyre; Nader Pouratian; Nicole C Swann; Coralie de Hemptinne; Robert E Gross; Howard J Chizeck; Michele Tagliati; Andres M Lozano; Wayne Goodman; Jean-Philippe Langevin; Ron L Alterman; Umer Akbar; Greg A Gerhardt; Warren M Grill; Mark Hallett; Todd Herrington; Jeffrey Herron; Craig van Horne; Brian H Kopell; Anthony E Lang; Codrin Lungu; Daniel Martinez-Ramirez; Alon Y Mogilner; Rene Molina; Enrico Opri; Kevin J Otto; Karim G Oweiss; Yagna Pathak; Aparna Shukla; Jonathan Shute; Sameer A Sheth; Ludy C Shih; G Karl Steinke; Alexander I Tröster; Nora Vanegas; Kareem A Zaghloul; Leopoldo Cendejas-Zaragoza; Leonard Verhagen; Kelly D Foote; Michael S Okun Journal: Front Neurosci Date: 2016-04-06 Impact factor: 4.677