Literature DB >> 24045342

Larger mammals have longer faces because of size-related constraints on skull form.

Andrea Cardini1, P David Polly.   

Abstract

Facial length is one of the best known examples of heterochrony. Changes in the timing of facial growth have been invoked as a mechanism for the origin of our short human face from our long-faced extinct relatives. Such heterochronic changes arguably permit great evolutionary flexibility, allowing the mammalian face to be remodelled simply by modifying postnatal growth. Here we present new data that show that this mechanism is significantly constrained by adult size. Small mammals are more brachycephalic (short faced) than large ones, despite the putative independence between adult size and facial length. This pattern holds across four phenotypic lineages: antelopes, fruit bats, tree squirrels and mongooses. Despite the apparent flexibility of facial heterochrony, growth of the face is linked to absolute size and introduces what seems to be a loose but clade-wide mammalian constraint on head shape.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24045342     DOI: 10.1038/ncomms3458

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nat Commun        ISSN: 2041-1723            Impact factor:   14.919


  38 in total

1.  Craniodental and Postcranial Characters of Non-Avian Dinosauria Often Imply Different Trees.

Authors:  Yimeng Li; Marcello Ruta; Matthew A Wills
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 15.683

Review 2.  Integration and the Developmental Genetics of Allometry.

Authors:  Benedikt Hallgrímsson; David C Katz; Jose D Aponte; Jacinda R Larson; Jay Devine; Paula N Gonzalez; Nathan M Young; Charles C Roseman; Ralph S Marcucio
Journal:  Integr Comp Biol       Date:  2019-11-01       Impact factor: 3.326

3.  The biomechanics of foraging determines face length among kangaroos and their relatives.

Authors:  D Rex Mitchell; Emma Sherratt; Justin A Ledogar; Stephen Wroe
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2018-06-27       Impact factor: 5.349

4.  The shapes of bird beaks are highly controlled by nondietary factors.

Authors:  Jen A Bright; Jesús Marugán-Lobón; Samuel N Cobb; Emily J Rayfield
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-04-28       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Evolution of skull shape in the family Salamandridae (Amphibia: Caudata).

Authors:  Ana Ivanović; Jan W Arntzen
Journal:  J Anat       Date:  2017-12-14       Impact factor: 2.610

6.  Testing the cranial evolutionary allometric 'rule' in Galliformes.

Authors:  M Linde-Medina
Journal:  J Evol Biol       Date:  2016-07-08       Impact factor: 2.411

7.  The contractile patterns, anatomy and physiology of the hyoid musculature change longitudinally through infancy.

Authors:  C J Mayerl; K E Steer; A M Chava; L E Bond; C E Edmonds; F D H Gould; B M Stricklen; T L Hieronymous; R Z German
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-10       Impact factor: 5.349

8.  Detecting Phylogenetic Signal and Adaptation in Papionin Cranial Shape by Decomposing Variation at Different Spatial Scales.

Authors:  Nicole D S Grunstra; Silvester J Bartsch; Anne Le Maître; Philipp Mitteroecker
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 15.683

Review 9.  Cetacean Skull Telescoping Brings Evolution of Cranial Sutures into Focus.

Authors:  Rachel A Roston; V Louise Roth
Journal:  Anat Rec (Hoboken)       Date:  2019-03-08       Impact factor: 2.227

10.  A New Large Hyainailourine from the Bartonian of Europe and Its Bearings on the Evolution and Ecology of Massive Hyaenodonts (Mammalia).

Authors:  Floréal Solé; Eli Amson; Matthew Borths; Dominique Vidalenc; Michael Morlo; Katharina Bastl
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.