Literature DB >> 24045141

Safety of outpatient laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the elderly: analysis of 15,248 patients using the NSQIP database.

Ajit Rao1, Antonio Polanco, Sujing Qiu, Joseph Kim, Edward H Chin, Celia M Divino, Scott Q Nguyen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies have shown that laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) in an ambulatory setting is a safe alternative to the traditional overnight hospital stay. However, there are limited data on the morbidity and mortality of outpatient LC in elderly patients. We evaluated the safety of ambulatory LC in the elderly and identified risk factors that predict inpatient admission. STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective analysis was performed using the American College of Surgeon's NSQIP database between 2007 and 2010. The database was searched for patients older than 65 years of age who underwent elective LC at all participating hospitals in the United States. Data from 15,248 patients were collected and we compared patients who underwent ambulatory procedures with those patients who were admitted for an inpatient stay.
RESULTS: Seven thousand four hundred and ninety-nine (48.9%) patients were ambulatory and 7,799 (51.1%) were nonambulatory. Postoperative complications included mortality (0.2% vs 1.5%; p < 0.001), stroke (0.1% vs 0.3%; p < 0.001), myocardial infarction (0.1% vs 0.6%; p < 0.001), pulmonary embolism (0.1% vs 0.3%; p = 0.005), and sepsis (0.2% vs 0.7%; p < 0.001) for ambulatory and nonambulatory cases, respectively. We identified significant independent predictors of inpatient admission and mortality, including congestive heart failure, American Society of Anesthesiologists class 4, bleeding disorder, and renal failure requiring dialysis.
CONCLUSIONS: We believe ambulatory LCs are safe in elderly patients as demonstrated by low complication rates. We identified multiple risk factors that might warrant inpatient hospital admission.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24045141     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.08.001

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  14 in total

1.  Definitional Differences of 'Outpatient' Versus 'Inpatient' THA and TKA Can Affect Study Outcomes.

Authors:  Patawut Bovonratwet; Matthew L Webb; Nathaniel T Ondeck; Adam M Lukasiewicz; Jonathan J Cui; Ryan P McLynn; Jonathan N Grauer
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 4.176

2.  Robotic versus laparoscopic cholecystectomy inpatient analysis: does the end justify the means?

Authors:  Jan P Kamiński; Kenneth W Bueltmann; Marek Rudnicki
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2014-10-16       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Preoperative Clinical Factors Associated with Short-Stay Laparoscopic Appendectomy.

Authors:  Aurélie Vuagniaux; Olivier Gié; Fabio Butti; Pedro Manuel Marques-Vidal; Nicolas Demartines; Styliani Mantziari
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 3.352

4.  High early cardiovascular mortality after liver transplantation.

Authors:  Lisa B VanWagner; Brittany Lapin; Josh Levitsky; John T Wilkins; Michael M Abecassis; Anton I Skaro; Donald M Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  Liver Transpl       Date:  2014-10-24       Impact factor: 5.799

5.  How Safe is Performing Cholecystectomy in the Oldest Old? A 15-year Retrospective Study from a Single Institution.

Authors:  Matteo Novello; Davide Gori; Salomone Di Saverio; Matteo Bianchin; Lorenzo Maestri; Francesco Vito Mandarino; Giuseppe Cavallari; Bruno Nardo
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2018-01       Impact factor: 3.352

6.  Morphologic factors of biliary trees are associated with gallstone-related biliary events.

Authors:  Jin-Seok Park; Don Haeng Lee; Jun Hyeok Lim; Seok Jeong; Young Sun Jeon
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-01-07       Impact factor: 5.742

7.  Factors Associated With Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events After Liver Transplantation Among a National Sample.

Authors:  L B VanWagner; M Serper; R Kang; J Levitsky; S Hohmann; M Abecassis; A Skaro; D M Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2016-03-29       Impact factor: 8.086

8.  Ambulatory laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A single center experience.

Authors:  Cagri Tiryaki; Zülfü Bayhan; Ertugrul Kargi; Ahmet Alponat
Journal:  J Minim Access Surg       Date:  2016 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 1.407

9.  Geriatric Assessment as a qualification element for elective and emergency cholecystectomy in older patients.

Authors:  Jakub Kenig; Piotr Wałęga; Urszula Olszewska; Aleksander Konturek; Wojciech Nowak
Journal:  World J Emerg Surg       Date:  2016-07-29       Impact factor: 5.469

10.  Feasibility of Routine Ambulatory Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy in Brazil.

Authors:  Júlio Cezar Uili Coelho; Giuliano Ohde Dalledone; Eduardo Lopes Martins Filho; Eduardo José Brommelstroet Ramos; Marco Aurélio Roeder da Costa; Omar O H M de Loyola E Silva
Journal:  JSLS       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun       Impact factor: 2.172

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.