Literature DB >> 2404430

Patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor: a comparison of three solutions with a continuous infusion control.

S Z Lysak1, J C Eisenach, C E Dobson.   

Abstract

This study examined the efficacy of patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) during labor and compared the suitability of three different PCEA solutions. After establishing effective epidural analgesia with 12 ml of 0.25% bupivacaine, 72 parturients in active labor were randomly assigned to one of four groups: physician-controlled continuous epidural infusion using 0.125% bupivacaine (CEI); PCEA using 0.125% bupivacaine (B); PCEA using 0.125% bupivacaine with fentanyl 1 micrograms/ml (BF); and PCEA using 0.125% bupivacaine with fentanyl 1 micrograms/ml and 1:400,000 epinephrine (BFE). The CEI infusion was begun at 12-16 ml/h and adjusted to maintain a T10 sensory level and adequate pain relief. PCEA pumps were programmed to deliver a 6 ml/h basal infusion, 4 ml on-demand boluses, 10-min lockout intervals between doses, and a 20 ml hourly limit. Hemodynamic parameters, sensory level, quality of analgesia, duration of labor, overall satisfaction, and Apgar scores did not differ among groups. Compared with CEI, PCEA with plain bupivacaine did not decrease total local anesthetic usage or average hourly infusion rates during labor. However, addition of fentanyl (groups BF and BFE) decreased hourly infusion requirements. Average hourly infusion rates were 13.0 +/- 1.1 ml/h (B), 10.6 +/- 0.6 ml/h (BF), and 9.6 +/- 0.5 ml/h (BFE); group B differs from others (P less than 0.05). No instance of respiratory depression or complication secondary to PCEA was observed. Mild pruritus occurred only with fentanyl-containing solutions, whereas dense motor block developed more frequently with the epinephrine-containing solution.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2404430     DOI: 10.1097/00000542-199001000-00009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anesthesiology        ISSN: 0003-3022            Impact factor:   7.892


  9 in total

Review 1.  Do the pharmacodynamics of the nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs suggest a role in the management of postoperative pain?

Authors:  L E Mather
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1992       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 2.  Recent developments in analgesia during labour.

Authors:  R E Kan; S C Hughes
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1995-09       Impact factor: 9.546

3.  Bupivacaine versus bupivacaine plus fentanyl for epidural analgesia: effect on maternal satisfaction.

Authors:  J D Murphy; K Henderson; M I Bowden; M Lewis; G M Cooper
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  1991-03-09

Review 4.  Treatment options for the relief of pain during childbirth.

Authors:  P Brownridge
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1991-01       Impact factor: 9.546

5.  Patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor using ropivacaine and fentanyl provides better maternal satisfaction with less local anesthetic requirement.

Authors:  Miwako Saito; Toshiyuki Okutomi; Yuji Kanai; Junko Mochizuki; Akihiro Tani; Kan Amano; Sumio Hoka
Journal:  J Anesth       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 2.078

6.  Patient-controlled epidural analgesia in labour: varying bolus dose and lockout interval.

Authors:  D R Gambling; C J Huber; J Berkowitz; P Howell; J E Swenerton; P L Ross; C T Crochetière; T J Pavy
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  1993-03       Impact factor: 5.063

7.  Neostigmine decreases bupivacaine use by patient-controlled epidural analgesia during labor: a randomized controlled study.

Authors:  Vernon H Ross; Peter H Pan; Medge D Owen; Melvin H Seid; Lynne Harris; Brittany Clyne; Misa Voltaire; James C Eisenach
Journal:  Anesth Analg       Date:  2009-04-17       Impact factor: 5.108

8.  [Perioperative analgesia in adults : The concept of balanced analgesia.].

Authors:  J Jage
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  1993-09       Impact factor: 1.107

9.  Epidural analgesia with amide local anesthetics, bupivacaine, and ropivacaine in combination with fentanyl for labor pain relief: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yiyang Li; Cong Hu; Yanyan Fan; Huixia Wang; Hongmei Xu
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2015-03-29
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.