Literature DB >> 24043870

How warm was the last interglacial? New model-data comparisons.

Bette L Otto-Bliesner1, Nan Rosenbloom, Emma J Stone, Nicholas P McKay, Daniel J Lunt, Esther C Brady, Jonathan T Overpeck.   

Abstract

A Community Climate System Model, Version 3 (CCSM3) simulation for 125 ka during the Last Interglacial (LIG) is compared to two recent proxy reconstructions to evaluate surface temperature changes from modern times. The dominant forcing change from modern, the orbital forcing, modified the incoming solar insolation at the top of the atmosphere, resulting in large positive anomalies in boreal summer. Greenhouse gas concentrations are similar to those of the pre-industrial (PI) Holocene. CCSM3 simulates an enhanced seasonal cycle over the Northern Hemisphere continents with warming most developed during boreal summer. In addition, year-round warming over the North Atlantic is associated with a seasonal memory of sea ice retreat in CCSM3, which extends the effects of positive summer insolation anomalies on the high-latitude oceans to winter months. The simulated Arctic terrestrial annual warming, though, is much less than the observational evidence, suggesting either missing feedbacks in the simulation and/or interpretation of the proxies. Over Antarctica, CCSM3 cannot reproduce the large LIG warming recorded by the Antarctic ice cores, even with simulations designed to consider observed evidence of early LIG warmth in Southern Ocean and Antarctica records and the possible disintegration of the West Antarctic Ice Sheet. Comparisons with a HadCM3 simulation indicate that sea ice is important for understanding model polar responses. Overall, the models simulate little global annual surface temperature change, while the proxy reconstructions suggest a global annual warming at LIG (as compared to the PI Holocene) of approximately 1(°)C, though with possible spatial sampling biases. The CCSM3 SRES B1 (low scenario) future projections suggest high-latitude warmth similar to that reconstructed for the LIG may be exceeded before the end of this century.

Entities:  

Keywords:  climate change; climate modelling; last interglacial; polar warmth

Year:  2013        PMID: 24043870     DOI: 10.1098/rsta.2013.0097

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci        ISSN: 1364-503X            Impact factor:   4.226


  10 in total

1.  Ancient plant DNA reveals High Arctic greening during the Last Interglacial.

Authors:  Sarah E Crump; Bianca Fréchette; Matthew Power; Sam Cutler; Gregory de Wet; Martha K Raynolds; Jonathan H Raberg; Jason P Briner; Elizabeth K Thomas; Julio Sepúlveda; Beth Shapiro; Michael Bunce; Gifford H Miller
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2021-03-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Evolution of global temperature over the past two million years.

Authors:  Carolyn W Snyder
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 49.962

3.  Greenland records of aerosol source and atmospheric lifetime changes from the Eemian to the Holocene.

Authors:  S Schüpbach; H Fischer; M Bigler; T Erhardt; G Gfeller; D Leuenberger; O Mini; R Mulvaney; N J Abram; L Fleet; M M Frey; E Thomas; A Svensson; D Dahl-Jensen; E Kettner; H Kjaer; I Seierstad; J P Steffensen; S O Rasmussen; P Vallelonga; M Winstrup; A Wegner; B Twarloh; K Wolff; K Schmidt; K Goto-Azuma; T Kuramoto; M Hirabayashi; J Uetake; J Zheng; J Bourgeois; D Fisher; D Zhiheng; C Xiao; M Legrand; A Spolaor; J Gabrieli; C Barbante; J-H Kang; S D Hur; S B Hong; H J Hwang; S Hong; M Hansson; Y Iizuka; I Oyabu; R Muscheler; F Adolphi; O Maselli; J McConnell; E W Wolff
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-04-16       Impact factor: 14.919

4.  Past continental shelf evolution increased Antarctic ice sheet sensitivity to climatic conditions.

Authors:  Florence Colleoni; Laura De Santis; Enea Montoli; Elisabetta Olivo; Christopher C Sorlien; Philip J Bart; Edward G W Gasson; Andrea Bergamasco; Chiara Sauli; Nigel Wardell; Stefano Prato
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-07-27       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Warm climates of the past--a lesson for the future?

Authors:  D J Lunt; H Elderfield; R Pancost; A Ridgwell; G L Foster; A Haywood; J Kiehl; N Sagoo; C Shields; E J Stone; P Valdes
Journal:  Philos Trans A Math Phys Eng Sci       Date:  2013-09-16       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Antarctic last interglacial isotope peak in response to sea ice retreat not ice-sheet collapse.

Authors:  Max D Holloway; Louise C Sime; Joy S Singarayer; Julia C Tindall; Pete Bunch; Paul J Valdes
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2016-08-16       Impact factor: 14.919

7.  Nonlinear climate sensitivity and its implications for future greenhouse warming.

Authors:  Tobias Friedrich; Axel Timmermann; Michelle Tigchelaar; Oliver Elison Timm; Andrey Ganopolski
Journal:  Sci Adv       Date:  2016-11-09       Impact factor: 14.136

8.  Arctic Ocean sea ice cover during the penultimate glacial and the last interglacial.

Authors:  Ruediger Stein; Kirsten Fahl; Paul Gierz; Frank Niessen; Gerrit Lohmann
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2017-08-29       Impact factor: 14.919

9.  Genetic Patterns of Myrceugenia correifolia, a Rare Species of Fog-Dependent Forests of Mediterranean Chile: Is It a Climatic Relict?

Authors:  Fernanda Pérez; Luis F Hinojosa; Gioconda Peralta; Paz Montenegro; Carla Irarrázabal; Michel Cossio
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 5.753

10.  Early Last Interglacial ocean warming drove substantial ice mass loss from Antarctica.

Authors:  Chris S M Turney; Christopher J Fogwill; Nicholas R Golledge; Nicholas P McKay; Erik van Sebille; Richard T Jones; David Etheridge; Mauro Rubino; David P Thornton; Siwan M Davies; Christopher Bronk Ramsey; Zoë A Thomas; Michael I Bird; Niels C Munksgaard; Mika Kohno; John Woodward; Kate Winter; Laura S Weyrich; Camilla M Rootes; Helen Millman; Paul G Albert; Andres Rivera; Tas van Ommen; Mark Curran; Andrew Moy; Stefan Rahmstorf; Kenji Kawamura; Claus-Dieter Hillenbrand; Michael E Weber; Christina J Manning; Jennifer Young; Alan Cooper
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2020-02-11       Impact factor: 11.205

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.