BACKGROUND: Total gastrectomy is performed for early gastric cancer in the upper body of the stomach because of the high complication rate of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The aims of the present animal study in pigs were to verify: (1) the feasibility of the trans-umbilical route compared with the trans-oral route in gastric upper body ESD; (2) the non-inferiority of single port laparoscopic lymph node dissection (LLND) compared with multiport LLND; and (3) the safety of 2-basin LLND (upper greater and lesser curvature). METHODS: We separated the pigs (~40 kg each) into two groups: conventional and experimental (n = 5 per group). We performed ESD in the fundus and upper body anterior wall (UBAW) via the trans-oral route and multiport LLND in the conventional group, and via the trans-umbilical route and single port LLND in the experimental group. RESULTS: The completion rates, tissue weights, and specimen diameters of both routes showed no statistical differences in either the fundus or the UBAW. The operative time was shorter with the trans-umbilical route than with the trans-oral route in both areas (p < 0.05). In LLND, there were no differences in surgical outcomes between the multiport and single port groups. Intraoperative perforation was seen in the trans-oral route group (n = 1). Delayed perforation was observed in 30 % of the ESD sites. CONCLUSIONS: The trans-umbilical route is feasible and has lower complication rates than the trans-oral route in gastric upper body ESD. Additionally, single port LLND is not inferior to multiport LLND, and one-side-basin dissection is safer than two-side.
BACKGROUND: Total gastrectomy is performed for early gastric cancer in the upper body of the stomach because of the high complication rate of endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). The aims of the present animal study in pigs were to verify: (1) the feasibility of the trans-umbilical route compared with the trans-oral route in gastric upper body ESD; (2) the non-inferiority of single port laparoscopic lymph node dissection (LLND) compared with multiport LLND; and (3) the safety of 2-basin LLND (upper greater and lesser curvature). METHODS: We separated the pigs (~40 kg each) into two groups: conventional and experimental (n = 5 per group). We performed ESD in the fundus and upper body anterior wall (UBAW) via the trans-oral route and multiport LLND in the conventional group, and via the trans-umbilical route and single port LLND in the experimental group. RESULTS: The completion rates, tissue weights, and specimen diameters of both routes showed no statistical differences in either the fundus or the UBAW. The operative time was shorter with the trans-umbilical route than with the trans-oral route in both areas (p < 0.05). In LLND, there were no differences in surgical outcomes between the multiport and single port groups. Intraoperative perforation was seen in the trans-oral route group (n = 1). Delayed perforation was observed in 30 % of the ESD sites. CONCLUSIONS: The trans-umbilical route is feasible and has lower complication rates than the trans-oral route in gastric upper body ESD. Additionally, single port LLND is not inferior to multiport LLND, and one-side-basin dissection is safer than two-side.
Authors: Hyuk Jung Kim; Kyoung Ho Lee; Young Hoon Kim; Hyung Ho Kim; Se Hyung Kim; Hyuk Joon Lee; Jin Young Choi Journal: Abdom Imaging Date: 2006-08-24