Literature DB >> 24042244

Grief, depression, and the DSM-5.

Sidney Zisook1, Ronald Pies, Alana Iglewicz.   

Abstract

Based on a review of the best available evidence and the importance of providing clinicians an opportunity to ensure that patients and their families receive the appropriate diagnosis and the correct intervention without necessarily being constrained by a somewhat arbitrary 2-month period of time, the DSM-5 Task Force recommended eliminating the "bereavement exclusion" (BE) from the diagnosis of major depressive disorder. This article reviews the initial rationale for creating a BE in DSM-III, reasons for not carrying the BE into DSM-5, and sources of continued controversy. The authors argue that removing the BE does not "medicalize" or "pathologize" grief, "stigmatize" bereaved persons, imply that grief morphs into depression after 2 weeks, place any time limit on grieving, or imply that antidepressant medications should be prescribed. Rather, eliminating the BE opens the door to the same careful attention that any person suffering from major depressive disorder deserves and allows the clinician to provide appropriate education, support, hope, care, and treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24042244     DOI: 10.1097/01.pra.0000435037.91049.2f

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Psychiatr Pract        ISSN: 1527-4160            Impact factor:   1.325


  2 in total

1.  The Bereavement Exclusion and DSM-5: An Update and Commentary.

Authors:  Ronald W Pies
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2014-07

2.  Development of the Bereavement Risk Inventory and Screening Questionnaire (BRISQ): Item generation and expert panel feedback.

Authors:  Kailey Roberts; Jimmie Holland; Holly G Prigerson; Corinne Sweeney; Geoffrey Corner; William Breitbart; Wendy G Lichtenthal
Journal:  Palliat Support Care       Date:  2016-08-12
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.