Literature DB >> 24041562

Identification of quality of care deficiencies in elderly surgical patients by measuring adherence to process-based quality indicators.

Simon Bergman1, Vanessa Martelli, Michèle Monette, Nadia Sourial, Melina Deban, Fadi Hamadani, Debby Teasdale, Christina Holcroft, Helena Zakrzewski, Shannon Fraser.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The ability to measure surgical quality of care is important and can lead to improvements in patient safety. As such, processes should be carried out in an identical fashion for all patients, regardless of how vulnerable or complex they are. Our objectives were to assess quality of surgical care delivered to elderly patients and to determine the association between patient characteristics and quality of care. STUDY
DESIGN: This is a retrospective pilot cohort study, conducted in a single university-affiliated hospital. Using the institution's National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) database (2009 to 2010), 143 consecutive patients 65 years or older, undergoing elective major abdominal surgery, were selected. Adherence to 15 process-based quality indicators (QIs) was measured, and a pass rate was calculated for each individual QI. The association between patient characteristics (age, sex, Charlson Comorbidity Index, functional status, wound class) and patient quality score was assessed using multiple linear regression.
RESULTS: Quality indicators with the lowest pass rates included postoperative delirium screening (0%), level of care documentation (0.7%), cognition and functional assessment at discharge (4.9%), oral intake documentation (12.6%), and pressure ulcer risk assessment (35.0%). The mean patient quality score was 46.8% ± 10.7% (range 16.7% to 75.0%). No association was found between patient characteristics and patient quality score.
CONCLUSIONS: Quality of care delivered to elderly patients undergoing major surgery at our institution was generally poor and independent of patient characteristics. Although quality appears to be uniform across different patients, these results provide targets for quality improvement initiatives.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Surgeons. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  ACOVE; Assessing Care of Vulnerable Elders; CCI; Charlson Comorbidity Index; IRR; NSQIP; National Surgical Quality Improvement Program; QI; Quality indicator; VTE; incidence rate ratio; venous thromboembolism

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24041562     DOI: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2013.07.387

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Coll Surg        ISSN: 1072-7515            Impact factor:   6.113


  9 in total

1.  Quality of Care Delivered Before vs After a Quality-Improvement Intervention for Acute Geriatric Trauma.

Authors:  Lillian Min; Henry Cryer; Chiao-Li Chan; Carol Roth; Areti Tillou
Journal:  J Am Coll Surg       Date:  2015-01-09       Impact factor: 6.113

2.  National outcomes of laparoscopic Heller myotomy: operative complications and risk factors for adverse events.

Authors:  Samuel W Ross; Bindhu Oommen; Blair A Wormer; Amanda L Walters; Brent D Matthews; B T Heniford; Vedra A Augenstein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-01-15       Impact factor: 4.584

3.  Association of the Risk of a Venous Thromboembolic Event in Emergency vs Elective General Surgery.

Authors:  Samuel W Ross; Kali M Kuhlenschmidt; John C Kubasiak; Lindsey E Mossler; Luis R Taveras; Thomas H Shoultz; Herbert A Phelan; Caroline E Reinke; Michael W Cripps
Journal:  JAMA Surg       Date:  2020-06-01       Impact factor: 14.766

4.  A little slower, but just as good: postgraduate year resident versus attending outcomes in laparoscopic ventral hernia repair.

Authors:  Samuel W Ross; Bindhu Oommen; Mimi Kim; Amanda L Walters; John M Green; B Todd Heniford; Vedra A Augenstein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-06-06       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Risk factors for postoperative sepsis in laparoscopic gastric bypass.

Authors:  L J Blair; C R Huntington; T C Cox; T Prasad; A E Lincourt; K S Gersin; B T Heniford; V A Augenstein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 4.584

6.  Acuity, outcomes, and trends in the transfer of surgical patients: a national study.

Authors:  Ciara R Huntington; Tiffany C Cox; Laurel J Blair; Tanushree Prasad; Amy E Lincourt; Brent D Matthews; B Todd Heniford; Vedra A Augenstein
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2015-07-03       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Substandard urological care of elderly patients with spinal cord injury: an unrecognized epidemic?

Authors:  Subramanian Vaidyanathan; Gurpreet Singh; Bakul Soni; Peter Hughes; Kamesh Pulya
Journal:  Patient Saf Surg       Date:  2014-01-21

Review 8.  Aligning Patient Acuity With Resource Intensity After Major Surgery: A Scoping Review.

Authors:  Tyler J Loftus; Jeremy A Balch; Matthew M Ruppert; Patrick J Tighe; William R Hogan; Parisa Rashidi; Gilbert R Upchurch; Azra Bihorac
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2022-02-01       Impact factor: 13.787

9.  Physical and psychological states interfere with health-related quality of life of institutionalized elderly: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Ilky Pollansky Silva E Farias; Luiza de Almeida Souto Montenegro; Rayssa Lucena Wanderley; Jannerson Cesar Xavier de Pontes; Antonio Carlos Pereira; Leopoldina de Fátima Dantas de Almeida; Yuri Wanderley Cavalcanti
Journal:  BMC Geriatr       Date:  2020-10-06       Impact factor: 3.921

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.