Literature DB >> 24041342

Cost-effectiveness of baseline low-dose computed tomography screening for lung cancer: the Israeli experience.

Amir Shmueli1, Shifra Fraifeld, Tamar Peretz, Orit Gutfeld, Maya Gips, Jacob Sosna, Dorith Shaham.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Reduced mortality with low-dose computed tomography (LDCT) lung cancer screening was demonstrated in a large randomized controlled study of high-risk individuals. Cost-effectiveness must be assessed before routine LDCT screening is considered. We aimed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of LDCT lung cancer screening in Israel.
METHODS: A decision analytic framework was used to evaluate the decision to screen or not screen from the health system perspective. The screening arm included 842 moderate-to-heavy smokers aged 45 years or older, screened at Hadassah-Hebrew University Medical Center from 1998 to 2004. In the usual-care arm, stage distribution and stage-specific life expectancy were obtained from the Israel National Cancer Registry data for 1994 to 2006. Lifetime stage-specific costs were estimated from medical records of patients diagnosed and treated at Hadassah Medical Center in the period 2003 to 2004. The analysis considered possible biases-lead time, overdiagnosis, and self-selection. Cost per quality-adjusted-life-year (QALY) gained by screening was estimated.
RESULTS: Base-case incremental cost per QALY gained was $1464 (2011 prices). Extensive sensitivity analysis affirmed the low cost per QALY gained. The cost per QALY gained is lower than $10,000 with probability 0.937 and is lower than $20,000 with probability 0.978.
CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that baseline LDCT lung cancer screening in Israel presents a good value for the money and should be considered for inclusion in the National List of Health Services financed publicly.
Copyright © 2013, International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research (ISPOR). Published by Elsevier Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Israel; cost per QALY; low-dose computed tomography; lung cancer

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24041342     DOI: 10.1016/j.jval.2013.05.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Value Health        ISSN: 1098-3015            Impact factor:   5.725


  8 in total

Review 1.  Next steps and barriers to implementing lung cancer screening with low-dose CT.

Authors:  D R Baldwin; E L O'Dowd
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2014-10-15       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Population health's unanimity on lung cancer screening: far ahead of medical advice.

Authors:  Bruce Pyenson; Claudia I Henschke; David F Yankelevitz
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2017-09

Review 3.  Implementation of lung cancer screening: promises and hurdles.

Authors:  Helmut Prosch
Journal:  Transl Lung Cancer Res       Date:  2014-10

4.  Considering lead-time bias in evaluating the effectiveness of lung cancer screening with real-world data.

Authors:  Szu-Chun Yang; Jung-Der Wang; Shi-Yi Wang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Trade-off between benefits, harms and economic efficiency of low-dose CT lung cancer screening: a microsimulation analysis of nodule management strategies in a population-based setting.

Authors:  Marina Treskova; Ines Aumann; Heiko Golpon; Jens Vogel-Claussen; Tobias Welte; Alexander Kuhlmann
Journal:  BMC Med       Date:  2017-08-25       Impact factor: 8.775

Review 6.  Does health economics research align with the disease burden in the Middle East and North Africa region? A systematic review of economic evaluation studies on public health interventions.

Authors:  Mouaddh Abdulmalik Nagi; Mustafa Ali Ali Rezq; Sermsiri Sangroongruangsri; Montarat Thavorncharoensap; Pramitha Esha Nirmala Dewi
Journal:  Glob Health Res Policy       Date:  2022-07-25

7.  Cost-effectiveness analysis of lung cancer screening with low-dose computerised tomography of the chest in Poland.

Authors:  Małgorzata Kanarkiewicz; Tomasz J Szczęsny; Jerzy Krysiński; Adam Buciński; Janusz Kowalewski; Zbigniew Pawłowicz
Journal:  Contemp Oncol (Pozn)       Date:  2015-12-30

Review 8.  Why and how would we implement a lung cancer screening program?

Authors:  Idris Guessous; Jacques Cornuz
Journal:  Public Health Rev       Date:  2015-11-05
  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.