| Literature DB >> 24040414 |
Zhiyong Li1, Wei Chen, Yanling Su, Qi Zhang, Zhiyong Hou, Jinshe Pan, Yingze Zhang.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to evaluate the preliminary clinical and radiographic outcomes of acute displaced femoral neck fracture treated by closed reduction and internal fixation (CRIF) with free iliac bone block grafting with comparison to a routine protocol of CRIF without bone grafting.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 24040414 PMCID: PMC3769404 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075479
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1The harvested iliac bone block graft with three sides of cortex.
Figure 2A drawing of the relative position of the iliac bone block graft and the three cannulated screws in subgroup I.
The bone graft is at an angle of 30 degrees to the screws.
Figure 3A fluoroscopic anteroposterior view of the displaced femoral neck fracture fixed with three parallel cannulated screws in subgroup II.
The iliac bone block graft (arrow) is parallel to the screws.
Operative information of patients in subgroups I and II of the study group.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 43.8±10.2 | 45.3±9.6 | 0.791 | 0.431 |
|
| 0.173 | 0.677 | ||
| Male | 19 (48.7%) | 38 (44.7%) | ||
| Female | 20 (51.3%) | 47 (55.3%) | ||
|
| 0.017 | 0.897 | ||
| Left | 22 (56.4%) | 49 (57.6%) | ||
| Right | 17 (43.6%) | 36 (42.4%) | ||
|
| 2.350 | 0.503 | ||
| Falls from standing | 31 (79.5%) | 67 (78.8%) | ||
| Falls from a height | 4 (10.3%) | 11 (12.9%) | ||
| Traffic accident | 3 (7.7%) | 7 (8.2%) | ||
| Other | 1 (2.6%) | 0 (0) | ||
|
| 0.000 | 0.995 | ||
| Subcapital | 17 (43.6%) | 37 (43.5%) | ||
| Trans-neck | 22 (56.4%) | 48 (56.5%) | ||
|
| 2.791 | 0.095 | ||
| Type III | 29 (74.4%) | 50 (58.8%) | ||
| Type IV | 10 (25.6%) | 35 (41.2%) | ||
|
| 2 (1) | 3 (1) | -1.549 | 0.121 |
|
| 81±7.4 | 82± 6.8 | 0.736 | 0.463 |
|
| 18±2.1 | 19±1.7 | 2.833 | 0.005 |
|
| 194±31.5 | 203±23.6 | 1.592 | 0.117 |
|
| 0.142 | 0.706 | ||
| Garden index grade 1 | 22 | 51 | ||
| Garden index grade 2 | 17 | 34 |
Clinical outcomes of the patients in subgroups I and II of study group at the latest follow up.
|
|
| |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 17 | 20 | 37 | 38 | 37 | 75 | |
|
| ||||||
|
| 11 | 7 | 18 | 24 | 9 | 33 |
|
| 6 | 13 | 19 | 14 | 28 | 42 |
|
| 26.2±2.5 | 25.9±2.1 | 26.1±2.3 | 28.5±3.7 | 27.7± 3.6 | 28.1±3.6 |
|
| 94.7 ±6.9 | 85.1 ±11.1 | 89.5±10.7 | 90.7±8.3 | 85.5±16.0 | 88.1±11.6 |
|
| 3 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 9 | |
|
| 2 | 2 | 5 | 3 | 8 | |
|
| 1 | 1 | ||||
|
| 1 | 1 | ||||
Operative information of patients in study and control groups.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 44.8± 8.6 | 46.3±9.2 | 1.244 | 0.215 |
|
| 0.083 | 0.774 | ||
| Male | 57 (46.0%) | 46 (47.9%) | ||
| Female | 67 (54.0%) | 50 (52.1%) | ||
|
| 0.100 | 0.752 | ||
| Left | 71 (57.3%) | 57 (59.4%) | ||
| Right | 53 (42.7%) | 39 (40.6%) | ||
|
| 0.895 | 0.827 | ||
| Falls from standing | 98 (79.0%) | 75 (78.1%) | ||
| Falls from a height | 15 (12.1%) | 12 (12.5%) | ||
| Traffic accident | 10 (8.1%) | 9 (9.4%) | ||
| Other | 1 (0.8%) | 0 (0) | ||
|
| 1.129 | 0.288 | ||
| Subcapital | 54 (43.5%) | 35 (36.5%) | ||
| Trans-neck | 70 (56.5%) | 61 (63.5%) | ||
|
| 0.208 | 0.648 | ||
| Type III | 79 (63.7%) | 64 (66.7%) | ||
| Type IV | 45 (36.3%) | 32 (33.3%) | ||
|
| 2.0±0.6 | 1.9±0.6 | 1.633 | 0.104 |
|
| 82± 6.7 | 59±5.6 | 26.981 | 0.000 |
|
| 19±1.8 | 14±2.4 | 16.882 | 0.000 |
|
| 200±31.7 | 92± 14.6 | 33.422 | 0.000 |
|
| 0.297 | 0.586 | ||
| Garden index grade 1 | 73 (58.9%) | 53 (55.2%) | ||
| Garden index grade 2 | 51 (41.1%) | 43 (44.8%) |
Clinical outcomes of the patients in both groups at the latest follow-up.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 45.1±8.9 | 46.7± 10.1 | 1.111 | 0.268 |
|
| 0.034 | 0.853 | ||
|
| 51 | 30 | ||
|
| 61 | 38 | ||
|
| 27.4±3.3 | 31.2± 5.1 | 5.781 | 0.000 |
|
| 88.6±12.7 | 83.8 ±13.3 | 2.415 | 0.017 |
|
| 10 (8.9%) | 18 (26.5%) | 9.912 | 0.002 |
|
| 0 | 11 (16.2%) | 19.297 | 0.000 |