Literature DB >> 24039551

Modeling Structural Flexibility of Proteins with Go-Models.

Ping Jiang1, Ulrich H E Hansmann.   

Abstract

Structure-based models are an efficient tool for folding studies of proteins since by construction their energy landscape is only minimal frustrated. However, their intrinsic drawback is a lack of structural flexibility as usually only one target structure is employed to construct the potentials. Hence, a Go-model may not capture differences in mutation-induced protein dynamics, if - as in the case of the disease-related A629P mutant of the Menkes protein ATP7A - the structural differences between mutant and wild type are small. In this work, we introduced three implementations of Go-models that take into account the flexibility of proteins in the NMR ensemble. Comparing the wild type and the mutant A629P of the 75-residue large 6th domain Menkes protein, we find that these new Go-potentials lead to broader distributions than Go-models relying on a single member of the NMR-ensemble. This allows us to detect the transient unfolding of a loosely formed β1β4-sheet in the mutant protein. Our results are consistent with previous simulations using physical force field and an explicit solvent, and suggests a mechanism by which these mutations cause Menkes disease. In addition, the improved Go-models suggest differences in the folding pathway between wild type and mutant, an observation that was not accessible to simulations of this 75-residue protein with a physical all-atom force field and explicit solvent.

Entities:  

Year:  2012        PMID: 24039551      PMCID: PMC3771579          DOI: 10.1021/ct3000469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput        ISSN: 1549-9618            Impact factor:   6.006


  20 in total

Review 1.  Coarse-grained models for proteins.

Authors:  Valentina Tozzini
Journal:  Curr Opin Struct Biol       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 6.809

Review 2.  Understanding protein folding: small proteins in silico.

Authors:  Olav Zimmermann; Ulrich H E Hansmann
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta       Date:  2007-11-06

3.  Robustness and generalization of structure-based models for protein folding and function.

Authors:  Heiko Lammert; Alexander Schug; José N Onuchic
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-12

4.  Protein folding roller coaster, one molecule at a time.

Authors:  Eugene Shakhnovich
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2009-07-15       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Cooperativity in protein-folding kinetics.

Authors:  K A Dill; K M Fiebig; H S Chan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1993-03-01       Impact factor: 11.205

6.  Dictionary of protein secondary structure: pattern recognition of hydrogen-bonded and geometrical features.

Authors:  W Kabsch; C Sander
Journal:  Biopolymers       Date:  1983-12       Impact factor: 2.505

7.  Challenges in protein folding simulations: Timescale, representation, and analysis.

Authors:  Peter L Freddolino; Christopher B Harrison; Yanxin Liu; Klaus Schulten
Journal:  Nat Phys       Date:  2010-10-01       Impact factor: 20.034

Review 8.  Folding proteins in fatal ways.

Authors:  Dennis J Selkoe
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2003-12-18       Impact factor: 49.962

9.  SMOG@ctbp: simplified deployment of structure-based models in GROMACS.

Authors:  Jeffrey K Noel; Paul C Whitford; Karissa Y Sanbonmatsu; José N Onuchic
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2010-06-04       Impact factor: 16.971

10.  An all-atom structure-based potential for proteins: bridging minimal models with all-atom empirical forcefields.

Authors:  Paul C Whitford; Jeffrey K Noel; Shachi Gosavi; Alexander Schug; Kevin Y Sanbonmatsu; José N Onuchic
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2009-05-01
View more
  5 in total

1.  Multicanonical Molecular Dynamics Simulations of the N-terminal Domain of Protein L9.

Authors:  Fatih Yaşar; Ping Jiang; Ulrich H E Hansmann
Journal:  Europhys Lett       Date:  2014-02-01       Impact factor: 1.947

2.  Conversion between parallel and antiparallel β-sheets in wild-type and Iowa mutant Aβ40 fibrils.

Authors:  Wenhui Xi; Ulrich H E Hansmann
Journal:  J Chem Phys       Date:  2018-01-28       Impact factor: 3.488

3.  A Method for Assessing the Robustness of Protein Structures by Randomizing Packing Interactions.

Authors:  Shilpa Yadahalli; Lakshmi P Jayanthi; Shachi Gosavi
Journal:  Front Mol Biosci       Date:  2022-06-27

4.  Sampling of Protein Folding Transitions: Multicanonical Versus Replica Exchange Molecular Dynamics.

Authors:  Ping Jiang; Fatih Yaşar; Ulrich H E Hansmann
Journal:  J Chem Theory Comput       Date:  2013-08-13       Impact factor: 6.006

5.  Theoretical Insights into the Biophysics of Protein Bi-stability and Evolutionary Switches.

Authors:  Tobias Sikosek; Heinrich Krobath; Hue Sun Chan
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-06-02       Impact factor: 4.475

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.