Literature DB >> 24039378

Evaluating Similarity Measures for Brain Image Registration.

Q R Razlighi1, N Kehtarnavaz, S Yousefi.   

Abstract

Evaluation of similarity measures for image registration is a challenging problem due to its complex interaction with the underlying optimization, regularization, image type and modality. We propose a single performance metric, named robustness, as part of a new evaluation method which quantifies the effectiveness of similarity measures for brain image registration while eliminating the effects of the other parts of the registration process. We show empirically that similarity measures with higher robustness are more effective in registering degraded images and are also more successful in performing intermodal image registration. Further, we introduce a new similarity measure, called normalized spatial mutual information, for 3D brain image registration whose robustness is shown to be much higher than the existing ones. Consequently, it tolerates greater image degradation and provides more consistent outcomes for intermodal brain image registration.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Brain Image Registration; Comparison of Similarity Measures; Normalized Spatial Mutual Information; Similarity Measures; Spatial Mutual Information

Year:  2013        PMID: 24039378      PMCID: PMC3771653          DOI: 10.1016/j.jvcir.2013.06.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Vis Commun Image Represent        ISSN: 1047-3203            Impact factor:   2.678


  25 in total

1.  Nonrigid registration using free-form deformations: application to breast MR images.

Authors:  D Rueckert; L I Sonoda; C Hayes; D L Hill; M O Leach; D J Hawkes
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 10.048

2.  A protocol for evaluation of similarity measures for rigid registration.

Authors:  Darko Skerl; Bostjan Likar; Franjo Pernus
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 3.  Brain functional localization: a survey of image registration techniques.

Authors:  Ali Gholipour; Nasser Kehtarnavaz; Richard Briggs; Michael Devous; Kaundinya Gopinath
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 10.048

Review 4.  A review of geometric transformations for nonrigid body registration.

Authors:  M Holden
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  2008-01       Impact factor: 10.048

5.  A protocol for evaluation of similarity measures for non-rigid registration.

Authors:  Darko Skerl; Bostjan Likar; Franjo Pernus
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2007-06-22       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Evaluation of volume-based and surface-based brain image registration methods.

Authors:  Arno Klein; Satrajit S Ghosh; Brian Avants; B T T Yeo; Bruce Fischl; Babak Ardekani; James C Gee; J J Mann; Ramin V Parsey
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2010-02-01       Impact factor: 6.556

7.  Multimodality image registration by maximization of mutual information.

Authors:  F Maes; A Collignon; D Vandermeulen; G Marchal; P Suetens
Journal:  IEEE Trans Med Imaging       Date:  1997-04       Impact factor: 10.048

8.  Accurate three-dimensional registration of CT, PET, and/or MR images of the brain.

Authors:  C A Pelizzari; G T Chen; D R Spelbring; R R Weichselbaum; C T Chen
Journal:  J Comput Assist Tomogr       Date:  1989 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 1.826

9.  3D simulation of PET brain images using segmented MRI data and positron tomograph characteristics.

Authors:  Y Ma; M Kamber; A C Evans
Journal:  Comput Med Imaging Graph       Date:  1993 Jul-Oct       Impact factor: 4.790

10.  Retrospective geometric correlation of MR, CT, and PET images.

Authors:  D N Levin; C A Pelizzari; G T Chen; C T Chen; M D Cooper
Journal:  Radiology       Date:  1988-12       Impact factor: 11.105

View more
  3 in total

1.  Spatial Mutual Information as Similarity Measure for 3-D Brain Image Registration.

Authors:  Qolamreza R Razlighi; Nasser Kehtarnavaz
Journal:  IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med       Date:  2014-01-09       Impact factor: 3.316

2.  An overview of image registration for aligning mass spectrometry imaging with clinically relevant imaging modalities.

Authors:  Benjamin Balluff; Ron M A Heeren; Alan M Race
Journal:  J Mass Spectrom Adv Clin Lab       Date:  2021-12-18

3.  The benefits of skull stripping in the normalization of clinical fMRI data.

Authors:  F Ph S Fischmeister; I Höllinger; N Klinger; A Geissler; M C Wurnig; E Matt; J Rath; S D Robinson; S Trattnig; R Beisteiner
Journal:  Neuroimage Clin       Date:  2013-09-30       Impact factor: 4.881

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.