AIM: To distinguish acinar cell carcinoma (ACC) from pancreatic adenocarcinoma (AC) by comparing their computed tomography findings. METHODS: Patients with ACC and AC were identified on the basis of results obtained using surgically resected pancreatectomy specimens. The preoperative computer tomographic images of 6 acinar cell carcinoma patients and 67 pancreatic adenocarcinoma patients in 4 phases (non-contrast, arterial, portal venous, and delayed phase) were compared. The scan delay times were 40, 70, and 120 s for each contrast-enhanced phase. The visual pattern, tomographic attenuation value, and time attenuation curve were assessed and compared between AC and ACC cases using the χ² test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and Mann Whitney U test. RESULTS: The adenocarcinomas tended to be hypodense in all 4 phases. The acinar cell carcinomas also tended to be hypodense in the 3 contrast-enhanced phases, although their computed tomographic attenuation values were higher. Further, 5 of the 6 acinar cell carcinomas (83%) were isodense in the non-contrast phase. The time attenuation curve of the adenocarcinomas showed a gradual increase through the 4 phases, and all adenocarcinomas showed peak enhancement during the delayed phase. The time attenuation curve of the acinar cell carcinomas showed peak enhancement during the portal venous phase in 4 cases and during the arterial phase in 2 cases. None of the 6 acinar cell carcinomas showed peak enhancement during the delayed phase. CONCLUSION: The tumor density in the non-contrast phase and time attenuation curve pattern clearly differ between acinar cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas, and multidetector-row computed tomography can thus distinguish these tumors.
AIM: To distinguish acinar cell carcinoma (ACC) from pancreatic adenocarcinoma (AC) by comparing their computed tomography findings. METHODS:Patients with ACC and AC were identified on the basis of results obtained using surgically resected pancreatectomy specimens. The preoperative computer tomographic images of 6 acinar cell carcinomapatients and 67 pancreatic adenocarcinomapatients in 4 phases (non-contrast, arterial, portal venous, and delayed phase) were compared. The scan delay times were 40, 70, and 120 s for each contrast-enhanced phase. The visual pattern, tomographic attenuation value, and time attenuation curve were assessed and compared between AC and ACC cases using the χ² test, Wilcoxon signed-rank test, and Mann Whitney U test. RESULTS: The adenocarcinomas tended to be hypodense in all 4 phases. The acinar cell carcinomas also tended to be hypodense in the 3 contrast-enhanced phases, although their computed tomographic attenuation values were higher. Further, 5 of the 6 acinar cell carcinomas (83%) were isodense in the non-contrast phase. The time attenuation curve of the adenocarcinomas showed a gradual increase through the 4 phases, and all adenocarcinomas showed peak enhancement during the delayed phase. The time attenuation curve of the acinar cell carcinomas showed peak enhancement during the portal venous phase in 4 cases and during the arterial phase in 2 cases. None of the 6 acinar cell carcinomas showed peak enhancement during the delayed phase. CONCLUSION: The tumor density in the non-contrast phase and time attenuation curve pattern clearly differ between acinar cell carcinomas and adenocarcinomas, and multidetector-row computed tomography can thus distinguish these tumors.
Authors: A Fabre; A Sauvanet; J F Flejou; J Belghiti; L Palazzo; P Ruszniewski; P Ruzniewski; C Degott; B Terris Journal: Virchows Arch Date: 2001-03 Impact factor: 4.064
Authors: H Demachi; O Matsui; S Kobayashi; Y Akakura; K Konishi; M Tsuji; A Miwa; S Miyata Journal: J Comput Assist Tomogr Date: 1997 Nov-Dec Impact factor: 1.826
Authors: Servet Tatli; Koenraad J Mortele; Angela D Levy; Jonathan N Glickman; Pablo R Ros; Peter A Banks; Stuart G Silverman Journal: AJR Am J Roentgenol Date: 2005-02 Impact factor: 3.959
Authors: Rainer Christoph Miksch; Tobias S Schiergens; Maximilian Weniger; Matthias Ilmer; Philipp M Kazmierczak; Markus O Guba; Martin K Angele; Jens Werner; Jan G D'Haese Journal: World J Clin Cases Date: 2020-11-06 Impact factor: 1.337