BACKGROUND: Quisinostat (JNJ-26481585) is a second-generation pyrimidyl-hydroxamic acid histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor with high cellular potency towards Class I and II HDACs. Quisinostat was selected for clinical development as it showed prolonged pharmacodynamic effects in vivo and demonstrated improved single agent antitumoral efficacy compared to other analogs. PROCEDURES: Quisinostat was tested against the PPTP in vitro panel at concentrations ranging from 1.0 nM to 10 μM and was tested against the PPTP in vivo panels at a dose of 5 mg/kg (solid tumors) or 2.5 mg/kg (ALL models) administered intraperitoneally daily × 21. RESULTS: In vitro quisinostat demonstrated potent cytotoxic activity, with T/C% values approaching 0% for all of the cell lines at the highest concentration tested. The median relative IC50 value for the PPTP cell lines was 2.2 nM (range <1-19 nM). quisinostat induced significant differences in EFS distribution compared to control in 21 of 33 (64%) of the evaluable solid tumor xenografts and in 4 of 8 (50%) of the evaluable ALL xenografts. An objective response was observed in 1 of 33 solid tumor xenografts while for the ALL panel, two xenografts achieved complete response (CR) or maintained CR, and a third ALL xenograft achieved stable disease. CONCLUSIONS: Quisinostat demonstrated broad activity in vitro, and retarded growth in the majority of solid tumor xenografts studied. The most consistent in vivo activity signals observed were for the glioblastoma xenografts and T-cell ALL xenografts.
BACKGROUND:Quisinostat (JNJ-26481585) is a second-generation pyrimidyl-hydroxamic acid histone deacetylase (HDAC) inhibitor with high cellular potency towards Class I and II HDACs. Quisinostat was selected for clinical development as it showed prolonged pharmacodynamic effects in vivo and demonstrated improved single agent antitumoral efficacy compared to other analogs. PROCEDURES: Quisinostat was tested against the PPTP in vitro panel at concentrations ranging from 1.0 nM to 10 μM and was tested against the PPTP in vivo panels at a dose of 5 mg/kg (solid tumors) or 2.5 mg/kg (ALL models) administered intraperitoneally daily × 21. RESULTS: In vitro quisinostat demonstrated potent cytotoxic activity, with T/C% values approaching 0% for all of the cell lines at the highest concentration tested. The median relative IC50 value for the PPTP cell lines was 2.2 nM (range <1-19 nM). quisinostat induced significant differences in EFS distribution compared to control in 21 of 33 (64%) of the evaluable solid tumor xenografts and in 4 of 8 (50%) of the evaluable ALL xenografts. An objective response was observed in 1 of 33 solid tumor xenografts while for the ALL panel, two xenografts achieved complete response (CR) or maintained CR, and a third ALL xenograft achieved stable disease. CONCLUSIONS:Quisinostat demonstrated broad activity in vitro, and retarded growth in the majority of solid tumor xenografts studied. The most consistent in vivo activity signals observed were for the glioblastoma xenografts and T-cell ALL xenografts.
Authors: Min H Kang; Malcolm A Smith; Christopher L Morton; Nino Keshelava; Peter J Houghton; C Patrick Reynolds Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2010-10-04 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Swati S More; Melissa Itsara; Xiaodong Yang; Ethan G Geier; Michelle K Tadano; Youngho Seo; Henry F Vanbrocklin; William A Weiss; Sabine Mueller; Daphne A Haas-Kogan; Steven G Dubois; Katherine K Matthay; Kathleen M Giacomini Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2011-03-18 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Thorsten Stühmer; Janine Arts; Manik Chatterjee; Johanna Borawski; André Wolff; Peter King; Hermann Einsele; Eugen Leo; Ralf C Bargou Journal: Br J Haematol Date: 2010-03-13 Impact factor: 6.998
Authors: L C Sambucetti; D D Fischer; S Zabludoff; P O Kwon; H Chamberlin; N Trogani; H Xu; D Cohen Journal: J Biol Chem Date: 1999-12-03 Impact factor: 5.157
Authors: Maryam Fouladi; Julie R Park; Clinton F Stewart; Richard J Gilbertson; Paula Schaiquevich; Junfeng Sun; Joel M Reid; Matthew M Ames; Roseanne Speights; Ashish M Ingle; James Zwiebel; Susan M Blaney; Peter C Adamson Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2010-07-06 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Balaji Venugopal; Richard Baird; Rebecca S Kristeleit; Ruth Plummer; Richard Cowan; Adam Stewart; Nele Fourneau; Peter Hellemans; Yusri Elsayed; Steve McClue; Johan W Smit; Ann Forslund; Charles Phelps; John Camm; T R Jeffry Evans; Johann S de Bono; Udai Banerji Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2013-06-05 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Philip Lee; Ben Murphy; Rickey Miller; Vivek Menon; Naren L Banik; Pierre Giglio; Scott M Lindhorst; Abhay K Varma; William A Vandergrift; Sunil J Patel; Arabinda Das Journal: Anticancer Res Date: 2015-02 Impact factor: 2.480
Authors: Edward F Attiyeh; John M Maris; Richard Lock; C Patrick Reynolds; Min H Kang; Hernan Carol; Richard Gorlick; E Anders Kolb; Stephen T Keir; Jianrong Wu; Yosef Landesman; Sharon Shacham; Dmitry Lyalin; Raushan T Kurmasheva; Peter J Houghton; Malcolm A Smith Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2015-09-23 Impact factor: 3.167
Authors: Sauradip Chaudhuri; Martha J Fowler; Cassandra Baker; Sylwia A Stopka; Michael S Regan; Lindsey Sablatura; Colton W Broughton; Brandon E Knight; Sarah E Stabenfeldt; Nathalie Y R Agar; Rachael W Sirianni Journal: ACS Appl Mater Interfaces Date: 2021-04-27 Impact factor: 9.229
Authors: Gadi Lalazar; David Requena; Lavoisier Ramos-Espiritu; Denise Ng; Patrick D Bhola; Ype P de Jong; Ruisi Wang; Nicole J C Narayan; Bassem Shebl; Solomon Levin; Eleftherios Michailidis; Mohammad Kabbani; Koen O A Vercauteren; Arlene M Hurley; Benjamin A Farber; William J Hammond; James A Saltsman; Ethan M Weinberg; J Fraser Glickman; Barbara A Lyons; Jessica Ellison; Erik Schadde; Martin Hertl; Jennifer L Leiting; Mark J Truty; Rory L Smoot; Faith Tierney; Tomoaki Kato; Hans-Guido Wendel; Michael P LaQuaglia; Charles M Rice; Anthony Letai; Philip Coffino; Michael S Torbenson; Michael V Ortiz; Sanford M Simon Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2021-06-14 Impact factor: 39.397