Andrew Bulloch1, Jeanne Williams, Dina Lavorato, Scott Patten. 1. Department of Community Health Sciences, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; Department of Psychiatry, University of Calgary, Calgary, Canada; Mathison Mental Health Center for Research and Education, Hotchkiss Brain Institute, Calgary, Canada.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: A history of past major depressive episodes (MDEs) is known to be a risk factor for future MDEs. Additional information about the relationship between past and future episodes would be useful in clinical practice, it is therefore important to fully understand the epidemiology of major depression. We asked whether the number of previous MDEs is related to the probability of recurrence in the general population. METHODS: Data were used from the Canadian National Population Health Survey (NPHS) that was repeated every 2 years from 1994/1995 to 2009/2010 (i.e., nine cycles). Prior year depression was assessed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Short Form (CIDI-SF). We estimated the total number of MDEs in individuals over the first eight cycles and examined recurrence in the ninth cycle. These analyses employed a generalized linear model (identity link) where recurrence in cycle 9 was the outcome and the predictor variables were age, gender, and the number of MDEs in the first eight cycles. RESULTS: The risk for recurrence of depression in cycle 9 was found to progressively increase with the number of prior episodes, reaching a value of greater than 46% when the number of prior episodes was five to eight. Independent of this association, the risk of recurrence was greater in younger people and women, but the strength of association of these variables was much weaker for past episodes. CONCLUSIONS: MDE recurrence strongly depended on the number of preceding episodes. Those at highest risk of recurrence can be easily identified by their number of past episodes.
BACKGROUND: A history of past major depressive episodes (MDEs) is known to be a risk factor for future MDEs. Additional information about the relationship between past and future episodes would be useful in clinical practice, it is therefore important to fully understand the epidemiology of major depression. We asked whether the number of previous MDEs is related to the probability of recurrence in the general population. METHODS: Data were used from the Canadian National Population Health Survey (NPHS) that was repeated every 2 years from 1994/1995 to 2009/2010 (i.e., nine cycles). Prior year depression was assessed with the Composite International Diagnostic Interview Short Form (CIDI-SF). We estimated the total number of MDEs in individuals over the first eight cycles and examined recurrence in the ninth cycle. These analyses employed a generalized linear model (identity link) where recurrence in cycle 9 was the outcome and the predictor variables were age, gender, and the number of MDEs in the first eight cycles. RESULTS: The risk for recurrence of depression in cycle 9 was found to progressively increase with the number of prior episodes, reaching a value of greater than 46% when the number of prior episodes was five to eight. Independent of this association, the risk of recurrence was greater in younger people and women, but the strength of association of these variables was much weaker for past episodes. CONCLUSIONS: MDE recurrence strongly depended on the number of preceding episodes. Those at highest risk of recurrence can be easily identified by their number of past episodes.
Authors: Bruno R Barros; Alexander Schacht; Michael Happich; Foula Televantou; Lovisa Berggren; Daniel J Walker; Hector J Dueñas Journal: Prim Care Companion CNS Disord Date: 2014-10-02
Authors: Jamie C Kennedy; Boadie W Dunlop; Linda W Craighead; Charles B Nemeroff; Helen S Mayberg; W Edward Craighead Journal: J Consult Clin Psychol Date: 2018-02
Authors: Anastacia Y Kudinova; Katie L Burkhouse; Greg Siegle; Max Owens; Mary L Woody; Brandon E Gibb Journal: Psychophysiology Date: 2016-09-27 Impact factor: 4.016
Authors: Nina Sarubin; Sven Hilbert; Felix Naumann; Peter Zill; Anna-Maria Wimmer; Caroline Nothdurfter; Rainer Rupprecht; Thomas C Baghai; Markus Bühner; Cornelius Schüle Journal: Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci Date: 2016-08-22 Impact factor: 5.270
Authors: Renske C Bosman; Ruth C Waumans; Gabriel E Jacobs; Richard C Oude Voshaar; Anna D T Muntingh; Neeltje M Batelaan; Anton J L M van Balkom Journal: Psychother Psychosom Date: 2018-07-24 Impact factor: 17.659
Authors: Ruth Ann Marrie; Scott B Patten; Lindsay I Berrigan; Helen Tremlett; Christina Wolfson; Sharon Warren; Stella Leung; Kirsten M Fiest; Kyla A McKay; John D Fisk Journal: Int J MS Care Date: 2018 Mar-Apr
Authors: Ana Maria Baptista Menezes; Joseph Murray; Mitzi László; Fernando C Wehrmeister; Pedro C Hallal; Helen Gonçalves; Maria Cecilia F Assunção; Carolina Baptista Menezes; Fernando C Barros Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 3.240