Literature DB >> 2403764

Evaluation and treatment of the dominant dorsal duct syndrome (pancreas divisum redefined).

A L Warshaw1, J F Simeone, R H Schapiro, B Flavin-Warshaw.   

Abstract

The controversial association of pancreatitis and pancreas divisum was studied in 100 patients (77 women, 23 men, median age 35) with episodic acute pancreatitis (49%) or "pancreatic pain" (51%). Seventy-one had classic pancreas divisum (type 1); 23 had only a dorsal duct with an absent Wirsung's duct (type 2); and 6 had a filamentous connection between the two duct systems (type 3). Accessory papilla sphincteroplasty was performed in 88 patients, with a mean follow-up of 53 months. The orifice was stenotic at the mucosal level in 66 patients. Seventy percent of patients have shown improvement: 85% if the accessory papilla was stenotic, compared with 27% if it was not (p less than 0.0001); and 82% with discrete attacks, compared with 56% with chronic pain (p = 0.002). Judged against intraoperative calibration of accessory papilla orifice diameter, ultrasonography with secretin stimulation was 78% sensitive for accessory papilla stenosis, with 3% false-positive results. Ultrasonography with secretin stimulation was the best predictor of surgical success: positive = 92% success (attacks or pain) versus negative = 40% success (64% with attacks; 21% with pain). There have been seven restenoses with six reoperations. We conclude that (1) pancreas divisum is but one variety of pancreatic anatomy characterized by a dominant dorsal duct and dependence on secretion through the accessory papilla; (2) accessory papilla stenosis appears to be a necessary cofactor to produce a morbid state, whether episodic pancreatitis or pancreatic pain; (3) presentation with pancreatitis and a positive result on the ultrasound-secretin test are the best predictors of successful accessory papilla sphincteroplasty.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2403764     DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9610(05)80607-5

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Surg        ISSN: 0002-9610            Impact factor:   2.565


  38 in total

1.  Pancreas divisum: opinio divisa.

Authors:  L Quest; M Lombard
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 23.059

2.  Radio-anatomic study of the pancreatic duct by MR cholangiopancreatography.

Authors:  C Aubé; N Hentati; J-Y Tanguy; H-D Fournier; X Papon; J Lebigot; P Mercier
Journal:  Surg Radiol Anat       Date:  2003-03-08       Impact factor: 1.246

3.  Chronic alcoholic pancreatitis with pancreas divisum.

Authors:  Tsuneo Tanaka; Yasuhiro Matsugu; Tatsuyoshi Fujii; Tatsuroh Ishimoto; Naoki Kagawa; Yasuhiko Fukuda; Takashi Nishizaka
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2004-06       Impact factor: 3.199

4.  Management of pancreas divisum.

Authors:  J Steven Burdick; Edward Horvath
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Gastroenterol       Date:  2006-09

5.  Pancreas: what is in a name?

Authors:  Vinay Kumar Kapoor
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2006-03       Impact factor: 3.452

Review 6.  Pancreatic sphincterotomy and sphincteroplasty.

Authors:  P Watanapa; R C Williamson
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1992-07       Impact factor: 23.059

7.  Pancreas divisum does not modify the natural course of chronic pancreatitis.

Authors:  Julius Spicak; Petra Poulova; Jitka Plucnarova; Marek Rehor; Helena Filipova; Tomas Hucl
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2007-03-12       Impact factor: 7.527

8.  Utility of fusion CT-PET in the diagnosis of small pancreatic carcinoma.

Authors:  Brian Kim-Poh Goh; Yu-Meng Tan; Yaw-Fui Alexander Chung
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2005-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  Ileal pouch-anal anastomosis for Crohn's disease.

Authors:  R K Phillips
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 23.059

10.  Sphincter of Oddi dysfunction and acute pancreatitis.

Authors:  J W Chen; G T Saccone; J Toouli
Journal:  Gut       Date:  1998-09       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.