Literature DB >> 24037347

A metric for the stiffness of calcified aortic valves using a combined computational and experimental approach.

Hoda Maleki1, Shahrokh Shahriari, Louis G Durand, Michel R Labrosse, Lyes Kadem.   

Abstract

Calcific aortic valve disease is the most common heart valve disease. It is associated with a significant increase in cardiovascular morbidity and mortality and independently increases the cardiovascular risk. It is then important to develop parameters that can estimate the stiffness of the valve. Such parameters may contribute to early detection of the disease or track its progression and optimize the timing for therapy. In this study, we introduce a metric representing the stiffness of the native aortic calcified valve over a wide range of stenosis severities. Our approach is based on three-dimensional structural finite-element simulations and in vitro measurements. The proposed method is developed first in a pulse duplicator; its clinical applicability is then evaluated in three patients with severe aortic stenosis. Our results indicate that the value of the proposed metric varies considerably between healthy valves and valves with very severe aortic stenosis, from 0.001 to 7.38 MPa, respectively. The method introduced in this study could give useful information regarding the stiffness of the valve leaflets with potential application to the evaluation of aortic sclerosis and aortic stenosis.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24037347     DOI: 10.1007/s11517-013-1113-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   2.602


  17 in total

Review 1.  Timing of aortic valve surgery.

Authors:  C M Otto
Journal:  Heart       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 5.994

2.  A nonlinear anisotropic model for porcine aortic heart valves.

Authors:  J Li; X Y Luo; Z B Kuang
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 2.712

3.  Evaluation and clinical implications of aortic valve calcification measured by electron-beam computed tomography.

Authors:  David Messika-Zeitoun; Marie-Christine Aubry; Delphine Detaint; Lawrence F Bielak; Patricia A Peyser; Patrick F Sheedy; Stephen T Turner; Jerome F Breen; Christopher Scott; A Jamil Tajik; Maurice Enriquez-Sarano
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2004-07-12       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  Structural analysis of the natural aortic valve in dynamics: from unpressurized to physiologically loaded.

Authors:  Michel R Labrosse; Keegan Lobo; Carsten J Beller
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2010-04-07       Impact factor: 2.712

5.  2008 Focused update incorporated into the ACC/AHA 2006 guidelines for the management of patients with valvular heart disease: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Writing Committee to Revise the 1998 Guidelines for the Management of Patients With Valvular Heart Disease): endorsed by the Society of Cardiovascular Anesthesiologists, Society for Cardiovascular Angiography and Interventions, and Society of Thoracic Surgeons.

Authors:  Robert O Bonow; Blase A Carabello; Kanu Chatterjee; Antonio C de Leon; David P Faxon; Michael D Freed; William H Gaasch; Bruce W Lytle; Rick A Nishimura; Patrick T O'Gara; Robert A O'Rourke; Catherine M Otto; Pravin M Shah; Jack S Shanewise
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 29.690

6.  Age-related changes in aortic and mitral valve thickness: implications for two-dimensional echocardiography based on an autopsy study of 200 normal human hearts.

Authors:  Y Sahasakul; W D Edwards; J M Naessens; A J Tajik
Journal:  Am J Cardiol       Date:  1988-09-01       Impact factor: 2.778

7.  Estimation of aortic valve effective orifice area by Doppler echocardiography: effects of valve inflow shape and flow rate.

Authors:  Damien Garcia; Philippe Pibarot; Champlain Landry; Amélie Allard; Boris Chayer; Jean G Dumesnil; Louis-Gilles Durand
Journal:  J Am Soc Echocardiogr       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.251

8.  Finite element stress analysis of left ventricular mechanics in the beating dog heart.

Authors:  J M Guccione; K D Costa; A D McCulloch
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  1995-10       Impact factor: 2.712

9.  Projected valve area at normal flow rate improves the assessment of stenosis severity in patients with low-flow, low-gradient aortic stenosis: the multicenter TOPAS (Truly or Pseudo-Severe Aortic Stenosis) study.

Authors:  Claudia Blais; Ian G Burwash; Gerald Mundigler; Jean G Dumesnil; Nicole Loho; Florian Rader; Helmut Baumgartner; Rob S Beanlands; Boris Chayer; Lyes Kadem; Damien Garcia; Louis-Gilles Durand; Philippe Pibarot
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2006-02-07       Impact factor: 29.690

10.  A computational model of aging and calcification in the aortic heart valve.

Authors:  Eli J Weinberg; Frederick J Schoen; Mohammad R K Mofrad
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  4 in total

1.  The impact of the aortic valve impairment on the distant coronary arteries hemodynamics: a fluid-structure interaction study.

Authors:  Hossein Mohammadi; Raymond Cartier; Rosaire Mongrain
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2017-03-18       Impact factor: 2.602

2.  Biomechanical evaluation of the pathophysiologic developmental mechanisms of mitral valve prolapse: effect of valvular morphologic alteration.

Authors:  Ahnryul Choi; David D McPherson; Hyunggun Kim
Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput       Date:  2015-08-26       Impact factor: 2.602

Review 3.  Inflammatory and Biomechanical Drivers of Endothelial-Interstitial Interactions in Calcific Aortic Valve Disease.

Authors:  Katherine Driscoll; Alexander D Cruz; Jonathan T Butcher
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  2021-04-29       Impact factor: 17.367

4.  Population-specific material properties of the implantation site for transcatheter aortic valve replacement finite element simulations.

Authors:  Giorgia M Bosi; Claudio Capelli; Mun Hong Cheang; Nicola Delahunty; Michael Mullen; Andrew M Taylor; Silvia Schievano
Journal:  J Biomech       Date:  2018-02-20       Impact factor: 2.712

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.