Literature DB >> 24036892

Testing the mutant selection window hypothesis with Escherichia coli exposed to levofloxacin in a rabbit tissue cage infection model.

W Ni1, X Song, J Cui.   

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to test the mutant selection window (MSW) hypothesis with Escherichia coli exposed to levofloxacin in a rabbit model and to compare in vivo and in vitro exposure thresholds that restrict the selection of fluoroquinolone-resistant mutants. Local infection with E. coli was established in rabbits, and the infected animals were treated orally with various doses of levofloxacin once a day for five consecutive days. Changes in levofloxacin concentration and levofloxacin susceptibility were monitored at the site of infection. The MICs of E. coli increased when levofloxacin concentrations at the site of infection fluctuated between the lower and upper boundaries of the MSW, defined in vitro as the minimum inhibitory concentration (MIC99) and the mutant prevention concentration (MPC), respectively. The pharmacodynamic thresholds at which resistant mutants are not selected in vivo was estimated as AUC24/MPC > 20 h or AUC24/MIC > 60 h, where AUC24 is the area under the drug concentration time curve in a 24-h interval. Our finding demonstrated that the MSW existed in vivo. The AUC24/MPC ratio that prevented resistant mutants from being selected estimated in vivo is consistent with that observed in vitro, indicating it might be a reliable index for guiding the optimization of antimicrobial treatment regimens for suppression of the selection of antimicrobial resistance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24036892     DOI: 10.1007/s10096-013-1968-8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis        ISSN: 0934-9723            Impact factor:   3.267


  26 in total

1.  Temporal interplay between efflux pumps and target mutations in development of antibiotic resistance in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  Renu Singh; Michelle C Swick; Kimberly R Ledesma; Zhen Yang; Ming Hu; Lynn Zechiedrich; Vincent H Tam
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2012-01-09       Impact factor: 5.191

2.  Influence of inoculum size on the selection of resistant mutants of Escherichia coli in relation to mutant prevention concentrations of marbofloxacin.

Authors:  Aude Ferran; Véronique Dupouy; Pierre-Louis Toutain; Alain Bousquet-Mélou
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2007-08-20       Impact factor: 5.191

3.  Mutant prevention concentration-based pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic indices as dosing targets for suppressing the enrichment of levofloxacin-resistant subpopulations of Staphylococcus aureus.

Authors:  Beibei Liang; Nan Bai; Yun Cai; Rui Wang; Karl Drlica; Xilin Zhao
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2011-02-22       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Contribution of mutations in DNA gyrase and topoisomerase IV genes to ciprofloxacin resistance in Escherichia coli clinical isolates.

Authors:  Sandhya Bansal; Vibha Tandon
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2011-01-13       Impact factor: 5.283

5.  Prevalence and risk factors for quinolone resistance among Escherichia coli strains isolated from males with community febrile urinary tract infection.

Authors:  A Smithson; C Chico; J Ramos; C Netto; M Sanchez; J Ruiz; R Porron; M T Bastida
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2011-07-15       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Modeling antibiotic resistance to project future rates: quinolone resistance in Escherichia coli.

Authors:  L K Durham; M Ge; A J Cuccia; J P Quinn
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 7.  Restricting the selection of antibiotic-resistant mutants: a general strategy derived from fluoroquinolone studies.

Authors:  X Zhao; K Drlica
Journal:  Clin Infect Dis       Date:  2001-09-15       Impact factor: 9.079

8.  Effect of N-1/c-8 ring fusion and C-7 ring structure on fluoroquinolone lethality.

Authors:  Muhammad Malik; Kevin R Marks; Heidi A Schwanz; Nadezhda German; Karl Drlica; Robert J Kerns
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2010-09-20       Impact factor: 5.191

9.  Does mutation in gyrA and/or parC or efflux pump expression play the main role in fluoroquinolone resistance in Escherichia coli urinary tract infections?: A statistical analysis study.

Authors:  Katsumi Shigemura; Kazushi Tanaka; Fukashi Yamamichi; Toshiro Shirakawa; Hideaki Miyake; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Int J Antimicrob Agents       Date:  2012-10-13       Impact factor: 5.283

10.  Emergence of resistant Streptococcus pneumoniae in an in vitro dynamic model that simulates moxifloxacin concentrations inside and outside the mutant selection window: related changes in susceptibility, resistance frequency and bacterial killing.

Authors:  Stephen H Zinner; Irene Yu Lubenko; Deborah Gilbert; Kelly Simmons; Xilin Zhao; Karl Drlica; Alexander A Firsov
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2003-09-01       Impact factor: 5.790

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  What Antibiotic Exposures Are Required to Suppress the Emergence of Resistance for Gram-Negative Bacteria? A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Chandra Datta Sumi; Aaron J Heffernan; Jeffrey Lipman; Jason A Roberts; Fekade B Sime
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Revisiting the mutant prevention concentration to guide dosing in childhood tuberculosis.

Authors:  Devan Jaganath; H Simon Schaaf; Peter R Donald
Journal:  J Antimicrob Chemother       Date:  2017-07-01       Impact factor: 5.790

3.  In Vitro Resistance Selection in Shigella flexneri by Azithromycin, Ceftriaxone, Ciprofloxacin, Levofloxacin, and Moxifloxacin.

Authors:  George P Allen; Kayla A Harris
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2017-06-27       Impact factor: 5.191

4.  Suppression of Reactive Oxygen Species Accumulation Accounts for Paradoxical Bacterial Survival at High Quinolone Concentration.

Authors:  Gan Luan; Yuzhi Hong; Karl Drlica; Xilin Zhao
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2018-02-23       Impact factor: 5.191

5.  Testing the mutant selection window hypothesis in vitro and in vivo with Staphylococcus aureus exposed to fosfomycin.

Authors:  Q Mei; Y Ye; Y-L Zhu; J Cheng; X Chang; Y-Y Liu; H-R Li; J-B Li
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2014-11-26       Impact factor: 3.267

6.  Validation of the mutant selection window hypothesis with fosfomycin against Escherichia coli and Pseudomonas aeruginosa: an in vitro and in vivo comparative study.

Authors:  Ai-Jun Pan; Qing Mei; Ying Ye; Hong-Ru Li; Bao Liu; Jia-Bin Li
Journal:  J Antibiot (Tokyo)       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 2.649

7.  Determination of the Mutant Selection Window and Evaluation of the Killing of Mycoplasma gallisepticum by Danofloxacin, Doxycycline, Tilmicosin, Tylvalosin and Valnemulin.

Authors:  Nan Zhang; Xiaomei Ye; Yuzhi Wu; Zilong Huang; Xiaoyan Gu; Qinren Cai; Xiangguang Shen; Hongxia Jiang; Huanzhong Ding
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 8.  Fluoroquinolone heteroresistance, antimicrobial tolerance, and lethality enhancement.

Authors:  Amit Singh; Xilin Zhao; Karl Drlica
Journal:  Front Cell Infect Microbiol       Date:  2022-09-29       Impact factor: 6.073

9.  In vivo antimicrobial activity of marbofloxacin against Pasteurella multocida in a tissue cage model in calves.

Authors:  Changfu Cao; Ying Qu; Meizhen Sun; Zhenzhen Qiu; Xianhui Huang; Binbin Huai; Yan Lu; Zhenling Zeng
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2015-07-24       Impact factor: 5.640

10.  Relationship between Cefquinome PK/PD Parameters and Emergence of Resistance of Staphylococcus aureus in Rabbit Tissue-Cage Infection Model.

Authors:  Mingpeng Xiong; Xun Wu; Xiaomei Ye; Longfei Zhang; Shuyi Zeng; Zilong Huang; Yuzhi Wu; Jian Sun; Huanzhong Ding
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2016-06-07       Impact factor: 5.640

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.