Literature DB >> 24036540

Poisoning the "histone code" in pediatric gliomagenesis.

Peter W Lewis1, C David Allis.   

Abstract

Entities:  

Keywords:  DIPG; H3F3A; PRC2; epigenetic; glioma; histone

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24036540      PMCID: PMC3885631          DOI: 10.4161/cc.26356

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cell Cycle        ISSN: 1551-4005            Impact factor:   4.534


× No keyword cloud information.
Exome sequencing of high-grade pediatric gliomas, including supratentorial glioblastomas (GBM) and diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas (DIPG) identified missense mutations Lys27Met (K27M) and Gly34Arg/Val (G34R/V) in genes encoding histone H3.3 (H3F3A) and H3.1 (HIST3H1B).- The high occurrence and unique age distribution of histone H3 mutant tumors suggest that these mutations may block glial cell differentiation, perhaps in a mechanism akin to leukemic fusion proteins that “drive” cellular transformation via blockage of hematopoiesis. H3K27 is methylated by the Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 (PRC2) for X-chromosome inactivation and gene silencing. Mutation or aberrant regulation of genes encoding chromatin regulators are highly tumor-type specific, as exemplified by the PRC2 catalytic subunit EZH2, which is overexpressed in a number of epithelial malignancies and lost or mutated in subsets of leukemia and lymphomas. These observations suggest that misregulation of H3K27 modification is common in tumorigenesis, but occurs only in very specific cell lineage and developmental contexts. Recently, we and others observed nearly undetectable levels of H3K27me2/3 levels in gliomas encoding the K27M histone H3.- We found that H3 K27M histone protein contributed to a minority of total H3 protein (3–17%) in these tumors. The invariant and heterozygous nature of the mutation (only 1 mutant H3 allele out of 32 encoding H3 per diploid cell) suggests that the K27M H3 histone promotes gliomagenesis through a powerful dominant-negative mechanism. In exploring the biochemical process, we found that H3 K27M peptides are potent inhibitors of PRC2 activity. Furthermore, H3 K27M peptides containing a photo-reactive methionine analog specifically crosslinked the SET-domain active site of EZH2, indicating that K27M likely competes with substrate binding and turnover. We demonstrated that H3 K27M transgenes that contribute a few percent of total H3 protein were sufficient to severely reduce H3K27me3 amounts in cell culture. After surveying all possible amino acid substitutions, only K27I transgenes exhibited similar, albeit slightly less, inhibitory activity on PRC2 in vitro and on H3K27me3 levels in vivo. This biochemical observation may prove prescient; a single adenine-thymine transversion in the K27 “AAA” codon found in several H3 genes will produce the “ATA” codon encoding Isoleucine. While not yet reported, the existence of an H3 K27I mutation in pediatric gliomas or other cancers is conceivable and should be investigated. Norleucine, a leucine isomer, was the most potent inhibitor of PRC2 activity in vitro. The extended, unbranched aliphatic side chain of norleucine likely makes superior interactions with the aromatic and hydrophobic residues that line the SET domain active site. The catalytic core of SET domains is highly conserved, and we explored the possibility that other histone methyltransferases (HMTs) might be similarly sensitive to K-to-M substitutions at their cognate peptidyl–lysine substrates. We found that K9M and K36M H3 transgenes in cultured cells decreased overall amounts of H3K9me3 and H3K36me3, respectively. Interestingly, H3 K4M transgenes reduced overall H3K4me2/3 amounts only slightly. This poor inhibitor activity may be a consequence of atypical SET domain proteins, or possibly the reported inhibition of FAD-dependent amine oxidases LSD1/2 by N-terminal H3 peptides containing K4M in vitro. Notably, Jumonji domain-containing histone demethylases, such as UTX, that target K9, K27, and K36 methylation lack an active site configuration of hydrophobic and aromatic co-enzymes and residues, and are therefore unlikely inhibited by K-to-M substitutions. Similarly, HMTs that lack SET domains, such as DOT1L, are not sensitive to K-to-M substitutions at their substrate site (i.e., H3 K79M). How might K-to-M transgene-mediated inhibition occur in vivo? The estimated nuclear concentration of a unique histone H3 protein that makes up 3–5% of total H3 approaches 10µM. This histone concentration is similar to the IC50 we measured for K-to-M inhibition of SET domain proteins in vitro (1–6 µM). Additionally, specific deposition pathways exist to enrich histones H3.1 and H3.3 at distinct genomic locations.8 Yet, DIPG samples containing the K27M mutation in either H3.1 or H3.3 exhibit the same decrease in H3K27me3, indicating that nuclear concentration, rather than genomic location, is important for PRC2 inhibition. The notable lack of PRC2 subunit gene mutations detected in pediatric GBM or DIPG suggests that the H3 K27M mutation may promote a nuanced adjustment, rather than a en masse de-repression of PRC2 silenced genes (Fig. 1). Indeed, Chan et al. recently observed a marked decrease in the overall number of H3K27me3 peaks by ChIP sequencing in glioma cells containing H3 K27M. Surprisingly, the remaining H3K27me3 peaks in these cells spanned larger chromatin domains, had increased H3K27me3 density, and also correlated with enhanced gene silencing. How inhibition of some PRC2 complexes leads to enhanced PRC2-mediated gene repression remains a key mechanistic question.

Figure 1. At genes PRC2 molecules are recruited via Jarid2 and sequence-specific factors for H3K27me3-mediated silencing (A). Intergenic PRC2 may rely on positive feedback loops established through interaction between the H3K27me3 and the EED subunit (B). The intergenic PRC2-K27me3 positive feedback loop is possibly disrupted in glioma cells containing the H3 K27M protein (C). Contrastingly, genic H3K27me3 levels increase in K27M-containing cells, leading to enhanced gene silencing (D).

Figure 1. At genes PRC2 molecules are recruited via Jarid2 and sequence-specific factors for H3K27me3-mediated silencing (A). Intergenic PRC2 may rely on positive feedback loops established through interaction between the H3K27me3 and the EED subunit (B). The intergenic PRC2-K27me3 positive feedback loop is possibly disrupted in glioma cells containing the H3 K27M protein (C). Contrastingly, genic H3K27me3 levels increase in K27M-containing cells, leading to enhanced gene silencing (D). Additional questions remain, including the cell-of-origin of tumors containing the mutant histones, as well as how these mutations affect pathways that contribute to tumor initiation or progression. The high incidence and exclusivity of histone H3 mutations to pediatric gliomas highlights the importance of a specific cell-of-origin that is exquisitely susceptible to these mutations, as well as potential cooperating mutations that could collectively drive gliomagenesis. Indeed, p53-null postnatal mice transduced with H3 K27M failed to develop gliomas, indicating a requirement for developmental context and/or additional mutations. Future studies that address these questions will ultimately lead to more effective treatments for these tumors.
  8 in total

1.  Driver mutations in histone H3.3 and chromatin remodelling genes in paediatric glioblastoma.

Authors:  Jeremy Schwartzentruber; Andrey Korshunov; Xiao-Yang Liu; David T W Jones; Elke Pfaff; Karine Jacob; Dominik Sturm; Adam M Fontebasso; Dong-Anh Khuong Quang; Martje Tönjes; Volker Hovestadt; Steffen Albrecht; Marcel Kool; Andre Nantel; Carolin Konermann; Anders Lindroth; Natalie Jäger; Tobias Rausch; Marina Ryzhova; Jan O Korbel; Thomas Hielscher; Peter Hauser; Miklos Garami; Almos Klekner; Laszlo Bognar; Martin Ebinger; Martin U Schuhmann; Wolfram Scheurlen; Arnulf Pekrun; Michael C Frühwald; Wolfgang Roggendorf; Christoph Kramm; Matthias Dürken; Jeffrey Atkinson; Pierre Lepage; Alexandre Montpetit; Magdalena Zakrzewska; Krzystof Zakrzewski; Pawel P Liberski; Zhifeng Dong; Peter Siegel; Andreas E Kulozik; Marc Zapatka; Abhijit Guha; David Malkin; Jörg Felsberg; Guido Reifenberger; Andreas von Deimling; Koichi Ichimura; V Peter Collins; Hendrik Witt; Till Milde; Olaf Witt; Cindy Zhang; Pedro Castelo-Branco; Peter Lichter; Damien Faury; Uri Tabori; Christoph Plass; Jacek Majewski; Stefan M Pfister; Nada Jabado
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  Evaluation of histone 3 lysine 27 trimethylation (H3K27me3) and enhancer of Zest 2 (EZH2) in pediatric glial and glioneuronal tumors shows decreased H3K27me3 in H3F3A K27M mutant glioblastomas.

Authors:  Sriram Venneti; Mihir T Garimella; Lisa M Sullivan; Daniel Martinez; Jason T Huse; Adriana Heguy; Mariarita Santi; Craig B Thompson; Alexander R Judkins
Journal:  Brain Pathol       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 6.508

3.  Inhibition of PRC2 activity by a gain-of-function H3 mutation found in pediatric glioblastoma.

Authors:  Peter W Lewis; Manuel M Müller; Matthew S Koletsky; Francisco Cordero; Shu Lin; Laura A Banaszynski; Benjamin A Garcia; Tom W Muir; Oren J Becher; C David Allis
Journal:  Science       Date:  2013-03-28       Impact factor: 47.728

4.  A novel mammalian flavin-dependent histone demethylase.

Authors:  Aristotele Karytinos; Federico Forneris; Antonella Profumo; Giuseppe Ciossani; Elena Battaglioli; Claudia Binda; Andrea Mattevi
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2009-04-30       Impact factor: 5.157

5.  The histone H3.3K27M mutation in pediatric glioma reprograms H3K27 methylation and gene expression.

Authors:  Kui-Ming Chan; Dong Fang; Haiyun Gan; Rintaro Hashizume; Chuanhe Yu; Mark Schroeder; Nalin Gupta; Sabine Mueller; C David James; Robert Jenkins; Jann Sarkaria; Zhiguo Zhang
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2013-04-19       Impact factor: 11.361

6.  Distinct factors control histone variant H3.3 localization at specific genomic regions.

Authors:  Aaron D Goldberg; Laura A Banaszynski; Kyung-Min Noh; Peter W Lewis; Simon J Elsaesser; Sonja Stadler; Scott Dewell; Martin Law; Xingyi Guo; Xuan Li; Duancheng Wen; Ariane Chapgier; Russell C DeKelver; Jeffrey C Miller; Ya-Li Lee; Elizabeth A Boydston; Michael C Holmes; Philip D Gregory; John M Greally; Shahin Rafii; Chingwen Yang; Peter J Scambler; David Garrick; Richard J Gibbons; Douglas R Higgs; Ileana M Cristea; Fyodor D Urnov; Deyou Zheng; C David Allis
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2010-03-05       Impact factor: 41.582

7.  K27M mutation in histone H3.3 defines clinically and biologically distinct subgroups of pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas.

Authors:  Dong-Anh Khuong-Quang; Pawel Buczkowicz; Patricia Rakopoulos; Xiao-Yang Liu; Adam M Fontebasso; Eric Bouffet; Ute Bartels; Steffen Albrecht; Jeremy Schwartzentruber; Louis Letourneau; Mathieu Bourgey; Guillaume Bourque; Alexandre Montpetit; Genevieve Bourret; Pierre Lepage; Adam Fleming; Peter Lichter; Marcel Kool; Andreas von Deimling; Dominik Sturm; Andrey Korshunov; Damien Faury; David T Jones; Jacek Majewski; Stefan M Pfister; Nada Jabado; Cynthia Hawkins
Journal:  Acta Neuropathol       Date:  2012-06-03       Impact factor: 17.088

8.  Somatic histone H3 alterations in pediatric diffuse intrinsic pontine gliomas and non-brainstem glioblastomas.

Authors:  Gang Wu; Alberto Broniscer; Troy A McEachron; Charles Lu; Barbara S Paugh; Jared Becksfort; Chunxu Qu; Li Ding; Robert Huether; Matthew Parker; Junyuan Zhang; Amar Gajjar; Michael A Dyer; Charles G Mullighan; Richard J Gilbertson; Elaine R Mardis; Richard K Wilson; James R Downing; David W Ellison; Jinghui Zhang; Suzanne J Baker
Journal:  Nat Genet       Date:  2012-01-29       Impact factor: 38.330

  8 in total
  15 in total

Review 1.  Oncogenic Mechanisms of Histone H3 Mutations.

Authors:  Daniel N Weinberg; C David Allis; Chao Lu
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 6.915

2.  Nucleosome Positioning by an Evolutionarily Conserved Chromatin Remodeler Prevents Aberrant DNA Methylation in Neurospora.

Authors:  Andrew D Klocko; Miki Uesaka; Tereza Ormsby; Michael R Rountree; Elizabeth T Wiles; Keyur K Adhvaryu; Shinji Honda; Eric U Selker
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-12-15       Impact factor: 4.562

3.  Identification of new therapeutic targets and natural compounds against diffuse intrinsic pontine glioma (DIPG).

Authors:  Jungang Chen; Zhen Lin; Lindsey Barrett; Lu Dai; Zhiqiang Qin
Journal:  Bioorg Chem       Date:  2020-04-13       Impact factor: 5.275

4.  Use of human embryonic stem cells to model pediatric gliomas with H3.3K27M histone mutation.

Authors:  Kosuke Funato; Tamara Major; Peter W Lewis; C David Allis; Viviane Tabar
Journal:  Science       Date:  2014-11-20       Impact factor: 47.728

Review 5.  Investigational new drugs for brain cancer.

Authors:  Verena Staedtke; Ren-Yuan Bai; John Laterra
Journal:  Expert Opin Investig Drugs       Date:  2016-05-17       Impact factor: 6.206

6.  Proteomic approaches for cancer epigenetics research.

Authors:  Dylan M Marchione; Benjamin A Garcia; John Wojcik
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2018-11-27       Impact factor: 3.940

7.  S-adenosyl methionine is necessary for inhibition of the methyltransferase G9a by the lysine 9 to methionine mutation on histone H3.

Authors:  Hariharan Jayaram; Dominik Hoelper; Siddhant U Jain; Nico Cantone; Stefan M Lundgren; Florence Poy; C David Allis; Richard Cummings; Steven Bellon; Peter W Lewis
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2016-05-16       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Polycomb Repressive Complex 2 Methylates Elongin A to Regulate Transcription.

Authors:  M Behfar Ardehali; Anthony Anselmo; Jesse C Cochrane; Sharmistha Kundu; Ruslan I Sadreyev; Robert E Kingston
Journal:  Mol Cell       Date:  2017-11-16       Impact factor: 17.970

Review 9.  Recognition of cancer mutations in histone H3K36 by epigenetic writers and readers.

Authors:  Brianna J Klein; Krzysztof Krajewski; Susana Restrepo; Peter W Lewis; Brian D Strahl; Tatiana G Kutateladze
Journal:  Epigenetics       Date:  2018-08-23       Impact factor: 4.528

Review 10.  Future Clinical Trials in DIPG: Bringing Epigenetics to the Clinic.

Authors:  Andres Morales La Madrid; Rintaro Hashizume; Mark W Kieran
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2015-07-01       Impact factor: 6.244

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.