Literature DB >> 24036513

Two new sphingolipids from the leaves of Piper betle L.

Duo-Zhi Chen1, Hua-Bin Xiong, Kai Tian, Jun-Ming Guo, Xiang-Zhong Huang, Zhi-Yong Jiang.   

Abstract

Two new sphingolipids, pipercerebrosides A (1) and B (2), were isolated from the leaves of Piper betle L. Their structures, including absolute configurations, were determined by spectroscopic analysis and chemical degradation. These two compounds did not show significant cytotoxic activity against the cancer cell lines K562 and HL-60 in a MTT assay.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24036513      PMCID: PMC6270174          DOI: 10.3390/molecules180911241

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Molecules        ISSN: 1420-3049            Impact factor:   4.411


1. Introduction

The stems and/or leaves of Piper betle L., an evergreen perennial creeper plant widely distributed in the south of China, are used as Chinese Traditional Medicines to cure stomachache, wind-cold cough, sore and furuncle, and eczema [1]. This plant has been known to contain chemical compounds, such as alkaloids, steroids, phenols, and terpenes, with a wide range of bioactivities, like antioxidant, antifungal, antiulcerogenic, antiplatelet, antidiabetic, anti-inflammatory, antifilarial, and antimicrobial activity [2,3,4]. In a previous study, we extracted P. betle stems collected from western China with acetone. This extract, from which eight piper amides and two lignans were isolated, showed antioxidant activity in a 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl radical (DPPH), scavenging assay and antibacterial activity in a disc diffusion test [5]. Our continuing studies on the leaves of the plant has now led to the isolation of two new sphingolipids, pipercerebrosides A (1) and B (2) and other five known sphingolipids, 3-octadecenamide, 3-eicosenamide, agelasphin-11, agelasphin-7a and agelasphin-13. Sphingolipids have been found to have anti-tumor, immunostimulatory, neuritogenic, antiviral, antifungal, and nematicidal activities [6,7,8]. In this paper we present the isolation and structural elucidation of the new compounds.

2. Results and Discussion

2.1. Structure Analysis of Pipercerebroside A

Compound 1 was isolated as a white amorphous powder. Its molecular formula was determined to be C35H67NO10 by HRESIMS (m/z 662.4797 [M + H]+, calcd. for 662.4799). The IR spectrum of 1 showed absorption bands for hydroxyl groups at 3,385 cm−1 and for a secondary amide at 1,653 cm−1. The 1H- and 13C-NMR (Table 1) spectra of 1 indicated the presence of a β-d-glucopyranosyl moiety (δH 4.14, 1H, d, J = 7.6 Hz, anomeric proton; δC 103.9, 73.9, 77.3, 70.4, 76.9, and 61.5), an amide linkage (δH 7.55, 1H, d, J = 8.6 Hz; δC 174.3), two olefinic methines [δH 5.28 (1H, dt, J = 10.0, 5.0 Hz) and 5.35 (1H, dt, J = 10.0, 5.0 Hz); δC 129.5 and 130.3], an amidomethine (δH 3.97, δC 50.4), an oxygenated methylene (δH 3.96 and 3.66; δC 69.5), three oxygenated methines (δH 3.46, 3.53 and 3.81; δC 71.1, 74.3 and 71.5), two terminal methyls (δH 0.83, 6H, t, J = 6.5 Hz) and two long-chain aliphatic moieties appearing as a multiplets (δH 1.20-1.30). All of the above spectral data revealed that 1 was a glycosphingolipid [9,10].
Table 1

1H (500 MHz) and 13C-NMR (125 MHz) data for 1 (in DMSO) and 2 (in pyridine-d5) .

No.1 No.2
δ H δ C δ H δ C
1a3.66 (dd, 1H, 10.5, 4.0 Hz)3.96 (dd, 1H, 10.5, 4.0 Hz)69.5 t 1a4.42 (dd, 1H, 10.0, 4.5 Hz)4.50 (dd, 1H, 10.0, 4.5 Hz)62.9 t
1b 1b
23.97 (m, 1H)50.4 d 25.16 (m, 1H)54.0 d
33.53 (m, 1H)74.3 d 34.35 (m, 1H)77.1 d
43.46 (m, 1H)71.1 d 44.30 (m, 1H)73.9 d
5a1.48 (m, 1H)32.1 t5a2.02 (m, 1H)34.2 t
5b1.90 (m, 1H) 5b2.19 (m, 1H)
61.20–1.30 (m, 2H)26.1 t61.96 (m, 2H)27.5 t
71.97 (m, 2H)27.4 t 7–91.26–1.32 (m, 6H)30.5–30.9 t
85.35 (dt, 1H, 10.0,5.0 Hz)130.3 d 10a2.05 (m, 1H)34.2 t
95.28 (dt, 1H, 10.0,5.0 Hz)129.5 d 10b2.29 (m, 1H)
101.97 (m, 2H)27.2 t115.52 (dt, 1H, 15.0, 6.0 Hz)131.7
11–141.20–1.30 (m, 8H)29.0–29.6t 125.52 (dt, 1H, 15.0, 6.0 Hz)131.6
151.20–1.30 (m, 2H)31.8 t 13a2.03 (m, 1H)33.8 t
161.20–1.30 (m, 2H)22.6 t 13b2.17 (m, 1H)
170.83 (t, 3H, 6.5 Hz)14.2 q 14–201.26–1.32 (m, 14H)30.5–30.9 t
NH7.55 (d, 1H, 8.6 Hz) 211.26–1.32 (m, 2H)33.0 t
1′ 174.3 s 221.26–1.32 (m, 2H)23.8 t
2′3.81 (dd, 1H, 7.5, 4.0 Hz)71.5 d 230.87 (t, 3H, 6.5 Hz)15.1 q
3′a1.48 (m, 1H)34.8 t NH8.58 (d, 1H, 9.0 Hz)
3′b2.00 (m, 1H) 1′ 174.9 s
4′1.20–1.30 (m, 2H)24.9 t 2′4.56 (dd, 1H, 7.5, 4.0 Hz)73.7 d
5′–9′1.20–1.30 (m, 10H)29.0–29.6t 3′a2.05 (m, 1H)34.8 t
10′1.20–1.30 (m, 2H)31.8 t3′b2.21 (m, 1H)
11′1.20–1.30 (m, 2H)22.6 t 4′a1.65 (m, 1H)
12′0.83 (t, 3H, 6.5 Hz)14.2 q 4′b1.96 (m, 1H)27.4 t
1′′4.14 (d, 1H, 7.6 Hz),103.9 5′–21′1.26–1.32 (m, 32H)30.5–30.9 t
2′′2.95 (t, 1H, 8.0 Hz)73.9 22′1.26–1.32 (m, 2H)33.0 t
3′′3.13 (m, 1H)77.3 23′1.26–1.32 (m, 2H)23.8 t
4′′3.02 (m, 1H)70.4 24′0.87 (t, 3H, 6.5 Hz)15.1 q
5′′3.10 (m, 1H)76.9
6′′a3.56 (dd, 1H, 12.0,5.0Hz)61.5
6′′b3.70 (m, 1H)

Signals were assigned by means of 1H-1H COSY, HSQC and HMBC.

1H (500 MHz) and 13C-NMR (125 MHz) data for 1 (in DMSO) and 2 (in pyridine-d5) . Signals were assigned by means of 1H-1H COSY, HSQC and HMBC. Analysis of the 1H-1H COSY, HMQC, and HMBC spectra led to the assignment of proton and carbon signals for 1. Methanolysis of 1 yielded a fatty acid methyl ester 1a and a long-chain base 1b (Scheme 1). Compound 1a was identified as 2-hydroxydodecanoic acid methyl ester −1.2 (c 0.07, CHCl3) by means of GC/MS analysis, and the absolute configuration of C-2′ was determined to be R from the specific rotation [11]. The phytosphingosine part is thus a C17 aliphatic amino alcohol unit with three hydroxyls, an amino group, and an olefinic bond. The 2S, 3S, and 4R configurations of the ceramide moieties were assigned by comparing the specific rotation +9.6 (c 0.11, pyridine)], 1H-NMR, and 13C-NMR data of compound 1 with those of the known synthetic ceramide (2S,3S,4R)-2-[(2′R)-2′-hydroxytetracosanoylamino]-1,3,4-hexadecanetriol [12] and the natural ceramide 1-O-β-d-glucopyranosyl-(2S,3S,4R,8E)-2-[(2′R)-2′-hydroxybehenoylamino]-8-octadecene-1,3,4-triol [13]. To determine the position of the olefinic bond in the dihydrosphingosine moiety, KMnO4 oxidation [14] was performed on compound 1b to yield nonanoic acid (1a) (Scheme 1), which was methylated and detected by GC/MS. This indicated the location of the olefinic bond between C-8 and C-9. The ∆ [8,9] olefinic bond was confirmed to have a (Z)-configuration as evidenced by the vicinal coupling constants (J = 10.0 Hz), together with the chemical shifts of C-7 (δ 27.4) and C-10 (δ 27.2). Analysis of the 1H-1H COSY, HMQC, and HMBC spectra led to the assignment of proton and carbon signals for 1. Methanolysis of 1 yielded a fatty acid methyl ester 1a and a long-chain base 1b (Scheme 1). Compound 1a was identified as 2-hydroxydodecanoic acid methyl ester −1.2 (c 0.07, CHCl3) by means of GC/MS analysis, and the absolute configuration of C-2′ was determined to be R from the specific rotation [11]. The phytosphingosine part is thus a C17 aliphatic amino alcohol unit with three hydroxyls, an amino group, and an olefinic bond. The 2S, 3S, and 4R configurations of the ceramide moieties were assigned by comparing the specific rotation +9.6 (c 0.11, pyridine)], 1H-NMR, and 13C-NMR data of compound 1 with those of the known synthetic ceramide (2S,3S,4R)-2-[(2′R)-2′-hydroxytetracosanoylamino]-1,3,4-hexadecanetriol [12] and the natural ceramide 1-O-β-d-glucopyranosyl-(2S,3S,4R,8E)-2-[(2′R)-2′-hydroxybehenoylamino]-8-octadecene-1,3,4-triol [13]. To determine the position of the olefinic bond in the dihydrosphingosine moiety, KMnO4 oxidation [14] was performed on compound 1b to yield nonanoic acid (1a) (Scheme 1), which was methylated and detected by GC/MS. This indicated the location of the olefinic bond between C-8 and C-9. The ∆ [8,9] olefinic bond was confirmed to have a (Z)-configuration as evidenced by the vicinal coupling constants (J = 10.0 Hz), together with the chemical shifts of C-7 (δ 27.4) and C-10 (δ 27.2) .
Scheme 1

Methanolysis, oxidation and methylation of pipercerebroside A.

Methanolysis, oxidation and methylation of pipercerebroside A. Due to the fact that signals of the carbons adjacent to a (Z)-configuration olefinic bond usually appear at δ 27.0–28.0 [15], whereas those of a (E)-configuration olefinic bond normally appear at δ 32.0–34.0 [9,16]. Consequently, the structure of 1 was determined to be 1-O-(β-D-glucopyranosyl)-(2S,3S,4R,8Z)-2-{[(2R)-2-hydroxyldodecanoyl] amino}heptadec-8-ene-1,3,4-triol (Figure 1), named pipercerebroside A.
Figure 1

Structures of two new sfingolipids (pipercerebrosides) from the leaves of Piper betle L.

Structures of two new sfingolipids (pipercerebrosides) from the leaves of Piper betle L.

2.2. Structure Analysis of Pipercerebroside B

Pipercerebroside B was isolated as a white amorphous powder. Its molecular formula was determined to be C46H91NO5 by HRESIMS (m/z 738.6966 [M + H]+, calcd. for 738.6975). The IR spectrum of 2 showed absorption bands for hydroxyl groups at 3,480 cm−1 and for a secondary amide at 1,640 cm−1. The 1H- and 13C-NMR (Table 1) spectra of 2 indicated the presence of an amide linkage (δH 8.58, 1H, d, J = 9.0 Hz; δC 174.9), two olefinic methines [δH 5.52 (2H, dt, J = 15.0, 6.0 Hz); δC 131.6 and 131.7], an amidomethine (δH 5.16, δC 54.0), an oxygenated methylene (δH 4.50 and 4.42; δC 62.9), three oxygenated methines (δH 4.30, 4.35 and 4.56; δC 73.9, 77.1 and 73.7), and Two terminal methyls (δH 0.87, 6H, t, J = 6.5 Hz) and two long-chain aliphatic moieties appearing as a multiplets (δH 1.26–1.32). All of the above spectral data revealed that 2 was also a sphingolipid [17,18]. Analysis of the 1H-1H COSY, HMQC, and HMBC spectra assigned the proton and carbon signals for 2. Methanolysis of 2 yielded a fatty acid methyl ester (FAME) and a long chain base (LCB). The FAME compound was identified as 2-hydroxydodecanoic acid methyl ester by means of GC/MS analysis {EI: m/z 398, [ −1.4 (c 0.09, CHCl3)]} and the absolute configuration of C-2′ was determined to be R as in compound 1. Thus, the LCB part is a C23 aliphatic amino alcohol unit containing three hydroxyls, an amino group and a double bond. The dihydrosphingosine (LCB) moiety was oxidized to yield undecanoic acid, which was methylated and detected by GC/MS. This indicated that the double bond was located at C-11. The 11,12 alkene bond was shown to be trans by the large vicinal coupling constants (J = 15.0). The trans geometry of this double bond was also supported by the chemical shift of C-10 (δ 34.2) and C-13 (δ 33.8). Usually, the signals of the carbons adjacent to a trans double bond appear at δ 32-34, while those of a cis double bond appear at δ 27–28 [9,16]. Therefore, the structure of 2 was determined to be (2S,3S,4R,11E)-2-{[(2R)-2-hydroxytetracosanoyl] amino}tricos-11-ene-1,3,4-triol (Figure 1), named pipercerebroside B.

2.3. Cytotoxic Activity of Compounds

The two compounds were evaluated for their cytotoxic activity. None of them showed considerable inhibitory cytotoxic activity against cancer cell lines K562 and HL-60 at the concentration of 10 μM in a MTT assay.

3. Experimental

3.1. General

All reagents were analytical grade and water was distilled twice. TLC was preformed with silica gel GF254 (Marine Chemical Industry Factory, Qingdao, China), and the spots were visualized by spraying with 10% H2SO4/EtOH reagent. Column chromatography was performed using silica gel (Marine Chemical Industry Factory, Qingdao, China), reverse-phase C18 silica gel (Merck, Darmstadt, Germany) and Sephadex LH-20 (Sigma). Melting points were measured with an X-4 melting point apparatus and are uncorrected. Optical rotations were recorded on a Perkin-Elmer 241 polarimeter. UV spectra were obtained on a Perkin-Elmer Lambda 900 UV/VIS/NIR spectrophotometer. IR spectra were obtained on a Perkin-Elmer 577 spectrometer with KBr pellets.-NMR Spectra were recorded on a Bruker AV 500 spectrometer (1H, 500 MHz; 13C, 125 MHz), and chemical shifts are presented as values relative to tetramethylsilane as an internal standard. Low-resolution electrospray-ionization mass spectrometry (ESI-MS) and HR-ESI-MS were recorded on a Finnigan LCQ-Advantage mass spectrometer and a VG Auto-Spec-3000 mass spectrometer. Gas chromatography-mass spectrometer (GC-MS) experiments were performed on a Shimadzu GC-17A gas chromatograph apparatus (DB-5 capillary column: 30 m × 0.25 mm × 0.25 μm, helium flow rate: 0.8 ml/min) attached to a Shimadzu GCMS-QP5050A mass spectrometry equipped with an electron impact (EI) ion source (70 eV). The column was maintained at 100 °C for 1 min and then ramped from 100 to 260 °C at a rate of 4 °C/min with a final hold at 260 °C for 15 min.

3.2. Plant Resource

The leaves of Piper betle were collected from Baoshan city of Yunnan Province in China, in October 2010. It was identified by Prof. Shaobin Ma (Department of Biology, Yunnan University). The stems were harvested and air-dried at room temperature in shade. A voucher specimen (No. 20101020) was deposited in School of Chemistry and Biotechnology, Yunnan University of Nationalities, China.

3.3. Extraction and Isolation of New Compounds

The dried leaves (6.8 kg) of P. betle were extracted with 70% acetone (40 L × 3) under reflux (4 h). The acetone extract was evaporated to almost dryness in vacuo, and the resulting mixture (760 g) was suspended in water before being successively partitioned with petroleum ether, ethyl acetate, and n-butanol (2 L × 7). The ethyl acetate phase was concentrated to produce a black mass (177 g), which was separated into 11 fractions on a silica gel column using step gradient elution with CHCl3-MeOH (1:0–0:1). Fraction 3 (5.2 g) was applied to a Sephadex LH-20 column using MeOH-CHCl3 (1:2) as a solvent to afford seven subfractions. Subfraction 3–5 (2.7 g) was similarly chromatographed on a Sephadex LH-20 column eluted from 50% MeOH in CHCl3 to obtain eight fractions, of which the second fraction (230 mg) was purified by an RP-18 silica gel column eluted with MeOH-H2O (70:30–85:15) to provide compound 1 (28 mg). Subfraction 3–2 (640 mg) was subjected to a silica gel column using CHCl3-MeOH (20:1) as the eluent, yielding compound 2 (13 mg).

3.4. Methanolysis, Oxidation and Methylation of Pipercerebroside A

Pipercerebroside A (3 mg) was refluxed with 0.9 mol L−1 HCl in 82% aqueous MeOH (5 mL) for 18 h [19]. The resulting solution was extracted three times with n-hexane. The n-hexane solution was washed with water (5 mL) and dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 then concentrated to yield compound 1a (1.1 mg). Compound 1a was identified by analysis of GC-MS. After evaporation of MeOH, the H2O layer was neutralized with ammonia liquid and extracted with Et2O. The Et2O layer was then dried over anhydrous Na2SO4 and concentrated to obtain compound 1b (0.8 mg). 2-Hydroxy-dodecanoic acid methyl ester (1a): colorless oil, -1.2 (c 0.07, CHCl3); GC-MS: GC, tR 39.41 min, EI-MS m/z: 171 [M − CH3OCO]+ (39), 127 [C9H19]+ (6), 111 (17), 97 (74), 90 [CH3OC(OH)=CH OH]+ (45), 83 (72), 69 (89), 55 (91), 43 (100). Compound 1b (0.8 mg) was dissolved in 10% H2SO4 and acetone (2.0 mL each). KMnO4 (50 mg) was then added to the solution and stirred overnight at room temperature [16,20]. The reaction was then quenched with aqueous Na2S2O3 (5%). After removal of acetone, the reaction mixture was extracted with Et2O. The Et2O layer was dried over Na2SO4 and concentrated to yield the residue, which was methylated using CH2N2 in Et2O at 0 °C [20]. The reaction mixture was kept in ice for 30 min before being allowed to stand at room temperature overnight. This procedure resulted in compound 1c (0.4 mg), which was identified as methyl nonanoate by GC-MS. GC, tR 21.30 min, EI-MS m/z: 172 [M]+ (5), 141 [M − OCH3]+ (11), 129 (9), 87 (46), 74 (100), 69 (7), 55 (19), 43 (23).

3.5. Methanolysis, Oxidation and Methylation of Pipercerebroside B

Pipercerebroside B (3 mg) was treated under the same conditions mentioned above to afford 2-hydroxytetracosanoic acid methyl ester (0.9 mg) and methyl undecanoate (0.3 mg). 2-Hydroxytetracosanoic acid methyl ester: colorless oil, -1.4 (c 0.09, CHCl3); GC-MS: GC, tR 54.38 min, EI-MS m/z: 398 [M]+ (11), 339 [M − CH3OCO]+ (9), 281 (5), 207 (10), 145 (4), 127 (6), 111 (12), 97 (27), 90 [CH3OC(OH)=CHOH]+ (28), 83 (27), 57 (58), 44 (100). Methyl undecanoate: GC-MS: GC, tR 24.36 min, EI-MS m/z: 200 [M]+ (4), 169 [M − OCH3]+ (5), 157 (4), 143 (7), 101 (6), 87 (47), 74 (100), 69 (8), 55 (16), 43 (22).

3.6. Spectral data of New Compounds

Pipercerebroside A: white amorphous powder; mp 191–192 °C; + 9.6 (c 0.11, pyridine); IR (KBr) νmax: 3385, 3178, 2922, 2853, 1653, 1543, 1463, 1402, 1083, 932 cm−1; ESI(+)-MS m/z: 662 [M + H]+, 684 [M + Na]+, 500 [M + H − glu]+; HRESI(+)-MS m/z: 662.4797 [M + H]+ (calcd. for C35H68O10N, 662.4799). Pipercerebroside B: white amorphous powder; mp 191–192 °C; + 3.7 (c 0.19, pyridine); IR (CH3OH) νmax: 3480, 2940, 2860, 1640, 1506, and 1297 cm−1; ESI(+)-MS m/z: 738 [M + H]+; HRESI(+)-MS m/z: 738.6966 [M + H]+ (calcd. for C46H92NO5, 738.6975).

3.7. Bioassay

Inhibition of cell-growth activity was determined by a MTT assay using human chronic myelogenous leukemia cells (K562) and human promyelocytic leukemia cells [21]. cis-Diamminedichloroplatinum (DDP) was used as a positive control. None of the compounds showed any obvious cytotoxic effect against the cancer cell lines K562 and HL-60.

4. Conclusions

Two new sphingolipids, pipercerebrosides A (1) and B (2), were isolated from the leaves of Piper betle. L. Their structures including absolute configurations were determined by spectroscopic analysis 1D-NMR, 2D-NMR and MS experiment and chemical degradation. None of the compounds showed any significant cytotoxic activity against the cancer cell lines K562 and HL-60 at a concentration of 10 μM in the MTT assay.
  9 in total

1.  Isolation of a new cerebroside from the root bark of aralia elata

Authors: 
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  1999-07       Impact factor: 4.050

2.  New cerebrosides from Euphorbia peplis L.: antimicrobial activity evaluation.

Authors:  Francesca Cateni; Jelena Zilic; Gioacchino Falsone; Giuditta Scialino; Elena Banfi
Journal:  Bioorg Med Chem Lett       Date:  2003-12-15       Impact factor: 2.823

3.  New ceramides from Rantherium suaveolens.

Authors:  M Habib Oueslati; Zine Mighri; H Ben Jannet; Pedro M Abreu
Journal:  Lipids       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 1.880

4.  Iridoid glycosides and grayanane diterpenoids from the roots of Craibiodendron henryi.

Authors:  Xiang-zhong Huang; Ying-hong Wang; Shi-shan Yu; Guang-miao Fu; You-cai Hu; Yue Liu; Li-hua Fan
Journal:  J Nat Prod       Date:  2005-11       Impact factor: 4.050

5.  Five new cytotoxic triterpenoid saponins from the roots of Symplocos chinensis.

Authors:  Guang-Miao Fu; Ying-Hong Wang; Song Gao; Mei-Jun Tang; Shi-Shan Yu
Journal:  Planta Med       Date:  2005-07       Impact factor: 3.352

Review 6.  Piper betel Linn (betel vine), the maligned Southeast Asian medicinal plant possesses cancer preventive effects: time to reconsider the wronged opinion.

Authors:  Manoj P Rai; Karadka Ramdas Thilakchand; Princy L Palatty; Prathima Rao; Suresh Rao; Harshith P Bhat; Manjeshwar Shrinath Baliga
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2011

7.  Cyclooxygenase-2 inhibitory cerebrosides from phytolaccae radix.

Authors:  S S Kang; J S Kim; K H Son; H P Kim; H W Chang
Journal:  Chem Pharm Bull (Tokyo)       Date:  2001-03       Impact factor: 1.645

8.  Glycocerebroside bearing a novel long-chain base from Sagina japonica (Caryophyllaceae).

Authors:  Ai-Qun Jia; Xu Yang; Wei-Xin Wang; Yong-Hong Jia
Journal:  Fitoterapia       Date:  2010-01-18       Impact factor: 2.882

9.  Cerebrosides from the roots of Serratula chinensis.

Authors:  Tiejun Ling; Tao Xia; Xiaochun Wan; Daxiang Li; Xiaoyi Wei
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2006-09-07       Impact factor: 4.411

  9 in total
  2 in total

Review 1.  Betelvine (Piper betle L.): A comprehensive insight into its ethnopharmacology, phytochemistry, and pharmacological, biomedical and therapeutic attributes.

Authors:  Protha Biswas; Uttpal Anand; Suchismita Chatterjee Saha; Nishi Kant; Tulika Mishra; Harison Masih; Ananya Bar; Devendra Kumar Pandey; Niraj Kumar Jha; Madhumita Majumder; Neela Das; Vijaykumar Shivaji Gadekar; Mahipal S Shekhawat; Manoj Kumar; Jarosław Proćków; José M Pérez de la Lastra; Abhijit Dey
Journal:  J Cell Mol Med       Date:  2022-05-02       Impact factor: 5.295

2.  Two new sphingolipids from the stem bark of Synsepalum msolo (Sapotaceae).

Authors:  Ache Roland Ndifor; Njinga Ngaitad Stanislaus; Chi Godloves Fru; Ferdinand Talontsi; Turibio Kuiate Tabopda; Elisabeth Zeuko'o Menkem; Ngadjui Bonaventure Tchaleu; Yeboah Samuel Owusu
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Rep       Date:  2021-06-11
  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.