Literature DB >> 24036008

Prognosis of patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma who failed first-line systemic therapy.

Yu-Yun Shao1, Chih-Horng Wu2, Li-Chun Lu3, Soa-Yu Chan4, Yu-Yi Ma5, Feng-Chu Yen5, Chih-Hung Hsu6, Ann-Lii Cheng7.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND & AIMS: No approved therapy is available for patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) who fail first-line therapy. The prognosis of these patients, especially those eligible for clinical trials of second-line therapy, is unclear.
METHODS: All patients who participated in clinical trials of first-line systemic therapy for metastatic or locally advanced HCC in a referral center of Taiwan between 2005 and 2011 were included. Their clinicopathologic characteristics, when the first-line treatment failed, were analyzed and correlated with the overall survival (OS) from the date of first-line treatment failure.
RESULTS: A total of 192 patients were included. Before the start of the first-line therapy, all patients had Child-Pugh class A liver reserves and Cancer of the Liver Italian Program (CLIP) scores ≤4. After the failure of the first-line therapy, the median OS of the entire group was 4.0 months. Patients with Child-Pugh class A liver reserves, when the first-line treatment failed, had significantly better OS than patients with Child-Pugh class B or C liver reserves (median, A vs. B vs. C=7.5 vs. 1.3 vs. 1.0 month, p<0.001). According to the key eligibility criteria of 3 published clinical trials for second-line therapy, 41%-56% of patients were potentially eligible. Compared to patients who were ineligible for clinical trials, potentially eligible patients had longer OS with a median of 7.8-8.6 months.
CONCLUSIONS: Patients with advanced HCC who failed first-line therapy could have substantially improved prognosis if they had Child-Pugh A liver reserves or were potentially eligible for clinical trials.
Copyright © 2013 European Association for the Study of the Liver. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  BCLC; Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer; CLIP; Cancer of the Liver Italian Program; Clinical trials; ECOG PS; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status; HCC; Hepatocellular carcinoma; NTUH; National Taiwan University Hospital; OS; Prognosis; Second-line therapy; Survival; TTP; hepatocellular carcinoma; overall survival; time to progression

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24036008     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhep.2013.08.027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hepatol        ISSN: 0168-8278            Impact factor:   25.083


  11 in total

1.  Systemic therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma: why do we keep failing?

Authors:  Bo Hyun Kim; Joong-Won Park
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2014-12-11

Review 2.  Predictive biomarkers of sorafenib efficacy in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma: Are we getting there?

Authors:  Yu-Yun Shao; Chih-Hung Hsu; Ann-Lii Cheng
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2015-09-28       Impact factor: 5.742

Review 3.  Hepatocellular Carcinoma: Therapeutic Guidelines and Medical Treatment.

Authors:  Masatoshi Kudo; Franco Trevisani; Ghassan K Abou-Alfa; Lorenza Rimassa
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2016-11-29       Impact factor: 11.740

Review 4.  Systemic therapy of hepatocellular carcinoma: current status and future perspectives.

Authors:  Domenico Germano; Bruno Daniele
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Increased Expression of Programmed Death-Ligand 1 in Infiltrating Immune Cells in Hepatocellular Carcinoma Tissues after Sorafenib Treatment.

Authors:  Li-Chun Lu; Yi-Hsuan Lee; Chun-Jung Chang; Chia-Tung Shun; Chih-Yeu Fang; Yu-Yun Shao; Tsung-Hao Liu; Ann-Lii Cheng; Chih-Hung Hsu
Journal:  Liver Cancer       Date:  2018-06-15       Impact factor: 11.740

6.  Determinants of survival after sorafenib failure in patients with BCLC-C hepatocellular carcinoma in real-world practice.

Authors:  I-Cheng Lee; Yi-Tzen Chen; Yee Chao; Teh-Ia Huo; Chung-Pin Li; Chien-Wei Su; Han-Chieh Lin; Fa-Yauh Lee; Yi-Hsiang Huang
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.889

Review 7.  How to assess the efficacy or failure of targeted therapy: Deciding when to stop sorafenib in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Jean-Luc Raoul; Xavier Adhoute; Marine Gilabert; Julien Edeline
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2016-12-18

8.  Survival Estimates after Stopping Sorafenib in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma: NEXT Score Development and Validation.

Authors:  Hye Won Lee; Hyun Soo Kim; Seung Up Kim; Do Young Kim; Beom Kyung Kim; Jun Yong Park; Sang Hoon Ahn; Mi Young Jeon; Ja Yoon Heo; Soo Young Park; Yu Rim Lee; Sun Kyung Jang; Su Hyun Lee; Se Young Jang; Won Young Tak; Kwang-Hyub Han
Journal:  Gut Liver       Date:  2017-09-15       Impact factor: 4.519

9.  Metronomic capecitabine versus best supportive care as second-line treatment in hepatocellular carcinoma: a retrospective study.

Authors:  Andrea Casadei Gardini; Flavia Foca; Mario Scartozzi; Nicola Silvestris; Emiliano Tamburini; Luca Faloppi; Oronzo Brunetti; Britt Rudnas; Salvatore Pisconti; Martina Valgiusti; Giorgia Marisi; Francesco Giuseppe Foschi; Giorgio Ercolani; Davide Tassinari; Stefano Cascinu; Giovanni Luca Frassineti
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-02-13       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Metronomic capecitabine as second-line treatment for hepatocellular carcinoma after sorafenib discontinuation.

Authors:  Franco Trevisani; Giovanni Brandi; Francesca Garuti; Maria Aurelia Barbera; Raffaella Tortora; Andrea Casadei Gardini; Alessandro Granito; Francesco Tovoli; Stefania De Lorenzo; Andrea Lorenzo Inghilesi; Francesco Giuseppe Foschi; Mauro Bernardi; Fabio Marra; Rodolfo Sacco; Giovan Giuseppe Di Costanzo
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2017-12-16       Impact factor: 4.322

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.