Catriona C G Jones1, Julie Jomeen2, Mark Hayter2. 1. Faculty of Health and Social Care, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull HU67RX, United Kingdom. Electronic address: c.jones@hull.ac.uk. 2. Faculty of Health and Social Care, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull HU67RX, United Kingdom.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: this paper is a report of a systematic review and meta-ethnography to explore the impact of peer support in the context of perinatal mental illness (PMI). METHOD: systematic review methods identified five qualitative studies about women's experiences of PMI, and the impact peer support has on their journey towards emotional well-being. Findings from the identified studies were synthesised into themes, using meta-ethnography. SYNTHESIS AND FINDINGS: the meta-ethnography produced four themes; 'Isolation: the role of peer support', 'Seeking validation through peer support', 'The importance of social norms of motherhood', and 'Finding affirmation/a way forward; the impact of peer support'. These themes represent women's experiences of PMI, their encounters with peer support groups within that context, and the impact of such encounters on their mental health status. KEY CONCLUSION: recognising the risk of isolation and having pathways of referral to peer support networks is important, as are practitioners roles in nurturing peer support networks in perinatal care. More research is required to establish the most successful formats/structures of peer support. Practitioners should also recognise their individual and collective professional duty to challenge stereotypical depictions of motherhood wherever they arise, as this 'gold standard' benchmark of good mothering engenders guilt about not being good enough, often leaving women feeling inadequate. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: isolation is a key factor in PMI. Practitioners should be instrumental in their acceptance and development of peer support for PMI, ensuring these networks are valued, nurtured and encouraged. This study illustrates the powerful effect of professional and social forces on how new mothers feel about themselves.
OBJECTIVE: this paper is a report of a systematic review and meta-ethnography to explore the impact of peer support in the context of perinatal mental illness (PMI). METHOD: systematic review methods identified five qualitative studies about women's experiences of PMI, and the impact peer support has on their journey towards emotional well-being. Findings from the identified studies were synthesised into themes, using meta-ethnography. SYNTHESIS AND FINDINGS: the meta-ethnography produced four themes; 'Isolation: the role of peer support', 'Seeking validation through peer support', 'The importance of social norms of motherhood', and 'Finding affirmation/a way forward; the impact of peer support'. These themes represent women's experiences of PMI, their encounters with peer support groups within that context, and the impact of such encounters on their mental health status. KEY CONCLUSION: recognising the risk of isolation and having pathways of referral to peer support networks is important, as are practitioners roles in nurturing peer support networks in perinatal care. More research is required to establish the most successful formats/structures of peer support. Practitioners should also recognise their individual and collective professional duty to challenge stereotypical depictions of motherhood wherever they arise, as this 'gold standard' benchmark of good mothering engenders guilt about not being good enough, often leaving women feeling inadequate. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: isolation is a key factor in PMI. Practitioners should be instrumental in their acceptance and development of peer support for PMI, ensuring these networks are valued, nurtured and encouraged. This study illustrates the powerful effect of professional and social forces on how new mothers feel about themselves.
Authors: Andrea Baldwin; Emily Herde; Elisabeth Hoehn; Rebecca Kimble; Helen Funk; Debbie Spink; Sallyanne Keevers; William Bor Journal: J Perinat Educ Date: 2022-04-01
Authors: Kerry Scott; S W Beckham; Margaret Gross; George Pariyo; Krishna D Rao; Giorgio Cometto; Henry B Perry Journal: Hum Resour Health Date: 2018-08-16
Authors: Laura J Biggs; Touran Shafiei; Della A Forster; Rhonda Small; Helen L McLachlan Journal: BMC Pregnancy Childbirth Date: 2015-09-07 Impact factor: 3.007
Authors: Heather M Wasser; Amanda L Thompson; Chirayath M Suchindran; Barbara D Goldman; Eric A Hodges; Meredith J Heinig; Margaret E Bentley Journal: BMC Pediatr Date: 2020-08-18 Impact factor: 2.125