Literature DB >> 24035163

Multidetector row computed tomography parameters associated with paravalvular regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Spyridon Katsanos1, See Hooi Ewe, Philippe Debonnaire, Frank van der Kley, Arend de Weger, Meindert Palmen, Arthur J H A Scholte, Martin J Schalij, Jeroen J Bax, Nina Ajmone Marsan, Victoria Delgado.   

Abstract

Multidetector row computed tomographic (MDCT) assessment of aortic annulus dimensions and frame position and deployment have been associated with paravalvular aortic regurgitation (PAVR) after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI). The present evaluation investigated the (pre- and postprocedure) MDCT associates of PAVR ≥2+. In total, 123 patients referred for TAVI underwent clinical evaluation, transthoracic echocardiography, and pre- and post-TAVI MDCT. Pre-TAVI MDCT measurements of the aortic annular dimensions and post-TAVI MDCT evaluation of the position and deployment of the prosthesis in the native annulus were performed. At 1-month follow-up, PAVR ≥2+ was observed in 25 patients (20%). The difference between the MDCT-derived maximum aortic annulus and the nominal diameters of the implanted prosthesis (odds ratio 1.912, p = 0.002) and shallow position of the frame in the left ventricular outflow tract (<2 mm) (odds ratio 4.865, p = 0.017) were independently related to significant PAVR. A maximum annulus diameter ≥2 mm larger than the nominal frame diameter had 72% sensitivity and 61% specificity to predict PAVR. In conclusion, in patients undergoing TAVI, ≥2-mm difference between maximum aortic annulus and nominal prosthesis diameters and depth of the frame into the left ventricular outflow tract of <2 mm are independently associated with PAVR ≥2+.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24035163     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2013.07.049

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Cardiol        ISSN: 0002-9149            Impact factor:   2.778


  4 in total

1.  Angles between the aortic root and the left ventricle assessed by MDCT are associated with the risk of aortic regurgitation after transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Vincent Roule; Alexandre Placente; Rémi Sabatier; Mathieu Bignon; Vladimir Saplacan; Calin Ivascau; Paul Milliez; Farzin Beygui
Journal:  Heart Vessels       Date:  2017-08-10       Impact factor: 2.037

2.  Pericardial effusion following transcatheter aortic valve implantation: echocardiography and multi-detector row computed tomography evaluation.

Authors:  Spyridon Katsanos; Philippe van Rosendael; Vasileios Kamperidis; Frank van der Kley; Madelien Regeer; Ibtihal Al-Amri; Ioannis Karalis; Meindert Palmen; Arend de Weger; Nina Ajmone Marsan; Jeroen J Bax; Victoria Delgado
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-08-17       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 3.  Biomechanics of Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implant.

Authors:  Francesco Nappi; Sanjeet Singh Avtaar Singh; Pierluigi Nappi; Antonio Fiore
Journal:  Bioengineering (Basel)       Date:  2022-07-04

4.  Temporal Change in Paravalvular Leakage after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement with a Self-Expanding Valve: Impact of Aortic Valve Calcification.

Authors:  Tsung-Yu Ko; Hsien-Li Kao; Yi-Chang Chen; Lung-Chun Lin; Ying-Ju Liu; Chih-Fan Yeh; Ching-Chang Huang; Ying-Hsien Chen; Yih-Sharng Chen; Mao-Shin Lin
Journal:  Acta Cardiol Sin       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.672

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.