OBJECTIVE: Smaller amygdalar volumes have been consistently observed in pediatric bipolar disorder subjects compared to healthy control subjects. Whether smaller amygdalar volume is a consequence or antecedent of the first episode of mania is not known. Additionally, smaller volume has not been localized to specific amygdala subregions. METHODS: We compared surface contour maps of the amygdala between 22 youths at high risk for bipolar disorder, 26 youths meeting full diagnostic criteria for pediatric familial bipolar disorder, and 24 healthy control subjects matched for age, gender, and intelligence quotient. Amygdalae were manually delineated on three-dimensional spoiled gradient echo images by a blinded rater using established tracing protocols. Statistical surface mesh modeling algorithms supported by permutation statistics were used to identify regional surface differences between the groups. RESULTS: When compared to high-risk subjects and controls, youth with bipolar disorder showed surface deformations in specific amygdalar subregions, suggesting smaller volume of the basolateral nuclei. The high-risk subjects did not differ from controls in any subregion. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support previous reports of smaller amygdala volume in pediatric bipolar disorder and map the location of abnormality to specific amygdala subregions. These subregions have been associated with fear conditioning and emotion-enhanced memory. The absence of amygdala size abnormalities in youth at high risk for bipolar disorder suggests that reductions might occur after the onset of mania.
OBJECTIVE: Smaller amygdalar volumes have been consistently observed in pediatric bipolar disorder subjects compared to healthy control subjects. Whether smaller amygdalar volume is a consequence or antecedent of the first episode of mania is not known. Additionally, smaller volume has not been localized to specific amygdala subregions. METHODS: We compared surface contour maps of the amygdala between 22 youths at high risk for bipolar disorder, 26 youths meeting full diagnostic criteria for pediatric familial bipolar disorder, and 24 healthy control subjects matched for age, gender, and intelligence quotient. Amygdalae were manually delineated on three-dimensional spoiled gradient echo images by a blinded rater using established tracing protocols. Statistical surface mesh modeling algorithms supported by permutation statistics were used to identify regional surface differences between the groups. RESULTS: When compared to high-risk subjects and controls, youth with bipolar disorder showed surface deformations in specific amygdalar subregions, suggesting smaller volume of the basolateral nuclei. The high-risk subjects did not differ from controls in any subregion. CONCLUSIONS: These findings support previous reports of smaller amygdala volume in pediatric bipolar disorder and map the location of abnormality to specific amygdala subregions. These subregions have been associated with fear conditioning and emotion-enhanced memory. The absence of amygdala size abnormalities in youth at high risk for bipolar disorder suggests that reductions might occur after the onset of mania.
Authors: Joel Stoddard; Derek Hsu; Richard C Reynolds; Melissa A Brotman; Monique Ernst; Daniel S Pine; Ellen Leibenluft; Daniel P Dickstein Journal: Psychiatry Res Date: 2014-11-20 Impact factor: 3.222
Authors: Pamela B Mahon; David S Lee; Huong Trinh; Daniel Tward; Michael I Miller; Laurent Younes; Patrick E Barta; J Tilak Ratnanather Journal: Schizophr Res Date: 2015-03-09 Impact factor: 4.939
Authors: Aivar Päären; Hannes Bohman; Lars von Knorring; Gunilla Olsson; Anne-Liis von Knorring; Ulf Jonsson Journal: BMC Psychiatry Date: 2014-12-24 Impact factor: 3.630
Authors: Juan David Palacio-Ortiz; María Alejandra Gómez-Valero; Paula Andrea Bustamante-Gómez; Pilar Helena Arroyave-Sierra; Cristian David Vargas-Upeguí; Julián Pineda-Zapata; Gabriel Castrillón; Daniel Camilo Aguirre-Acevedo; Carlos López-Jaramillo Journal: Int J Psychol Res (Medellin) Date: 2019 Jul-Dec
Authors: Sujung Yoon; Jieun E Kim; Geon Ha Kim; Hee Jin Kang; Bori R Kim; Saerom Jeon; Jooyeon Jamie Im; Heejung Hyun; Sohyeon Moon; Soo Mee Lim; In Kyoon Lyoo Journal: PLoS One Date: 2016-06-23 Impact factor: 3.240