Literature DB >> 24034143

Patterns of uptake in a biennial faecal occult blood test screening programme for colorectal cancer.

R J C Steele1, P L McClements, G Libby, F A Carey, C G Fraser.   

Abstract

AIM: The patterns of response in faecal occult blood test (FOBT) screening were studied.
METHOD: A total of 251,578 people invited three times for faecal occult blood testing were categorized according to how they responded to the invitations, as follows: YNN, NYN, NNY, NYY, YNY, YYN, YYY or NNN (Y = response; N = no response).
RESULTS: Overall, 163,038 (64.8%) responded at least once, and of those the biggest category was YYY (98,494, 60.4%). Of 1927 cancers diagnosed in the age group eligible for screening, there were 405 screen-detected cancers, 529 interval cancers and 993 cancers arising in people who had not been screened for over 2 years (i.e. falling outside the interval cancer category). In the YYY group, 79 screen-detected cancers would have been missed had the members of this group responded YNN and 65 had they responded YYN. In the YYN group, 104 screening cancers would have been missed if they had followed the YNN pattern. In most cases, the screen-detected cancers were diagnosed at the last invitation accepted, indicating that, after a diagnosis of cancer, further screening invitations were rarely accepted. Accordingly, the numbers of screen-detected and interval cancers were adjusted for likely pattern of response according to the proportion of the whole population falling into each pattern. With this adjustment, 40.9% of the cancers in the YYY group were screen detected compared with 29.3% in the YYN group and 20.7% in the YNN group (P < 0.001). Among those who responded once, twice and three times, the stage distribution of screen-detected cancers was similar, indicating that the prognosis of screen-detected cancer is unlikely to be poorer if not detected at the first screen.
CONCLUSION: This study is the first to examine patterns of response to screening invitations and confirms the importance to individuals of continuing to accept repeated screening invitations. Colorectal Disease
© 2013 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Colorectal cancer screening; faecal occult bleed test; screening uptake

Mesh:

Year:  2014        PMID: 24034143     DOI: 10.1111/codi.12393

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  16 in total

1.  Third Annual Fecal Occult Blood Testing in Community Health Clinics.

Authors:  Connie L Arnold; Alfred Rademaker; Michael S Wolf; Dachao Liu; Jill Hancock; Terry C Davis
Journal:  Am J Health Behav       Date:  2016-05

2.  Impact of continued mailed fecal tests in the patient-centered medical home: Year 3 of the Systems of Support to Increase Colon Cancer Screening and Follow-Up randomized trial.

Authors:  Beverly B Green; Melissa L Anderson; Jessica Chubak; Sharon Fuller; Richard T Meenan; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2015-10-21       Impact factor: 6.860

3.  Changes in Colorectal Cancer Screening Knowledge, Behavior, Beliefs, Self-Efficacy, and Barriers among Community Health Clinic Patients after a Health Literacy Intervention.

Authors:  Connie L Arnold; Alfred Rademaker; Dachao Liu; Terry C Davis
Journal:  J Community Med Health Educ       Date:  2017-01-13

4.  A centralized mailed program with stepped increases of support increases time in compliance with colorectal cancer screening guidelines over 5 years: A randomized trial.

Authors:  Beverly B Green; Melissa L Anderson; Andrea J Cook; Jessica Chubak; Sharon Fuller; Richard T Meenan; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  2017-07-28       Impact factor: 6.860

5.  A Systematic Review of Repeat Fecal Occult Blood Tests for Colorectal Cancer Screening.

Authors:  Caitlin C Murphy; Ahana Sen; Bianca Watson; Samir Gupta; Helen Mayo; Amit G Singal
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2019-11-18       Impact factor: 4.254

6.  Final Results of a 3-Year Literacy-Informed Intervention to Promote Annual Fecal Occult Blood Test Screening.

Authors:  Connie L Arnold; Alfred Rademaker; Michael S Wolf; Dachao Liu; Geoffrey Lucas; Jill Hancock; Terry C Davis
Journal:  J Community Health       Date:  2016-08

7.  Predictors of repeat participation in the NHS bowel cancer screening programme.

Authors:  S H Lo; S Halloran; J Snowball; H Seaman; J Wardle; C von Wagner
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2014-11-27       Impact factor: 7.640

8.  Behavioural and demographic predictors of adherence to three consecutive faecal occult blood test screening opportunities: a population study.

Authors:  Amy Duncan; Deborah Turnbull; Carlene Wilson; Joanne M Osborne; Stephen R Cole; Ingrid Flight; Graeme P Young
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2014-03-07       Impact factor: 3.295

9.  A Centralized Program with Stepped Support Increases Adherence to Colorectal Cancer Screening Over 9 Years: a Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Beverly B Green; Melissa L Anderson; Andrea J Cook; Jessica Chubak; Sharon Fuller; Richard T Meenan; Sally W Vernon
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 6.473

10.  Colorectal cancer screening uptake over three biennial invitation rounds in the English bowel cancer screening programme.

Authors:  Siu Hing Lo; Stephen Halloran; Julia Snowball; Helen Seaman; Jane Wardle; Christian von Wagner
Journal:  Gut       Date:  2014-05-07       Impact factor: 23.059

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.