Literature DB >> 24033888

Three-dimensional evaluation of upper airway in patients with different anteroposterior skeletal patterns.

Z H Zheng1, T Yamaguchi, A Kurihara, H F Li, K Maki.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To investigate variability in the upper airway of subjects with different anteroposterior skeletal patterns by evaluating the volume and the most constricted cross-sectional area of the pharyngeal airway and defining correlations between the different variables.
MATERIAL AND METHODS: The study sample consisted of 60 patients (29 boys, 31 girls) divided into three groups: Class I (1 ≤ ANB ≤ 3), Class II (ANB>3), and Class III (ANB<1), to evaluate how the jaw relationship affects the airway volume and the most constricted cross-sectional area (Min-CSA). Differences between groups were determined using the Tukey-Kramer test. Correlations between variables were tested using Pearson's correlation coefficient.
RESULTS: The volume and the Min-CSA of the pharyngeal airway (PA) were significantly related to anteroposterior skeletal patterns (p < 0.05). The nasopharyngeal airway (NA) volume of Class I and Class III subjects was significantly larger than that of Class II subjects (p < 0.05). The Min-CSA and the length of PA were significantly related to the volume of PA (p < 0.05). The site and the size of the Min-CSA varied among the three groups.
CONCLUSIONS: The volume and the most constricted cross-sectional area of the airway varied with different anteroposterior skeletal patterns. The NA volume of Class I and Class III subjects was significantly larger than that of patients with a Class II skeletal pattern.
© 2013 John Wiley & Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cephalometry; cone-beam CT; measurement; tomography; upper airway

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24033888     DOI: 10.1111/ocr.12029

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Orthod Craniofac Res        ISSN: 1601-6335            Impact factor:   1.826


  8 in total

1.  Cone-beam evaluation of pharyngeal airway space in adult skeletal Class II patients with different condylar positions.

Authors:  Jintao Xu; Ruonan Sun; Linna Wang; Xiaoying Hu
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2018-11-20       Impact factor: 2.079

2.  Assessment of pharyngeal airway volume in adolescent patients affected by bilateral cleft lip and palate using cone beam computed tomography.

Authors:  Mevlut Celikoglu; Faruk I Ucar; Ahmet E Sekerci; Suleyman K Buyuk; Mustafa Ersoz; Yildiray Sisman
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-03-25       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Effect of extraction treatment on upper airway dimensions in patients with bimaxillary skeletal protrusion relative to their vertical skeletal pattern.

Authors:  Ha-Nul Cho; Hyun Joo Yoon; Jae Hyun Park; Young-Guk Park; Su-Jung Kim
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2021-05-25       Impact factor: 1.372

4.  Effects of bodily retraction of mandibular incisors versus mandibular setback surgery on pharyngeal airway space: A comparative study.

Authors:  Byeong-Tak Keum; Sung-Hwan Choi; Yoon Jeong Choi; Hyoung-Seon Baik; Kee-Joon Lee
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2017-09-29       Impact factor: 1.372

5.  Assessment of pharyngeal airway in Korean adolescents according to skeletal pattern, sex, and cervical vertebral maturation: A cross-sectional CBCT study.

Authors:  Tassneem Elagib; Hee-Moon Kyung; Bui Quang Hung; Mihee Hong
Journal:  Korean J Orthod       Date:  2022-05-16       Impact factor: 1.361

6.  Comparison of pharyngeal airway volume among different vertical skeletal patterns: a cone-beam computed tomography study.

Authors:  Mevlut Celikoglu; Mehmet Bayram; Ahmet E Sekerci; Suleyman K Buyuk; Ebubekir Toy
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 2.079

7.  Three-dimensional craniofacial characteristics associated with obstructive sleep apnea severity and treatment outcomes.

Authors:  Marcela Gurgel; Lucia Cevidanes; Rowdley Pereira; Fabio Costa; Antonio Ruellas; Jonas Bianchi; Paulo Cunali; Lia Bittencourt; Cauby Chaves Junior
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2021-07-17       Impact factor: 3.573

8.  Do the dimensions of the hard palate have a relationship with the volumes of the upper airways and maxillary sinuses? A CBCT study.

Authors:  Murilo Miranda-Viana; Deborah Queiroz Freitas; Alessiana Helena Machado; Amanda Farias Gomes; Yuri Nejaim
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-07-20       Impact factor: 2.757

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.