Literature DB >> 24033805

The chicken-wing morphology: an anatomical challenge for left atrial appendage occlusion.

Xavier Freixa1, Apostolos Tzikas, Arsène Basmadjian, Patrick Garceau, Rèda Ibrahim.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To describe the particular assessment and closure strategy that was followed in patients with left atrial appendages (LAA) with an early and severe bend.
BACKGROUND: The presence of a chicken-wing morphology with an early and severe bend constitutes one of the most difficult anatomical settings for transcatheter LAA occlusion.
METHODS: Between November 2009 and December 2012, patients who presented chicken-wing LAA with an early (<20 mm from the ostium) and severe bend (<180°) were identified and included in the analysis. A particular implanting strategy consisting of deploying the distal lobe of the device inside the chicken-wing bend was used in all cases.
RESULTS: Among 42 patients who underwent LAA occlusion during the study period, 5 (12%) presented the pre-specified anatomy. Following the mentioned implanting strategy, all patients underwent successful LAA occlusion using the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug (n = 2) and the Amplatzer Amulet (n = 3). Successful occlusion was achieved in all patients. None of them presented any procedural complication. Follow-up transesophageal echocardiography at 3 months showed successful LAA sealing in all patients and no device embolization or thrombosis.
CONCLUSIONS: According to our results, the pre-specified closing implantation technique for chicken-wing LAAs with an early and severe bend might be a valid strategy for this challenging anatomical setting. Further cases will be necessary to confirm the results.
© 2013, Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24033805     DOI: 10.1111/joic.12055

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Interv Cardiol        ISSN: 0896-4327            Impact factor:   2.279


  9 in total

Review 1.  Transseptal Puncture: Devices, Techniques, and Considerations for Specific Interventions.

Authors:  Sharan Prakash Sharma; Rahul Nalamasu; Rakesh Gopinathannair; Chandrasekhar Vasamreddy; Dhanunjaya Lakkireddy
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 2.931

2.  Procedural success and intra-hospital outcome related to left atrial appendage morphology in patients that receive an interventional left atrial appendage closure.

Authors:  Christian Fastner; Michael Behnes; Benjamin Sartorius; Annika Wenke; Ibrahim El-Battrawy; Uzair Ansari; Ishar-Singh Gill; Martin Borggrefe; Ibrahim Akin
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2017-04-13       Impact factor: 2.882

Review 3.  Left Atrial Appendage Ligation And Exclusion Technology In The Incubator.

Authors:  Faisal F Syed; Amit Noheria; Christopher V DeSimone; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-08-31

Review 4.  A Review Of The Relevant Embryology, Pathohistology, And Anatomy Of The Left Atrial Appendage For The Invasive Cardiac Electrophysiologist.

Authors:  Christopher V DeSimone; Bs Gaba Prakriti; Jason Tri; Faisal Syed; Amit Noheria Sm; Samuel J Asirvatham
Journal:  J Atr Fibrillation       Date:  2015-08-31

5.  Percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation: an update.

Authors:  O De Backer; S Arnous; N Ihlemann; N Vejlstrup; E Jørgensen; S Pehrson; T D W Krieger; P Meier; L Søndergaard; O W Franzen
Journal:  Open Heart       Date:  2014-06-06

6.  Clinical outcomes of patients undergoing percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion in general anaesthesia or conscious sedation: data from the prospective global Amplatzer Amulet Occluder Observational Study.

Authors:  Kerstin Piayda; Katharina Hellhammer; Jens Erik Nielsen-Kudsk; Boris Schmidt; Patrizio Mazzone; Sergio Berti; Sven Fischer; Juha Lund; Matteo Montorfano; Paolo Della Bella; Ryan Gage; Tobias Zeus
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Impact of operatoŕs experience on peri-procedural outcomes with Watchman FLX: Insights from the FLX-SPA registry.

Authors:  Ignacio Cruz-González; Francisco Torres Saura; Blanca Trejo-Velasco; José Antonio Fernández Díaz; Ricardo Fajardo Molina; Raquel Del Valle-Fernández; Gerardo Moreno Terribas; David Martí Sánchez; José-Ramón López-Mínguez; Ivan Gomez-Blazquez; Juan-Carlos Sanmartin Pena; Javier Botas; Pedro Martin Lorenzo; Jorge Palazuelos; Ramón Albarrán Rincon; Mohsen Mohandes; Felipe-Jose Rodriguez Entem; Gerard Martí; Ernesto Valero; Hipólito Gutiérrez; Ignacio J Amat-Santos; Luis Nombela-Franco; Pablo Salinas; Luis Teruel; Joan-Antoni Gomez-Hospital; Dabit Arzamendi; Mario Torres Sanabria; Germán Calle Pérez; Dolores Cañadas Pruaño; Armando Pérez de Prado; Tomás Benito González; Eduardo Arroyo-Úcar; Rodrigo Estévez-Loureiro; Berenice Caneiro-Queija; Jose L Ibañez Criado; Juan M Ruiz-Nodar
Journal:  Int J Cardiol Heart Vasc       Date:  2021-12-29

8.  Left atrial appendage morphology, echocardiographic characterization, procedural data and in-hospital outcome of patients receiving left atrial appendage occlusion device implantation: a prospective observational study.

Authors:  Christian Fastner; Michael Behnes; Benjamin Sartorius; Mustafa Yildiz; Kambis Mashayekhi; Ibrahim El-Battrawy; Ralf Lehmann; Stefan Baumann; Tobias Becher; Martin Borggrefe; Ibrahim Akin
Journal:  BMC Cardiovasc Disord       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 2.298

9.  Applications designed to successfully implant in challenging left atrial appendage occlusion cases: a new tool for the interventional cardiologist.

Authors:  José Ramón López-Mínguez; Ginés Martínez-Cáceres; Reyes González-Fernández; Juan Manuel Nogales-Asensio; Victoria Millán-Núñez
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2021-05-06       Impact factor: 2.357

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.