Literature DB >> 24033564

The effect of flow rate and agitation technique on irrigant extrusion ex vivo.

C Boutsioukis1, Z Psimma, E Kastrinakis.   

Abstract

AIM: To evaluate (i) the effect of irrigant flow rate, needle type, needle insertion depth and apical constriction diameter and (ii) the effect of ultrasonic, sonic and manual dynamic agitation on irrigant extrusion using a recently introduced method.
METHODOLOGY: Thirty-two human teeth with a straight root canal were prepared to size 35, 0.06 taper and assigned to group A or B. The apical constriction diameter was 0.15-0.25 mm. Specimens were mounted on a plastic vial filled with distilled water to simulate a periapical lesion. A point-conductivity probe was used to determine the volume of irrigant extruded into the vial. Within group A, NaOCl was delivered at 0.14 or 0.26 mL s(-1) by an open-ended or a closed-ended needle at 1 or 3 mm short of working length (WL). In group B, NaOCl was agitated at high or low power either by an ultrasonically or sonically oscillating instrument inserted at 1 or 3 mm short of WL or by manual push-pull strokes of a gutta-percha cone. Results were analysed by repeated-measures anovas, at 0.05 significance.
RESULTS: An increase in the flow rate resulted in increased extrusion (P < 0.001). The open-ended needle extruded significantly more irrigant than the closed-ended (P < 0.001). Extrusion decreased as needles moved away from WL (P < 0.001). The effect of apical constriction diameter was not significant (P > 0.454). Manual dynamic agitation extruded significantly more irrigant than sonic and ultrasonic agitation (P < 0.001).
CONCLUSIONS: Irrigant flow rate, needle type and insertion depth and agitation technique had a significant effect on extrusion.
© 2013 International Endodontic Journal. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  agitation; apical extrusion; conductivity probe; flow rate; irrigation; sodium hypochlorite

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24033564     DOI: 10.1111/iej.12176

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Endod J        ISSN: 0143-2885            Impact factor:   5.264


  14 in total

1.  A comparison between two negative pressure irrigation techniques in simulated immature tooth: an ex vivo study.

Authors:  Ahmed Jamleh; Yasue Fukumoto; Yoshioka Takatomo; Chihiro Kobayashi; Hideaki Suda; Carlos G Adorno
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2015-05-13       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Comparison of apical irrigant solution extrusion among conventional and laser-activated endodontic irrigation.

Authors:  Jelena Vidas; Damir Snjaric; Alen Braut; Zoran Carija; Romana Persic Bukmir; Roeland J G De Moor; Ivana Brekalo Prso
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2019-07-18       Impact factor: 3.161

3.  Effect of PIPS technique at different power settings on irrigating solution extrusion.

Authors:  Hakan Arslan; Merve Akcay; Hüseyin Ertas; Ismail Davut Capar; Gökhan Saygili; Merve Meşe
Journal:  Lasers Med Sci       Date:  2014-07-19       Impact factor: 3.161

4.  Comparison of sodium hypochlorite extrusion by five irrigation systems using an artificial root socket model and a quantitative chemical method.

Authors:  Adham A Azim; Hacer Aksel; M Margaret Jefferson; George T-J Huang
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2017-07-26       Impact factor: 3.573

5.  Postoperative pain after SWEEPS, PIPS, sonic and ultrasonic-assisted irrigation activation techniques: a randomized clinical trial.

Authors:  Erhan Erkan; Mustafa Gündoğar; Gülşah Uslu; Taha Özyürek
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2022-03-10       Impact factor: 2.885

6.  Effectiveness of XP-Endo Finisher and passive ultrasonic irrigation on intracanal medicament removal from root canals: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jiani Zhou; Tingjun Liu; Lihong Guo
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 2.757

7.  Apical extrusion of sodium hypochlorite activated with two laser systems and ultrasonics: a spectrophotometric analysis.

Authors:  Bağdagül Helvacıoğlu Kıvanç; Hacer Deniz Arısu; Nazlı Özge Yanar; Hülya Mercan Silah; Recai İnam; Güliz Görgül
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2015-06-26       Impact factor: 2.757

8.  Comparative evaluation of the amount of debris extruded apically using conventional syringe, passive ultrasonic irrigation and EndoIrrigator Plus system: An in vitro study.

Authors:  Vidhi Prabhakar Shetty; Balaram Damodar Naik; Amit Kashinath Pachlag; Mahantesh Mrityunjay Yeli
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2017 Nov-Dec

Review 9.  Endodontic and clinical considerations in the management of variable anatomy in mandibular premolars: a literature review.

Authors:  Denzil Albuquerque; Jojo Kottoor; Mohammad Hammo
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 10.  Preparation Prerequisites for Effective Irrigation of Apical Root Canal: A Critical Review.

Authors:  Dimitrios Tziafas; Dana Alraeesi; Reem Al Hormoodi; Maamoun Ataya; Hessa Fezai; Nausheen Aga
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2017-10-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.