Literature DB >> 24033182

Epistatic interactions determine the mutational pathways and coexistence of lineages in clonal Escherichia coli populations.

Ram Prasad Maharjan1, Thomas Ferenci.   

Abstract

Understanding how diversity emerges in a single niche is not fully understood. Rugged fitness landscapes and epistasis between beneficial mutations could explain coexistence among emerging lineages. To provide an experimental test of this notion, we investigated epistasis among four pleiotropic mutations in rpoS, mglD, malT, and hfq present in two coexisting lineages that repeatedly fixed in experimental populations of Escherichia coli. The mutations were transferred into the ancestral background individually or in combination of double or triple alleles. The combined competitive fitness of two or three beneficial mutations from the same lineage was consistently lower than the sum of the competitive fitness of single mutants--a clear indication of negative epistasis within lineages. We also found sign epistasis (i.e., the combined fitness of two beneficial mutations lower than the ancestor), not only from two different lineages (i.e., hfq and rpoS) but also from the same lineage (i.e., mglD and malT). The sign epistasis between loci of different lineages indeed indicated a rugged fitness landscape, providing an epistatic explanation for the coexistence of distinct rpoS and hfq lineages in evolving populations. The negative and sign epistasis between beneficial mutations within the same lineage can further explain the order of mutation acquisition.
© 2013 The Author(s). Evolution © 2013 The Society for the Study of Evolution.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beneficial mutations; chemostat; experimental evolution; genetic interactions; negative epistasis; sign epistasis

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24033182     DOI: 10.1111/evo.12137

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Evolution        ISSN: 0014-3820            Impact factor:   3.694


  13 in total

1.  Bypass of genetic constraints during mutator evolution to antibiotic resistance.

Authors:  Alejandro Couce; Alexandro Rodríguez-Rojas; Jesús Blázquez
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 5.349

Review 2.  Experimental Design, Population Dynamics, and Diversity in Microbial Experimental Evolution.

Authors:  Bram Van den Bergh; Toon Swings; Maarten Fauvart; Jan Michiels
Journal:  Microbiol Mol Biol Rev       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 11.056

3.  Contribution of silent mutations to thermal adaptation of RNA bacteriophage Qβ.

Authors:  Akiko Kashiwagi; Ryu Sugawara; Fumie Sano Tsushima; Tomofumi Kumagai; Tetsuya Yomo
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2014-07-23       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Inferring fitness landscapes by regression produces biased estimates of epistasis.

Authors:  Jakub Otwinowski; Joshua B Plotkin
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-05-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 5.  The functional basis of adaptive evolution in chemostats.

Authors:  David Gresham; Jungeui Hong
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Rev       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 16.408

6.  Simple phenotypic sweeps hide complex genetic changes in populations.

Authors:  Ram P Maharjan; Bin Liu; Lu Feng; Thomas Ferenci; Lei Wang
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2015-01-13       Impact factor: 3.416

Review 7.  Elucidating the molecular architecture of adaptation via evolve and resequence experiments.

Authors:  Anthony Long; Gianni Liti; Andrej Luptak; Olivier Tenaillon
Journal:  Nat Rev Genet       Date:  2015-09-08       Impact factor: 53.242

8.  Mapping the fitness landscape of gene expression uncovers the cause of antagonism and sign epistasis between adaptive mutations.

Authors:  Hsin-Hung Chou; Nigel F Delaney; Jeremy A Draghi; Christopher J Marx
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-02-27       Impact factor: 5.917

9.  Ex uno plures: clonal reinforcement drives evolution of a simple microbial community.

Authors:  Margie Kinnersley; Jared Wenger; Evgueny Kroll; Julian Adams; Gavin Sherlock; Frank Rosenzweig
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-06-26       Impact factor: 5.917

10.  The Context-Dependence of Mutations: A Linkage of Formalisms.

Authors:  Frank J Poelwijk; Vinod Krishna; Rama Ranganathan
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-06-23       Impact factor: 4.475

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.