Literature DB >> 24032641

Deep brain stimulation of the centromedian thalamic nucleus for the treatment of generalized and frontal epilepsies.

Antonio Valentín1, Eduardo García Navarrete, Ramesh Chelvarajah, Cristina Torres, Marta Navas, Lelia Vico, Nerea Torres, Jesus Pastor, Richard Selway, Rafael G Sola, Gonzalo Alarcon.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the thalamus is an emerging surgical option for people with medically refractory epilepsy that is not suitable for resective surgery, or in whom surgery has failed. Our main aim was to evaluate the efficacy of bilateral centromedian thalamic nucleus (CMN) DBS for seizure control in generalized epilepsy and frontal lobe epilepsy with a two-center, single-blind, controlled trial.
METHODS: Participants were adults with refractory generalized or frontal lobe epilepsy. Seizure diaries were kept by patients/carers prospectively from enrollment. The baseline preimplantation period was followed by a control period consisting of a blind stimulation-OFF phase of at least 3 months, a 3-month blind stimulation-ON phase, and a 6-month unblinded stimulation-ON phase. The control period was followed by an unblinded long-term extension phase with stimulation-ON in those patients in whom stimulation was thought to be effective. KEY
FINDINGS: Eleven patients were recruited at King's College Hospital (London, United Kingdom United Kingdom) and at University Hospital La Princesa (Madrid, Spain). Among the five patients with frontal lobe epilepsy, only one patient had >50% improvement in seizure frequency during the blind period. In the long-term extension phase, two patients with frontal lobe epilepsy had >50% improvement in seizure frequency. All six patients with generalized epilepsy had >50% improvement in seizure frequency during the blind period. In the long-term extension phase, five of the six patients showed >50% improvement in the frequency of major seizures (one became seizure free, one had >99% improvement, and three had 60-95% reduction in seizure frequency). Among patients with generalized epilepsy, the DBS implantation itself appears to be effective, as two patients remained seizure free during 12 and 50 months with DBS OFF, and the remaining four had 50-91% improvement in the initial 3 months with DBS OFF. SIGNIFICANCE: DBS implantation and stimulation of the CMN appears to be a safe and efficacious treatment, particularly in patients with refractory generalized epilepsy. CMN stimulation was not as effective in frontal lobe epilepsy, which requires further studies. DBS of the CMN should be considered as a treatment option, particularly in patients with refractory generalized epilepsy syndromes. Wiley Periodicals, Inc.
© 2013 International League Against Epilepsy.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Centromedian; Deep brain stimulation; Epilepsy; Epilepsy surgery; Seizure; Thalamus

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24032641     DOI: 10.1111/epi.12352

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epilepsia        ISSN: 0013-9580            Impact factor:   5.864


  58 in total

Review 1.  Deep brain and cortical stimulation for epilepsy.

Authors:  Mathieu Sprengers; Kristl Vonck; Evelien Carrette; Anthony G Marson; Paul Boon
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2017-07-18

Review 2.  Intractable Generalized Epilepsy: Therapeutic Approaches.

Authors:  Sean T Hwang; Scott J Stevens; Aradia X Fu; Simona V Proteasa
Journal:  Curr Neurol Neurosci Rep       Date:  2019-02-26       Impact factor: 5.081

Review 3.  Deep brain stimulation for the treatment of epilepsy: circuits, targets, and trials.

Authors:  Nealen G Laxpati; Willard S Kasoff; Robert E Gross
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.620

4.  Resting-state networks link invasive and noninvasive brain stimulation across diverse psychiatric and neurological diseases.

Authors:  Michael D Fox; Randy L Buckner; Hesheng Liu; M Mallar Chakravarty; Andres M Lozano; Alvaro Pascual-Leone
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-29       Impact factor: 11.205

5.  Treating refractory generalized epilepsy with stimulation.

Authors:  Lara E Jehi
Journal:  Epilepsy Curr       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 7.500

6.  Chemogenetic silencing of the midline and intralaminar thalamus blocks amygdala-kindled seizures.

Authors:  Evan Wicker; Patrick A Forcelli
Journal:  Exp Neurol       Date:  2016-07-09       Impact factor: 5.330

7.  Dynamics of sensorimotor cortex activation during absence and myoclonic seizures in a mouse model of juvenile myoclonic epilepsy.

Authors:  Li Ding; Martin J Gallagher
Journal:  Epilepsia       Date:  2016-08-30       Impact factor: 5.864

8.  The Child & Youth CompreHensIve Longitudinal Database for Deep Brain Stimulation (CHILD-DBS).

Authors:  Han Yan; Lauren Siegel; Sara Breitbart; Carolina Gorodetsky; Hernan D Gonorazky; Ivanna Yau; Cristina Go; Elizabeth Donner; Suneil K Kalia; Alfonso Fasano; Alexander G Weil; Aria Fallah; George M Ibrahim
Journal:  Childs Nerv Syst       Date:  2020-09-15       Impact factor: 1.475

Review 9.  Optogenetic Approaches for Controlling Seizure Activity.

Authors:  Jack K Tung; Ken Berglund; Robert E Gross
Journal:  Brain Stimul       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 8.955

Review 10.  Physiology-Based Treatment of Myoclonus.

Authors:  Ashley B Pena; John N Caviness
Journal:  Neurotherapeutics       Date:  2020-10       Impact factor: 7.620

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.