Literature DB >> 24032370

Prostate histoscanning in clinically localized biopsy proven prostate cancer: an accuracy study.

Petr Macek1, Eric Barret, Rafael Sanchez-Salas, Marc Galiano, Francois Rozet, Youness Ahallal, Joseph M Gaya, Matthieu Durant, Laurent Mascle, Camilo Giedelman, Luca Lunelli, Pierre Validire, Marcel Nesvadba, Xavier Cathelineau.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of prostate histoscanning (PHS) for spatial detection and localization of prostate cancer (PCa). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Prospective, single center study from January to September 2012 was conducted. Inclusion criterion was biopsy confirmed PCa in patients scheduled for radical prostatectomy. In total, 98 patients were included in the study. Results of PHS were compared against whole-mount step sectioning by the Stanford technique. A lower limit of 0.1 cm(3) was used for PHS. A dedicated 12-sector form was used for spatial correlation. The urologist and pathologist were blinded for each other's results. Sensitivity, specificity, and receiver operating characteristic curves were calculated with a logistic regression model for covariates.
RESULTS: PHS performance for detection of PCa lesions ≥0.1 cm(3) had sensitivity of 60%, specificity of 66%, and area under the curve (AUC) of 0.63. Posterior and anterior sectors achieved sensitivity of 77%, specificity of 39%, and 28% and 84%, respectively. The model containing PHS positivity within a given sector reached sensitivity of 73.4%, specificity of 65.7%, and AUC of 0.75. In a ogistic regression model, the performance of PHS was affected by sector location, rectal distance, index, and total cancer volume (all P<0.0001) and bladder fullness (P=0.02). The best PHS accuracy was present in midposterior sectors.
CONCLUSIONS: PHS has a potential for clinical practice, especially if PHS positivity within given sectors is taken into account. A trained operator is important. More studies are necessary to test different detection limits in various clinical settings, such as targeted biopsies and image guided focal therapy.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 24032370     DOI: 10.1089/end.2013.0419

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Endourol        ISSN: 0892-7790            Impact factor:   2.942


  9 in total

1.  True targeting-derived prostate biopsy: HistoScanning™ remained inadequate despite advanced technical efforts.

Authors:  Jonas Schiffmann; Gisa Mehring; Pierre Tennstedt; Lukas Manka; Katharina Boehm; Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Peter Hammerer; Markus Graefen; Georg Salomon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 4.226

2.  Prostate histoscanning true targeting guided prostate biopsy: initial clinical experience.

Authors:  Arjun Sivaraman; Rafael Sanchez-Salas; Eric Barret; Petr Macek; Pierre Validire; Marc Galiano; Francois Rozet; Xavier Cathelineau
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 3.  [Sonographic imaging of the prostate].

Authors:  B Schlenker; D A Clevert; G Salomon
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 0.639

Review 4.  HistoScanningTM to Detect and Characterize Prostate Cancer-a Review of Existing Literature.

Authors:  James S Wysock; Alex Xu; Clement Orczyk; Samir S Taneja
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2017-10-24       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 5.  Controversial evidence for the use of HistoScanning™ in the detection of prostate cancer.

Authors:  Jonas Schiffmann; Lukas Manka; Katharina Boehm; Sami-Ramzi Leyh-Bannurah; Pierre I Karakiewicz; Markus Graefen; Peter Hammerer; Georg Salomon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2015-04-10       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 6.  Application of Multiple Ultrasonic Techniques in the Diagnosis of Prostate Cancer.

Authors:  Yushan Liu; Shi Zeng; Ran Xu
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-06-27       Impact factor: 5.738

7.  Does HistoScanning™ predict positive results in prostate biopsy? A retrospective analysis of 1,188 sextants of the prostate.

Authors:  J Schiffmann; P Tennstedt; J Fischer; Zhe Tian; B Beyer; K Boehm; M Sun; G Gandaglia; U Michl; M Graefen; G Salomon
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2014-05-29       Impact factor: 4.226

8.  A systematic review and meta-analysis of Histoscanning™ in prostate cancer diagnostics.

Authors:  Andrey Morozov; Vasiliy Kozlov; Juan Gomez Rivas; Jeremy Yuen-Chun Teoh; Evgeniy Bezrukov; Alexander Amosov; Eric Barret; Mark Taratkin; Georg Salomon; Thomas R W Herrmann; Ali Gozen; Dmitry Enikeev
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-04-07       Impact factor: 4.226

Review 9.  A Review of Imaging Methods for Prostate Cancer Detection.

Authors:  Saradwata Sarkar; Sudipta Das
Journal:  Biomed Eng Comput Biol       Date:  2016-03-02
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.