| Literature DB >> 24031990 |
Adriana O Medeiros1, Beatriz S Missagia, Luciana R Brandão, Marcos Callisto, Francisco A R Barbosa, Carlos A Rosa.
Abstract
Yeast communities were assessed in 14 rivers and four lakes from the Doce River basin in Brazil, during the rainy and dry seasons of the years 2000 and 2001. Water samples were collected at the subsurface in all sites. The following physical and chemical parameters were measured: temperature, dissolved oxygen, pH, electrical conductivity, total phosphorus, ortho-phosphate, ammonium, nitrate, nitrite and total nitrogen and the counts of faecal coliforms and heterotrophic bacteria were carried out to characterize the aquatic environmental sampled. The yeast counts were higher in aquatic environments with the highest counts of coliform and heterotrophic bacteria. These environments receive a high influx of domestic and industrial waste. A total of 317 isolates identified in forty eight yeast species were recorded in the sites sampled and the specie Aureobasidium pullulans were found in eleven out of eighteen sites sampled and some opportunistic pathogens such as the yeast species Candida krusei were isolated only in the polluted rivers with a positive correlation with the biotic and abiotic parameters that indicate sewage contamination.Entities:
Keywords: tropical freshwater; yeast diversity and water quality
Year: 2012 PMID: 24031990 PMCID: PMC3769007 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-838220120004000043
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Figure 1Location of the sampling stations (1-PEI1; 2-PEI2; 3-PER; 4 – SBR and CA; 5- PIR; 6- IPR; 7-SER; 8- DOL and CAL; 9-DOR; 10-ACL; 11-AML; 12-IND1, IND 2, IND 3 AND IND 4) in the middle Rio Doce basin, Minas Gerais State-Brazil
Most probable number of total and faecal coliforms in the sites sampled during the rainy and dry seasons of 2000 and 2001.
| site | Site | Total coliforms (NMP100 mL-1) | Fecal coliform (NMP100 mL-1) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| year | 2000 | 2001 | 2000 | 2001 | |
| rainy | IND1 | 40 | 33 | <2 | 33 |
| IND2 | 110 | 50 | 20 | 2 | |
| IND3 | 170 | 21 | 40 | 2 | |
| IND4 | 170 | 220 | 20 | 2 | |
| IND5 | 140 | 220 | <2 | 80 | |
| PEI1 | 2800 | 240 | 500 | 26 | |
| PEI2 | 2200 | 240 | 700 | 50 | |
| CAR | 2 | <2 | 2 | <2 | |
| SBR | 28000 | 200 | 22000 | 200 | |
| PER | 50000 | 800 | 30000 | 170 | |
| SER | 160000 | 160000 | 160000 | 160000 | |
| PIR | 160000 | 1600000 | 50000 | 3400 | |
| IPR | 160000 | 1600000 | 160000 | 1600000 | |
| DOR | 30000 | 24000 | 30000 | 800 | |
| DOL | 500 | 7 | 20 | <2 | |
| AML | 140 | 60 | 14 | <2 | |
| ACL | 90 | 4 | 19 | <2 | |
| CAL | ND | 8 | ND | 4 | |
| DRY | IND1 | 19 | 90 | <2 | 11 |
| IND2 | 19 | 23 | <2 | 4 | |
| IND3 | 40 | 14 | <2 | 4 | |
| IND4 | 40 | 24 | <2 | 4 | |
| IND5 | 40 | 280 | 20 | 80 | |
| PEI1 | 110 | 900 | 80 | 220 | |
| PEI2 | 110 | 500 | 80 | 280 | |
| CAR | <2 | 400 | <2 | 200 | |
| SBR | 22000 | 200 | 2000 | <2 | |
| PER | 7000 | 7000 | 2000 | 1100 | |
| SER | 8000 | 200 | 7000 | <2 | |
| PIR | 160000 | 160000 | 9000 | 9000 | |
| IPR | 160000 | 160000 | 35000 | 160000 | |
| DOR | 30000 | 3400 | 22000 | 3400 | |
| DOL | 110 | 1600 | 90 | <2 | |
| AML | 90 | 80 | 60 | 7 | |
| ACL | 340 | 6 | 330 | <2 | |
| CAL | ND | 4 | ND | 4 |
Figure 2Counts of heterotrophic bacteria (A) and yeasts (B) in the sampled sites in Serra do Cipó during the rainy and dry seasons of 2000 and 2001 (mean ± SE, n=3). Abbreviations are described in the text.
Figure 3Counts of heterotrophic bacteria □ and yeasts ■, during the rainy and dry seasons of 2000 and 2001 (means ± SE, n=3) in the sample sites in the middle of the Doce River basin.
The density of yeast species (cfu ml-1) sampled in the rainy and dry seasons of 2000 and 2001. (mean ± SE, n=3).
| Sites | yeast species | period of samples | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rainy (2000) | Dry (2000) Rainy (2001) | Rainy (2001) | Dry (2001) | ||
| IND1 | 3.3 | ||||
| 33.3 | |||||
| IND2 | 10.3 | ||||
| IND3 | 23.3 | ||||
| 3.3 | |||||
| IND4 | 10 | ||||
| 85 | |||||
| 5 | |||||
| 20 | |||||
| 25 | 15 | ||||
| 3.3 | |||||
| 3.3 | |||||
| IND5 | 3.3 | ||||
| 5 | |||||
| PEI1 | 3.3 | 3.3 | |||
| 70 | |||||
| 3.3 | |||||
| 153 | |||||
| 3.3 | |||||
| PEI2 | 6.6 | 13.3 | 3.3 | 6.6 | |
| 3.3 | |||||
| 350 | |||||
| 6.6 | |||||
| 13.3 | |||||
| 6.6 | |||||
| 10 | |||||
| 6.6 | |||||
| SBR | 10 | ||||
| PER | 3.3 | ||||
| 3.3 | |||||
| 20 | |||||
| SER | 10 | ||||
| 3.3 | |||||
| 20 | |||||
| 3.3 | |||||
| 16 | |||||
| 6.6 | 10 | ||||
| 100 | |||||
| 26 | |||||
| 3.3 | |||||
| 6.6 | |||||
| PIR | 3.3 | ||||
| 3.3 | |||||
| 3.3 | |||||
| 90 | |||||
| 20 | |||||
| 277 | |||||
| 153 | |||||
| 13 | |||||
| 3.3 | 6.6 | ||||
| 6.6 | |||||
| 3.3 | |||||
| IPR | 10 | ||||
| 10 | 3.3 | ||||
| 66 | |||||
| 161 | |||||
| 3.3 | |||||
| 3.3 | |||||
| 6.6 | |||||
| 3.3 | |||||
| 6.6 | |||||
| 3.3 | |||||
| 23.3 | |||||
| 6.6 | |||||
| 3.3 | 33.3 | ||||
| 3.3 | 3.3 | ||||
| 3.3 | |||||
| 26.6 | |||||
| 3.3 | |||||
| 10 | |||||
| 13.3 | |||||
| 3.3 | |||||
| DOR | 6.6 | ||||
| 6.6 | |||||
| 6.6 | |||||
| 5 | |||||
| DOL | 5 | ||||
| AML | 6.6 | ||||
| 3.3 | |||||
| ACL | 6.6 | ||||
| 12 | |||||
| 3.3 | |||||
| 5 | |||||
| 6.6 | 5 | ||||
| 300 | |||||
| 6.6 | |||||
| 190 | |||||
| 3.3 | |||||
| CAL | 230 | ||||
| 13 | |||||
| 36 | |||||
Yeast isolates with their identity confirmed by sequencing of the D1/D2 variable domains of the large subunit DNA.
Figure 4Correlation of biotic and abiotic parameters with the two axes of Canonical Correspondence Analyses (CCA). TEMP = temperature, condut=conductivity, OD= dissolved oxygen, P-total = total phosphorus, PO4 – orthophosphate, N- tot = total nitrogen, NH4 = nitrate, NO3 = nitrite, AP = Aureobasidium pullulans, Cb1= Candida blankei, Cb2= Candida blankei-similar, Cc= Candida catenulata, Cn= Candida entomophila-like, Ct= Candida ethanolica, Cg= Candida glabrata-like, Cu= Candida guilliermondii, Ck= Candida krusei, Cm= Candida melibiosica, Cp= Candida palmioleophila, Cr=Candida parapsilosis, Cs= Candida pararugosa, Cr= Candida rugosa, C1= Candida sp1, C2= Candida sp2, Cra= Cryptococcus albidus, Crh= Cryptococcus huimpi-like, Cru= Cryptococcus hungaricus, Crl= Cryptococcus laurentii, Crs= Cryptococcus luteolus, Crm= Cryptococcus magnus, Cr1= Cryptococcus sp., Dh=Debaryomyces hansenii, Gg = Galactomyces geotrichum, Is= Issatchenkia scutulata, Ka = Kloekera apis, Kj= Kloekera japonica, Kp= Kloekera apis, Km = Kluyveromyces marxianus, Ko= Kodamaea ohmeri, Ls – Leucosporidium scottii, Mr= Metschinikowia reukaufi, Mg= Meyerozyma guilliermondii, Pk= Pichia kluyveri, Ku= Pichia kudriazivel, Pz= Prototheca zopfii, Pa= Pseudozyma antartica, Rg= Rhodotorula glutinis, Rm= Rhodotorula mucilaginosa, Sc= Saccharomyces cereviseae, Sa= Saccharomycopsis crataegensis, Sp= Sympodimycopsis paphiopedili, Tl= Trichosporum laibachii, Tm= Trichosporum montevideense, Wp= Wicherhamomyces pijperi, Yl= Yarrowia lipolytica and Yf= yeast like fungus.