| Literature DB >> 24031987 |
Yong-Hao Chen1, Jun Li, Li Liu, Hong-Zhi Liu, Qiang Wang.
Abstract
A mutant designated NC2168, which was selected from wild-type Streptococcus equisimilis CVCC55116 by ultraviolet ray combined with(60)Co-γ ray treatment and does not produce streptolysin, was employed to produce hyaluronic acid (HA). In order to increase the output of HA in a flask, the culture medium and conditions for NC2168 were optimized in this study. The influence of culture medium ingredients including carbon sources, nitrogen sources and metal ions on HA production was evaluated using factional factorial design. The mathematical model, which represented the effect of each medium component and their interaction on the yield of HA, was established by the quadratic rotary combination design and response surface method. The model estimated that, a maximal yield of HA could be obtained when the concentrations of yeast extract, peptone, glucose, and MgSO4 were set at 3 g/100 mL, 2 g/100 mL, 0.5 g/100 mL and 0.15 g/100 mL, respectively. Compared with the values obtained by other runs in the experimental design, the optimized medium resulted in a remarkable increase in the output of HA and the maximum of the predicted HA production was 174.76 mg/L. The model developed was accurate and reliable for predicting the production of HA by NC2168.Cultivation conditions were optimized by an orthogonal experimental design and the optimal conditions were as follows: temperature 33°C, pH 7.8, agitation speed 200 rpm, medium volume 20 mL.Entities:
Keywords: Streptococcus equisimilis mutant; culture conditions; culture medium; hyaluronic acid; optimization
Year: 2012 PMID: 24031987 PMCID: PMC3769034 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-838220120004000040
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Experimental design matrix of RSM and the responses of the dependent variables
| Design matrix (g/100 mL) | Output of HA (mg/L) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Run | Yeast extract | Peptone | Glucose | MgSO4·7H2O | Experiment value | Fitted value |
| 1 | 1 (3.83) | 1 (2.60) | 1 (0.74) | 1 (0.23) | 136.11 | 135.97 |
| 2 | 1 (3.83) | -1 (1.41) | 1 (0.74) | -1 (0.07) | 124.39 | 120.13 |
| 3 | -1 (2.17) | 1 (2.60) | 1 (0.74) | -1 (0.07) | 140.83 | 137.39 |
| 4 | -1 (2.17) | -1 (1.41) | 1 (0.74) | 1 (0.23) | 136.6 | 134.83 |
| 5 | 1 (3.83) | 1 (2.60) | -1 (0.26) | -1 (0.07) | 126.67 | 118.91 |
| 6 | 1 (3.83) | -1 (1.41) | -1 (0.26) | 1 (0.23) | 121.46 | 115.39 |
| 7 | -1 (2.17) | 1 (2.60) | -1 (0.26) | 1 (0.23) | 128.13 | 122.81 |
| 8 | -1 (2.17) | -1 (1.41) | -1 (0.26) | -1 (0.07) | 131.88 | 122.49 |
| 9 | -1.68 (1.60) | 0 (2.00) | 0 (0.50) | 0 (0.15) | 111.53 | 123.90 |
| 10 | 1.68 (4.40) | 0 (2.00) | 0 (0.50) | 0 (0.15) | 143.28 | 144.39 |
| 11 | 0 (3.00) | - | 0 (0.50) | 0 (0.15) | ||
| 1.68 (1.00) | 147.02 | 154.24 | ||||
| 12 | 0 (3.00) | 1.68 (3.00) | 0 (0.50) | 0 (0.15) | 136.6 | 142.84 |
| 13 | 0 (3.00) | 0 (2.00) | - | 0 (0.15) | ||
| 1.68 (0.10) | 125.36 | 133.51 | ||||
| 14 | 0 (3.00) | 0 (2.00) | 1.68 (0.90) | 0 (0.15) | 137.57 | 142.86 |
| 15 | 0 (3.00) | 0 (2.00) | 0 (0.50) | -1.68 (0.01) | 127.97 | 138.11 |
| 16 | 0 (3.00) | 0 (2.00) | 0 (0.50) | 1.68 (0.29) | 139.04 | 142.34 |
| 17 | 0 (3.00) | 0 (2.00) | 0 (0.50) | 0 (0.15) | 189.00 | 174.76 |
| 18 | 0 (3.00) | 0 (2.00) | 0 (0.50) | 0 (0.15) | 183.16 | 174.76 |
| 19 | 0 (3.00) | 0 (2.00) | 0 (0.50) | 0 (0.15) | 176.16 | 174.76 |
| 20 | 0 (3.00) | 0 (2.00) | 0 (0.50) | 0 (0.15) | 172.25 | 174.76 |
| 21 | 0 (3.00) | 0 (2.00) | 0 (0.50) | 0 (0.15) | 170.30 | 174.76 |
| 22 | 0 (3.00) | 0 (2.00) | 0 (0.50) | 0 (0.15) | 170.62 | 174.76 |
| 23 | 0 (3.00) | 0 (2.00) | 0 (0.50) | 0 (0.15) | 177.62 | 174.76 |
Orthogonal design and responsive value
| Run | Temperature (°C) | Rotate speed (rpm) | pH value | Medium volume (ml) | Output of HA (mg/L) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 (31) | 1 (100) | 1 (7.0) | 1 (20) | 103.06 |
| 2 | 1 (31) | 2 (150) | 2 (7.4) | 2 (30) | 109.91 |
| 3 | 1 (31) | 3 (200) | 3 (7.8) | 3 (40) | 147.43 |
| 4 | 2 (33) | 1 (100) | 2 (7.4) | 3 (40) | 128.40 |
| 5 | 2 (33) | 2 (150) | 3 (7.8) | 1 (20) | 196.73 |
| 6 | 2 (33) | 3 (200) | 1 (7.0) | 2 (30) | 96.90 |
| 7 | 3 (35) | 1 (100) | 3 (7.8) | 2 (30) | 129.31 |
| 8 | 3 (35) | 2 (150) | 1 (7.0) | 3 (40) | 75.21 |
| 9 | 3 (35) | 3 (200) | 2 (7.4) | 1 (20) | 144.59 |
| R | 24.31 | 9.48 | 66.1 | 36.09 |
Figure 1Effect of nitrogen sources on the output of HA “BHI” brain heart infusion, “YE” yeast extract, “PEP” peptone, “BE” beef extract. The “a-e” in Figure1–3 represented the significantly difference (p<0.05) between the different concentration of the same medium component.
Figure 2Effect of carbon sources on the output of HA. The numbers listed in the X axis represented 0.1, 0.5, 1.0, 2.0, 3.0, 4.0 g/100 mL carbon sources respectively.
Figure 3Effect of metal ions on the output of HA
Variance analysis for quadratic model and parameter estimates
| Variables | SS | DF | MS | F | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| X1 | 157.2006 | 1 | 157.2006 | 1.22456 | 0.30063 |
| X2 | 105.4269 | 1 | 105.4269 | 0.82125 | 0.39129 |
| X3 | 506.7100 | 1 | 506.7100 | 3.94716 | 0.08219 |
| X4 | 21.5302 | 1 | 21.5302 | 0.16772 | 0.69290 |
| X1X1 | 1286.6569 | 1 | 1286.6569 | 10.02277 | 0.01328 |
| X2X2 | 2555.3209 | 1 | 2555.3209 | 19.90538 | 0.00211 |
| X3X3 | 3170.9927 | 1 | 3170.9927 | 24.70132 | 0.00109 |
| X4X4 | 2271.0275 | 1 | 2271.0275 | 17.69079 | 0.00297 |
| X1X2 | 16.9127 | 1 | 16.9127 | 0.13175 | 0.72603 |
| X1X3 | 1.5939 | 1 | 1.5939 | 0.01242 | 0.91402 |
| X1X4 | 13.1225 | 1 | 13.1225 | 0.10222 | 0.75737 |
| X2X3 | 13.1225 | 1 | 13.1225 | 0.10222 | 0.75737 |
| X2X4 | 1.5939 | 1 | 1.5939 | 0.01242 | 0.91402 |
| X3X4 | 16.9127 | 1 | 16.9127 | 0.13175 | 0.72603 |
| X2X3 | 13.1225 | 1 | 13.1225 | 0.10222 | 0.75737 |
| Model | 10327.2038 | 14 | 737.6574 | F2=5.746 | 0.00229 |
| Residual | 1026.9872 | 8 | 128.3734 | ||
| Lack of fit | 735.7965 | 2 | 367.8982 | F1=7.581 | 0.01423 |
| Pure error | 291.1908 | 6 | 48.5318 |
Figure 4Response surface and contour plot of each independent variable effect and also their mutual effects on the production of HA
Variance analysis on the orthogonal experiment results
| Source | Degr. of | F | Significance | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| block | 2 | 0.15 | 0.8653 | |
| Temperature | 2 | 5.72 | 0.0133 | * |
| Rotate speed | 2 | 3.44 | 0.0571 | |
| pH | 2 | 75.81 | <.0001 | ** |
| Medium volume | 2 | 18.68 | <.0001 | ** |