| Literature DB >> 24031852 |
Abstract
In this study, forty-two fungi from soil were isolated and tested for their carboxymethyl cellulase (CMCase) and xylanase activities. From all isolates, the fungal isolate FR60, which was identified as Aspergillus aculeatus Iizuka, showed high activities in both CMCase and xylanase with 517 mU/mg protein and 550 mU/mg protein, respectively. The crude enzyme from A. aculeatus Iizuka FR60 could hydrolyze several agricultural residues such as corncob, and sweet sorghum leaf and stalk at comparable rates with respect to the tested commercial enzymes and with a maximum rate in rice hull hydrolysis (29 μg sugar g(-1) dry weight substrate mg(-1) enzyme hr(-1)). The highest amount of glucose was obtained from corncob by using the crude enzyme from A. aculeatus Iizuka FR60 (10.1 g/100 g dry substrate). From overall enzymatic treatment results, the lowest sugar yield was from rice hulls treatment (1.6 g/100 g dry weight) and the highest amount of reducing sugar was obtained from rice straw treatment (15.3 g/100 g dry weight). Among tested agricultural wastes, rice hull could not be effectively hydrolyzed by enzymes, whereas sugarcane leaf and stalk, and peanut shell could be effectively hydrolyzed (30-31% total sugar comparing with total sugar yield from acid treatment).Entities:
Keywords: Agricultural wastes; Aspergillus aculeatus Iizuka; Enzymatic hydrolysis; Mean specific rate; Reducing sugars
Year: 2012 PMID: 24031852 PMCID: PMC3768813 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-83822012000200005
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Figure 1Carboxymethyl cellulase (CMCase) and xylanase specific activities of some fungal isolates from this study.
Figure 2Morphology of the fungal isolate FR60, which was identified as Aspergillus aculeatus Iizuka.
Cellulose content and composition (% (w/w) of dry matter)
| Agricultural | Cellulose | Hemicelluloses | Lignin | Others |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bagasse[ | 44 | 23 | 20 | 13 |
| Corncob[ | 34.1 | 42.5 | 12.8 | 10.6 |
| Peanut shell[ | 22.1 | 12.1 | 35.2 | 30.6 |
| Rice hull[ | 49.1 | 9.6 | 12.9 | 28.4 |
| Rice straw[ | 33 | 26 | 7 | 34 |
| Sugarcane leaf & stalk[ | 40 | 29 | 13 | 18 |
| Sorghum leaf & stalk[ | 31 | 30 | 11 | 28 |
Dueñas et al., 1995
Singh and Kalra, 1978
Martin et al., 2007
Marsden and Gray, 1986
Amount of total sugar (g/100 g dry weight) released from the tested agricultural products by acid and enzymatic treatments (n = 3). The last column shows an average percentage of the reducing sugars amount gained from the enzymatic reaction (Cellubrix®L, Celluclast®1.5L, and the crude enzyme from A. aculeatus Iizuka FR60) comparing with the acid hydrolysis, by which the value was used as a complete (100%) yield.
| Acid | Cellubrix® L | Celluclast® 1.5L | Average percentage | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bagasse | 49.2 ± 2.5 | 7.8 ± 0.4 | 8.6 ± 0.4 | 7.4 ± 0.4 | 15% |
| Corncob | 38.4 ± 1.9 | 2.6 ± 0.1 | 8.0 ± 0.4 | 10.1 ± 0.5 | 24% |
| Peanut shell | 22.8 ± 1.1 | 6.8 ± 0.3 | 15.3 ± 0.8 | 6.7 ± 0.3 | 30% |
| Rice hull | 47.2 ± 2.4 | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 1.6 ± 0.1 | 3.3 ± 0.2 | 3% |
| Rice straw | 59.5 ± 3.0 | 24.9 ± 1.2 | 15.9 ± 0.8 | 14.7 ± 0.7 | 26% |
| Sugarcane leaf & stalk | 43.8 ± 2.2 | 13.2 ± 0.7 | 13.9 ± 0.7 | 5.2 ± 0.3 | 31% |
| Sweet sorghum leaf & stalk | 49.6 ± 2.5 | 10.8 ± 0.5 | 9.3 ± 0.5 | 9.3 ± 0.5 | 19% |
Yields of sugar from agricultural substrates after various hydrolysis stratagies (acid and enzymatic) (g/100 g dry substrate): A = Acid; B = Cellubrix®L; C = Celluclast®1.5L; D = the crude enzyme from A. aculeatus Iizuka FR60. (n = 3)
| Glucose | Xylose | Other (reduced form) | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| A | B | C | D | A | B | C | D | A | B | C | D | |
| Bagasse | 4.3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 24.0 | 7.8 | 8.6 | 0 | 20.8 | 0 | 0 | 7.4 |
| Corncob | 4.7 | 0 | 0 | 10.1 | 28.1 | 0 | 8.0 | 0 | 5.6 | 2.6 | 0 | 0 |
| Peanut shell | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.7 | 6.8 | 7.8 | 0 | 16.1 | 0 | 7.5 | 6.7 |
| Rice hull | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 21.7 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25.4 | 1.6 | 1.6 | 3.3 |
| Rice straw | 1.5 | 4.8 | 4.0 | 8.3 | 24.6 | 8.0 | 9.2 | 0 | 33.4 | 0 | 0 | 6.4 |
| Sugarcane leaf & stalk | 2.1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 27.4 | 8.0 | 9.0 | 0 | 14.3 | 5.2 | 4.9 | 5.1 |
| Sweet sorghum leaf & stalk | 4.9 | 0 | 9.1 | 7.3 | 24.0 | 6.3 | 0 | 0 | 20.7 | 4.5 | 2 | 0 |
Figure 3The mean specific rate of the enzymatic hydrolysis. Reducing sugars released in the hydrolysates were analyzed with the DNS method (n = 3).