| Literature DB >> 24031819 |
Vijay Kumar1, Alpana Bharti, Yogesh Kumar Negi, Omprakash Gusain, Piyush Pandey, Gajraj Singh Bisht.
Abstract
Actinomycetes from earthworm castings were isolated and screened for their antimicrobial activity and industrial enzymes. A total of 48 isolates were obtained from 12 samples of earthworm castings. Highest numbers of isolates were recovered from forest site (58.33 %) as compared to grassland (25%) and agricultural land (16.66%). The growth patterns, mycelial coloration of abundance actinomycetes were documented. The dominant genera Identified by cultural, morphological and physiological characteristics were Streptomyces (60.41%) followed by Streptosporangium (10.41%),Saccharopolyspora (6.25%) and Nocardia (6.25%). Besides these, other genera like Micromonospora, Actinomadura, Microbispora, Planobispora and Nocardiopsis were also recovered but in low frequency. Among the 48 isolates, 52.08% were found active against one or more test organisms. Out of 25 active isolates 16% showed activity against bacterial, human fungal as well as phytopathogens. Among 48 isolates 38, 32, 21, 20, 16 and 14 produced enzyme amylase, caseinase, cellulase, gelatinase, xylanase and lipase respectively while 10 isolates produced all the enzymes. More interestingly 2, 3, and 1 isolates produced amylase, xylanase and lipase at 45°C respectively. In the view of its antimicrobial activity as well as enzyme production capability the genus Streptomyces was dominant. The isolate EWC 7(2) was most promising on the basis of its interesting antimicrobial activity and was identified as Streptomyces rochei. The results of these findings have increased the scope of finding industrially important actinomycetes from earthworm castings and these organisms could be promising sources for industrially important molecules or enzymes.Entities:
Keywords: Antimicrobial activity; actinomycetes; earthworm castings; enzymes
Year: 2012 PMID: 24031819 PMCID: PMC3768992 DOI: 10.1590/S1517-838220120001000022
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Braz J Microbiol ISSN: 1517-8382 Impact factor: 2.476
Details of sampling site and isolation of actinomycetes from the Earthworm castings (Pheretima posthuma)
| Location | Collection site | pH | No. of isolates |
|---|---|---|---|
| Dehradun | Forest | 8.5 | 28 |
| Grassland | 8.0 | 12 | |
| Agricultural land | 7.5 | 8 | |
| Total | 48 |
Figure 1Growth characteristics of actinomycetes isolated from the earthworm castings
Figure 2Mycelial coloration of actinomycetes isolated from earthworm castings
Figure 3Distribution of actinomycetes in earthworm casting (Identified using cultural, morphological and physiological characteristics)
Figure 4(a) Antimicrobial profile of actinomycetes isolated from earthworm casting (b) Antagonistic potential of genus Streptomyces as compare to other genera
| Isolates | Genera | Bacterial test organisms (IZD) | Human fungal pathogens (IZD) | Phytopathogens (IZD) | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SA | BS | EC | PS | CA | TR | MC | AF | MP | FO | RS | ||
| EWC 1 | Streptomyces | 15.6 ± 1.24 | 17.6 ± 0.47 | 12.6 ± 0.94 | 10.3 ± 0.47 | 14.0 ± 1.63 | – | – | 9.6 ± 0.47 | – | – | – |
| EWC2 | Streptomyces | 19.0 ± 0.81 | 20.3 ± 1.24 | 9.0 ± 0.81 | 9.3 ± 0.47 | – | – | – | – | 17.6 ± 0.47 | 19.33 ± 0.94 | 17.3 ± 0.47 |
| EWC 3 | Streptomyces | 16.6 ± 1.69 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| EWC 4 | Micromonospora | – | – | – | – | 20.0 ± 1.41 | – | – | – | 13.3 ± 0.47 | 16.3 ± 1.24 | 15.6 ± 1.69 |
| EWC 5 | Streptosporangium | 26.6 ± 1.24 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| EWC 6 | Nocardia | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 10.0 ± 0.00 | – | – | – |
| EWC 7( | Streptomyces | 25.0 ± 2.00 | 26.0 ± 0.81 | 24.0 ± 0.58 | 17.0 ± 0.58 | 20.0 ± 0.47 | 19.0 ± 0.81 | 18.3 ± 0.47 | – | 29.6 ± 0.47 | 21.3 ± 0.94 | 24.3 ± 0.94 |
| EWC 8 | Streptomyces | 20.0 ± 0.81 | 16.3 ± 0.94 | 10.3 ± 0.47 | 9.6 ± 0.47 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| EWC 9 | Nocardiopsis | 14.6 ± 0.94 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| EWC 11 | Streptomyces | 25.0 ± 1.63 | 20.6 ± 0.94 | – | – | – | – | 15.6 ± 0.94 | – | – | – | – |
| EWC 12 | Streptomyces | – | – | – | – | – | 21.0 ± 0.81 | – | – | – | – | – |
| EWC 14 | Nocardia | 19.33 ± 0.47 | – | – | – | – | 15.3 ± 0.47 | – | – | – | 12.0 ± 0.00 | – |
| EWC15 | Streptomyces | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | 17.0 ± 1.87 |
| EWC 18 | Streptomyces | 27.6 ± 0.94 | 23.0 ± 0.00 | – | – | – | 10.6 ± 0.47 | – | – | – | 10.00 ± 0.00 | – |
| EWC 19 | Streptomyces | 13.6 ± 1.24 | 16.0 ± 1.41 | – | – | 17.6 ± 0.124 | – | – | – | – | – | 20.1 ± 0.62 |
| EWC 20 | Streptomyces | 17.3 ± 1.24 | – | – | – | – | 15.6 ± 1.05 | – | – | – | – | – |
| EWC 22 | Planobispora | – | – | – | 12.6 ± 0.94 | – | 16.0 ± 0.00 | – | – | – | – | – |
| EWC 24 | Saccharopolyspora | – | – | – | 14.0 ±0.81 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| EWC 30 | Streptomyces | – | – | – | – | 19.3 ± 1.02 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| EWC 41 | Actinomadura | – | – | 17.0 ± 1.41 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| EWC43 | Streptomyces | – | – | 17.3 ± 0.47 | – | 18.5 ± 0.70 | – | – | – | – | – | – |
| EWC44 | Streptomyces | – | – | – | – | 15.0 ± 0.00 | – | 9.8 ± 1.54 | – | – | – | – |
| EWC 45 | Streptomyces | – | 18.0 ± 0.81 | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | – | |
| EWC46 | Streptosporangium | – | – | – | – | – | 17.6 ± 0.62 | – | – | – | – | – |
| EWC 47 | Streptomyces | – | – | 11.3 ± 1.24 | – | – | – | 11.1 ± 1.02 | – | – | – | – |
The values are average of triplicates ± standard deviation
Figure 5Extracellular enzymes production in actinomycetes isolated from earthworm castings (The data is not mutually exclusive)