Literature DB >> 2403180

Clinical comparison of freeze-dried and fresh frozen patellar tendon allografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction of the knee.

P A Indelicato1, E S Bittar, T J Prevot, G A Woods, T P Branch, M Huegel.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate the clinical outcome of freeze-dried compared to fresh frozen allograft tissue used as a substitute for a ruptured ACL of the knee. In addition, the incidence of any graft rejection phenomena was recorded. Forty-one patients with ACL deficient knees underwent reconstructive surgery using a patellar bone-tendon-bone allograft that had been freeze-dried (Group 1, N = 14) or fresh frozen (Group 2, N = 27). All patients underwent the same implant technique and rehabilitation program. Followup ranged from 24 to 36 months. The evaluation consisted of subjective, objective, and instrumented laxity testing (KT-1000, MEDmetric, San Diego, CA; and Genucom, FARO Medical Technologies, Inc., Montreal, Canada). There were 31 males and 10 females. Eleven (79%) patients in Group 1 thought their knee was "normal" or "improved," and 25 (93%) in Group 2 thought the same. In addition, 10 (71%) patients in Group 1 denied any "giving way," compared to 26 (96%) in Group 2. The mean Lysholm knee score in Group 1 was 86/100 (range, 22 to 100) compared to 92/100 (range, 59 to 100). Clinical examination included the Lachman test and tests for anterior drawer sign and pivot shift. Postoperatively, Group 1 patients had the following results: Lachman test--seven Grade 0, six Grade 1, one Grade 2; anterior drawer sign--eight Grade 0, five Grade 1, one Grade 2; and pivot shift--seven Grade 0, five "trace," and two "present."(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  1990        PMID: 2403180     DOI: 10.1177/036354659001800401

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Sports Med        ISSN: 0363-5465            Impact factor:   6.202


  7 in total

1.  The remodelling process of allogeneic and autogenous patellar tendon grafts in rats: a radiochemical study.

Authors:  J Nagano; K Shino; A Maeda; K Nakata; S Horibe
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 3.067

2.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with fresh-frozen patellar tendon allografts: sixty cases with 2 years' minimum follow-up.

Authors:  J R Nín; M Leyes; D Schweitzer
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1996       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 3.  Review on tension in the natural and reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament.

Authors:  H N Andersen; A A Amis
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with fresh-frozen patellar tendon allografts.

Authors:  J R Valenti; D Sala; D Schweitzer
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  1994       Impact factor: 3.075

5.  Arthroscopically assisted meniscal allograft transplantation with and without combined anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Erol A Yoldas; Jon K Sekiya; James J Irrgang; Freddie H Fu; Christopher D Harner
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2003-05-09       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  A literature review of autograft and allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  Jonathan Marrale; Matthew C Morrissey; Fares S Haddad
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2007-04-12       Impact factor: 4.114

7.  Double-bundle PCL reconstruction using autologous hamstring tendons: outcome with a minimum 2-year follow-up.

Authors:  Ricardo de Paula Leite Cury; Rômulo Neves Castro Filho; Daniel Akira Sadatsune; Davi Ribeiro do Prado; Ricardo José Peruzzo Gonçalves; Marcos Barbieri Mestriner
Journal:  Rev Bras Ortop       Date:  2017-03-06
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.