Literature DB >> 24031784

Effect of freeze drying process on some properties of Streptococcus thermophilus isolated from dairy products.

Krishan K Selwal1, Manjit K Selwal, D N Gandhi.   

Abstract

The present investigation represents the effect of freeze drying on some properties as acid and bile tolerance of Streptococcus thermophilus MTCC 1938 culture isolated from dairy products. The cell paste obtained from milk based medium was freeze dried with a pressure of 50-100 mtorr for 24h at -40°C. Acid and bile tolerance test exhibited 3.8-4.9 and 3.2-3.8 log counts reduction after freeze drying respectively.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acid and Bile tolerance; Cryoprotective agent; Streptococcus thermophilus

Year:  2011        PMID: 24031784      PMCID: PMC3768728          DOI: 10.1590/S1517-838220110004000037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Braz J Microbiol        ISSN: 1517-8382            Impact factor:   2.476


Commercial lactic acid bacteria (LAB) have been widely used for the manufacture of fermented milk products and the inclusion of probiotic microorganism in dairy products is a usual practice, in order to increase their health beneficial effect. Streptococcus thermophilus is used, along with other microorganisms, as a starter culture for the manufacture of several important fermented dairy foods, including yogurt, acidophilus bio-yogurt, and mozzarella cheese (7). In recent time, preservation of starter cultures through freeze-drying has gained prominence within the dairy industry. Nevertheless, during the drying process, the cells undergoes through harsh environmental conditions, causing detrimental effects on the cells. The major contributory factors responsible for viability loss are osmotic shock and membrane injury, due to intracellular ice formation and recrystallization. To protect the cells from these injuries, certain cryoprotective agents, like polysaccharide, polyols, sugar alcohol, amino acid, peptides, and proteins are used (6, 11). However, few reports are available on the influence of freeze drying on potential properties of S. thermophilus cultures (4). The main objective of this work was to study the relevant properties, including acid, bile tolerance, cell surface hydrophobicity, and antimicrobial activity of a S. thermophilus culture isolated from dairy products London, before and after freeze drying. To achieve our objectives, a culture of S. thermophilus (MTCC 1938) was obtained from Microbial Type Culture Collection (MTCC), Chandigarh, India. Cell biomass was produced in a 5L capacity fermenter (Bio-Age International, Chandigarh, India) with working volume of 3.5 L, in the SYG medium, composed of skim milk (11% Non Fat Milk Solid, (Experimental dairy plant, NDRI, Karnal ); 0.5% (w/v) yeast extract (Hi-media, Mumbai, India) and 1.5% (w/v) glucose (Hi-media, Mumbai, India). The cells from the growth medium were harvested by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 10 minutes (Sigma, Rotor No–11250) and suspended in equal volume of sterilized SSMG cryoprotective solution composed of skim milk supplemented with 7% sucrose (Hi-Media, Mumbai, India), 1.5% gelatin (Hi-Media, Mumbai, India) and 1 M (Molar) monosodium glutamic acid (Hi-media, Mumbai, India). The mixtures were frozen at -80°C overnight and then freeze-dried using freeze dryer (Christ Alpha D-37520, Germany) under the pressure of 50–100 mtorr for 24 h at -40°C. The buffers used in the study were: PUM buffer (g/l): K2HPO4.3H2O:22.20; KH2PO4:7.26; Urea: 1.80; MgSO4: 0.20; pH: 7.10. Saline solution (g/l) NaCl: 8.50. Acid tolerance of S. thermophilus (before and after freeze drying) was studied at different pH solutions. The solutions were prepared by adjusting the hydrochloric acid (HCl) solution to pH levels of 1.5, 2.0 and 3.0 in distilled water. Sterile double distilled water (pH 6.5) served as control. Ten ml of each pH solution was taken in sterilized test tubes and mixed with 0.1 g of freeze dried powder of the culture containing about 108–109 CFU/ml. One ml from each pH solution was taken immediately (0 h) and after 1, 2, 3 h of incubation and serial dilutions were prepared using sterile saline solution. Similarly, bile tolerance was studied by preparing 1% and 2% bile salt solutions. Sterile double distilled water without bile salt was used as control. Ten ml of each solution was transferred into sterile test tubes and mixed with fresh, as well as freeze dried cells of S. thermophilus containing approx. 108–109 CFU/mL. The tubes were then incubated at 37°C aerobically. One ml of culture was taken out from each tube immediately (0 h), after 3, 8, and 12 h incubation period. Serial dilutions were prepared in sterile saline blanks, plated on M17 agar and incubated for 72 h at 37°C. Cell surface hydrophobicity was determined by growing freeze dried cells in M17 broth (Hi-Media, Mumbai, India) under aerobic conditions for 16–18 h at 37°C. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 7,000 rpm for 10 min, washed twice in Phosphate Urea Magnesium (PUM) buffer and finally suspended in the same buffer. Four milliliter suspension bearing initial absorbance (A) of 0.8–0.9 at 600 nm was mixed with 0.8 ml n-hexadecane and vortexed at high speed for 2–3 min. The mixture was left undisturbed for 1 h at 37°C to allow the phase separation. The lower aqueous phase was carefully removed with a sterile Pasteur pipette and final absorbance (Ao) was recorded. The decreased absorbance in aqueous phase was taken as measure of cell surface hydrophobicity (H%) and calculated using following equation: Antagonistic activity of S. thermophilus was assessed by using agar well assay method against Vibrio cholarae MTCC 3906, Staphylococcus aureus NCDC 110, Escherichia coli NCDC -135, Shigella sp. AIIMS, Salmonella sp MTCC 3219 according to Anand et al [1]. Cell free supernatant (CFS) was obtained by inoculating the culture in skim milk and incubate it at 37°C for 10–12 h. The cells were harvested by centrifugation at 10,000 rpm for 15 min. The resulting supernatant was carefully removed and 30 µl of CFS was added in the well of Nutrient Agar medium (Hi-Media, India) previously inoculated with 0.5 ml of pathogenic culture (containing 107–108 CFU/mL). The diameter of the test strain growth inhibition zone was measured. Acid and bile salts tests were performed in triplicates. Data were analyzed by using the one way analysis of variance (ANOVA) procedure of SYSTAT 6.0.1 (Statistical Software Package, 1996, SPSS, Inc., USA). Significant differences between means were calculated by using Duncan’s multiple range tests, where means of triplicate values were stated significantly different when the probability level was (p < 0.05) The tested organism showed a steady loss in viability when exposed to acidic conditions. Fresh cells of S. thermophilus (before freeze drying) showed better tolerance at low pH 1.5 and survive up to 2 h (Fig. 1a), suggesting it is having some probiotic properties. After drying of cells, significant reduction (P<0.05) in cell counts took place at all pH solutions. The culture tolerated pH 3.0 and 2.0 well with 5.3 and 5.1 log cfu/ml, but exhibited poor tolerance to pH 1.5 and lost about 3.5–5.5 log count of cells after 3 h of incubation (Fig. 1b). Most microorganisms are destroyed by low pH and hydrochloric acid in the stomach. In human, the time from entrance to release from the stomach was reported to be 90 min and the bactericidal effect of the acid is evident at pH values below 2.5 (2). Hence, the survival of S. thermophilus culture was studied under in vitro conditions imitating the physicochemical events occurring in the gastrointestinal tract. The incubation time chosen for acid and bile tolerance tests was 3 h and 12 h respectively, simulating the residence time in the human stomach. This finding was supported by studies of Khalil (5), indicating that the death of the streptococcal strains at pH 1.5 was higher. The survival of S. thermophilus CHCC 3534 strain was higher in comparison to our study. This could be explained by the difference in the test protocol and intrinsic difference between the two strains.
Figure 1

Acid tolerance of S. thermophilus culture (a) Before freeze drying (b) After freeze drying at [○]-pH 3 [■] – pH 2 [▲] – pH 1.5 [◆] – Control. Bars represent standard error of mean value of triplicate experiments.

Acid tolerance of S. thermophilus culture (a) Before freeze drying (b) After freeze drying at [○]-pH 3 [■] – pH 2 [▲] – pH 1.5 [◆] – Control. Bars represent standard error of mean value of triplicate experiments. Similarly, fresh cells (prior to freeze-drying) tended to have slightly better tolerance to all bile solutions than the freeze-dried cells. The cell counts were in the range of 9.0–9.3 log CFU/mL and about 2.2–3.5 log count decreased after the bile salt treatment (Fig. 2a). Freeze-drying had no effect on the bile tolerance in the conditions tested. The culture showed considerable tolerance as it gave a viable count of 5.9 and 5.2 log CFU /mL after 12 h of incubation at 1% and 2% bile concentrations, respectively, after freeze drying (Fig. 2b). However, the control showed continuous increase in cell counts up to 12 h of incubation. The loss in viability was higher in 2% of bile salt concentration (3.5 log CFU/mL reductions after 12 h) than 1% bile salt concentration. This behavior indicates some possible properties of this strain as a probiotic microorganism, since it survived at 2% bile salt solution, which is equivalent to the physiological concentration in the duodenum (3, 12). Furthermore, the drying conditions caused some injury to the cells and thus increased the possibilities for their viability loss.
Figure 2

Bile tolerance of S. thermophilus culture (a) Before freeze drying (b) After freeze drying at [◆] -0% Bile concentration (control) [■] - 1% Bile concentration [▲] - 2% Bile concentration. Bars represent standard error of mean value of triplicate experiments.

Bile tolerance of S. thermophilus culture (a) Before freeze drying (b) After freeze drying at [◆] -0% Bile concentration (control) [■] - 1% Bile concentration [▲] - 2% Bile concentration. Bars represent standard error of mean value of triplicate experiments. Hydrophobicity results revealed that the culture had 4.7%±0.4 hydrophobicity towards n-hexadecane and no significant difference was observed between fresh and dried cells. In our study, cell surface hydrophobicity was found to be lower. The results were in accordance with that of reported by Owehand et al (8). Furthermore, incubation time, adhesion buffer, growth conditions, and growth medium influence the cell surface hydrophobicity very significantly. The validity of results from in vitro adhesion assays remains extremely uncertain in the case of hydrophobocity (9). The agar well-diffusion method results (Table I) showed that the crude CFS had moderate activity against Escherichia coli and Vibirio cholarae, since these strains were strongly inhibited (10 and 9 mm inhibition zone size respectively). No activity was observed against other pathogenic strains. The production levels and the proportion of inhibitory compounds depend on the strain, medium compounds and physical parameters. From our study, we suggest that the organism probably controlled the growth of pathogens through the production of inhibitory compounds, such as lactic acid, acetic acid and formic acid. Antimicrobial activity of cell free supernatants of S. thermophilus against common pathogens. (-): No zone was observed The result demonstrated that the freeze drying process yield a powdery form of culture and has little impact on the acid and bile tolerance properties. Optimization of the production process and the cryoprotective agents are the most important factors. However, a better way of using the strain is as a support culture consisting of non probiotic strain or a yoghurt culture (10). In conclusion, the culture showed some promising probiotic properties and further tests and in-vivo study must be carried out to confirm its probiotic attributes.
Table 1

Antimicrobial activity of cell free supernatants of S. thermophilus against common pathogens. (-): No zone was observed

Indicator OrganismsZone of Inhibition
Staphylococcus aureus NCDC 110-
Escherichia coli NCDC -13510 mm
Vibirio cholarae MTCC 39069 mm
Shigella sp AIIMS-
Salmonella sp MTCC 3219-
  4 in total

1.  Bifidobacterium from fermented milks: survival during gastric transit.

Authors:  N Berrada; J F Lemeland; G Laroche; P Thouvenot; M Piaia
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 4.034

2.  Streptococcus thermophilus and Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus survive gastrointestinal transit of healthy volunteers consuming yogurt.

Authors:  Denis D G Mater; Laurent Bretigny; Olivier Firmesse; Maria-Jose Flores; Agnès Mogenet; Jean-Louis Bresson; Gérard Corthier
Journal:  FEMS Microbiol Lett       Date:  2005-09-15       Impact factor: 2.742

3.  Bile salt deconjugation and cholesterol removal from media by Lactobacillus casei.

Authors:  M M Brashears; S E Gilliland; L M Buck
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 4.034

4.  Evidence for probiotic potential of a capsular-producing Streptococcus thermophilus CHCC 3534 strain.

Authors:  Rowaida Khalil
Journal:  Pol J Microbiol       Date:  2009
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.